12:53:15 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Hello all
12:58:49 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Warm welcome all
12:58:54 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
We are still gathering
13:00:57 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Hi Vanda
13:04:58 From Dave Kissoondoyal - ICANN ALAC to Everyone:
Hello everyone. Sorry for being late. I am facing connectivity challenges
13:07:30 From Michelle DeSmyter - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Welcome everyone that has just joined us!
13:19:28 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
A reminder here as well, these proposed changes are the results of extensive work from the NomCom Review Implementation WG (that had a LOT of At-Large active membership and was even Co-Chaired by me, these resulting recommendations have been highly influenced by our Regional views
13:21:54 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
it means that from the 8 appointments to the Board that NC makes 3 *should* be fitting the criteria that makes them classed as demonsterably Unaffiliated
13:21:58 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
NO
13:22:24 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
the ACSO appointments are untouched
13:24:50 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
Okay, I get it. No touching of bd members for specific seats like seat 15
13:25:09 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
that is attached to At Large
13:25:46 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
totally the other half of the Board
13:26:00 From Hadia’s iPhone to Everyone:
@Marita yes this is only with regard to the directors that are seated by the NomCom
13:26:23 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
But a future NC COULD do 3+ at once
13:26:40 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
Sorry to be slow on the uptake
13:27:47 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
NP it is actually quite complex
13:28:04 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Indeed Yrio it is the intention
13:29:26 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
always has been but there is also annual 'confusion' in what that actually means thus the specifics detailed on what makes a candidate classed as Unaffiliated
13:29:44 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
We got two excellent candidates last year
13:30:08 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
we regularly see excellent ones appointed
13:30:23 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
Each year we appoint a new unaffiliated directors
13:30:24 From Vanda Scartezini - Brazil to Everyone:
true but they were in some way involved with the “environment”
13:31:23 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
I agree that directors to not have time to get to know the ICANN ecosystem. They need to hit the ground running
13:31:28 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
and the criteria allows for exactly that IF the wording is unclear in that proposed definition then we need to not such AND suggest clearer text in any comment made
13:31:49 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
AI: Special page to comment on this discussion of the "Unaffiliated Director"
13:32:17 From Vanda Scartezini - Brazil to Everyone:
@cheryl- this in my opinion is fundamental since understanding in all languages is fundamental for the work at NOMCOM
13:33:04 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
yes Vanda the intent is to reduce the risk of confusion and differentiation on this between future NomComs
13:34:03 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
I would agree with a two year term in order to maximize the acquired knowledge of nomcom members
13:34:10 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Remembering that actual Votes are a rare thing (often just a vote to ratify a final slate) in any NC
13:34:18 From Vanda Scartezini - Brazil to Everyone:
guess the standard committee will help to keep tracking on this
13:34:34 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Yes Vanda it is specific to that role as well
13:36:14 From Seb Bachollet to Everyone:
I didn’t get the 2 years terms
How can someone have a second term (of 2 years)
13:36:56 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
SeB for such a second term they would need to have a term off
13:37:43 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
6 question
13:37:54 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
this is not a question asked
13:38:30 From Alfredo Calderon to Everyone:
Agreed @Holy. Let’s not dwell on the issue.
13:39:07 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
That was withdrawn for good cause and spurned this very request for the answers to the 6 questions
13:39:10 From Alfredo Calderon to Everyone:
Sorry for the misspelling @Holly
13:40:00 From Holly Raiche to Everyone:
@ Alberto - not s problem. I make the mistake myself!
13:41:12 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
Okay, good enough explanation -- for the question re: voting
13:42:43 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
You agreed to the terms did you not,
13:42:57 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
The deadline for the letter is 30 June.
13:43:12 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
you see the wisdom on all but leadership Voting I trust
13:43:33 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
The NomCom Standing Committee deserves ABSOLUTE support
13:44:07 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
Yes, I am okay with the voting issue -- just the question should be asked
13:44:17 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
just thought
13:45:32 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
AI; Issues to respond a ) b and d )
13:45:36 From Vanda Scartezini - Brazil to Everyone:
+1 Cheryl. but Judith haas a point that general info about rebalancing , independently from the letter , for this item C because it is part of the whole demand from public comment
13:45:36 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Standing Committee is essential IMO
13:45:52 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Agree Vanda
13:46:25 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
can we go back to the previous slide please
13:46:31 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
display the question perhaps
13:47:05 From Vanda Scartezini - Brazil to Everyone:
yes. the continuity is mandatory to help NOMCOm keeping with its activities focused on their work
13:47:08 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
Our input into the requested changes to Article 12 related to the RSSAC?
