Zoom chat: 2021-11-17 OFB-WG Recommendation Prioritization Sub-Group Call

00:11:12 Heidi Ullrich: See: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=155191622
00:11:23 Gisella Gruber - ICANN Org: Action Items: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=155191622
00:13:05 Jonathan Zuck: Lilac
00:13:43 Cheryl Langdon-Orr: you all must have very pinkish lilacs
00:13:49 Vanda Scartezini: hi everyone
00:14:12 Jonathan Zuck: The REAL time connotation is about a deadline, after which the recommendation is useless
00:14:15 Cheryl Langdon-Orr: But then again as I have had proved to me I do not see all colours as others do
00:20:11 Judith Hellerstein: It is purplish pink
00:23:56 Vanda Scartezini: ok thank Alan then I can agree with 3 because I understood we really need to explain how we categorize
00:24:20 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond: Cheryl I am at dinner so hard for me to speak
00:25:07 Cheryl Langdon-Orr: Noted @OCL
00:25:20 Jonathan Zuck: Not really idiot proof. More "pragmatic" in it's implications.
00:25:30 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond: Thanks. All looks good to me from here
00:25:34 Alan Greenberg: Hard to make things idiot-proof because idiots seem to be so innovative!
00:31:27 Jonathan Zuck: Ideally, there are not more than 4 or 5 High++ candidates. Imagine a situation where each group is given the opportunity to submit 4 recs that are for sure going to be implemented. That would be the highest level, I think. Just thinking out loud.
00:31:28 Judith Hellerstein: I think the descriptions of flexible and important that Alan has given are unclear. I agree with him about the first two critical and mission critical
00:31:42 Silvia Vivanco: AI: Group shall create some descriptive negotiation notes, not an actual part of this document
00:31:52 Silvia Vivanco: @Cheryl noted above
00:32:11 Bachollet Sebastien - Euralo: In hight twice “be”
00:37:43 Bachollet Sebastien - Euralo: Is of VERY critical
00:38:36 Jonathan Zuck: I think alan was making qualitative assessment, not a quantitative one
00:38:39 Heidi Ullrich: I will need to drop off now. Silvia will take AIs.
00:39:04 Heidi Ullrich: Thanks;
00:42:42 Silvia Vivanco: Desirable?
00:45:44 Silvia Vivanco: advisable?
00:46:27 Silvia Vivanco: recommendable?
00:47:13 Jonathan Zuck: OBE - overtaken by events
00:48:00 Silvia Vivanco: Desirable but not critically important
00:49:05 Judith Hellerstein: I agree with jonathan but add NA non t applicable or OBE
00:51:19 Silvia Vivanco: Lol See! Its so true
00:51:28 Silvia Vivanco: A French meal is something to enjoy
00:53:07 