13:48:09 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023
13:48:42 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Bylaws Amendments and Documents to Implement the NomCom2 Review above
13:49:26 From Alfredo Calderon to Everyone:
A proposed amendment to Article 12 of the ICANN Bylaws is also presented at the request of the Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC). The RSSAC requests that if its appointed delegate becomes a voting member through this process, that the ICANN Board’s role in appointment of RSSAC membership and leadership be removed.
13:49:38 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf
13:49:55 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
UPDATED PUBLIC COMMENT VERSION – APRIL 2023 in link above
13:49:59 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
additional edits to the article has been requested BY the sending body
13:50:05 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
we should Support that
13:50:06 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
At Large chooses not to comment on the RSSAC decision just to support the action by the Review Committee to give it a voting slot.
13:50:06 From Alfredo Calderon to Everyone:
Yes, I agree @Holly.
13:50:23 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
That makes sense -- this is a change needed to enable or equalize the previous change
13:51:45 From Naveed to Everyone:
Replying to "A proposed amendment..."
What's the rational of this amendment in the context of the proposed change in Nomcom?
13:51:47 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Exactly
13:52:01 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
vanda we should NOT do other than support
13:52:17 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
At Large chooses not to comment on the RSSAC request just to support the action by the Review Committee to give it a voting slot.
13:52:18 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
it is there requested change
13:52:33 From Vanda Scartezini - Brazil to Everyone:
yes - not interfere in other AC/SO please…
13:53:14 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Sorry it was obfuscated in ontro text
13:53:19 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
intro
13:54:03 From Alfredo Calderon to Everyone:
Yes @Holly. We should support the RSSAC voting delegate with the corresponding change, if the RSSAC supports the change.
13:54:19 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
AI: Statement to be finalized by 19 May (tomorrow)
13:54:47 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
but the PC text intros is not written by the NC Review Implementation WG BTW
13:54:55 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Makes sense
13:55:07 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
OFB WG will have 2-3 days to comment
13:55:12 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Jonathan, do you agree with a 3 day ALAC vote?
13:55:33 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Contentious issue " unaffiliated " and wording around it
13:55:35 From Dave Kissoondoyal - ICANN ALAC to Everyone:
Agree
13:55:37 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Starting on Wed, 24 May
13:55:45 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
PLease READ the proposed definitional terms wont you ;-)
13:56:11 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Re-balancing - what came out of the NOMCOM 2 - this is not part of this PC
13:56:20 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Just noting here
13:56:34 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Rebalancing could be all sorts of things this lot of implementation ALSO kept the size of the NC the same
13:56:51 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
@Holly, do you wish to also raise the PTI item next week’s agenda as well?
13:56:57 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Next week- Ad-hoc meeting on "rebalancing "
13:57:31 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
It's a VERY complicated matter
13:59:04 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
AI; Staff will set up a call for next week as requested
13:59:14 From Michelle DeSmyter - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Please note I will schedule a call for next week - thank you.
14:01:03 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
@ Holly and all so the deadline to finalize the statement is Tuesday May 23 is okay?
14:01:08 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
I'm happy to provide more info and answers at the next call on the rebalancing matter when there is suitable time
14:01:09 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
@michelle Could we do it on Wednesday since thursday afternoon is a cutting it really close to a jewish holiday
14:01:18 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
YES that STATEMENT it essential reading
14:01:51 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
there innocuous IMO I agree Holly
14:02:30 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Next meeting Rebalancing
14:02:33 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Thanks, Holly
14:02:46 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Are you ok with Thursday, 18:00 UTC ?
14:02:51 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
It is we understand rather complex Good work on it :-)
14:03:03 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
hopefully but may be traveling in a car
14:03:04 From Alfredo Calderon to Everyone:
Thank you @Holly.
14:04:04 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Thanks.
14:04:22 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Other things in your life?!
14:04:33 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Thank you all
14:04:37 From Dave Kissoondoyal - ICANN ALAC to Everyone:
Thanks and bye to all
14:04:40 From Silvia Vivanco - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Will send AIs around for your review
14:04:43 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
POst CPWG may work Holly it is pre 0700 here
14:04:45 From Vanda Scartezini - Brazil to Everyone:
ok thanks you all
14:04:46 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Thanks folks!
AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
ALAC Liaisons and Representatives
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
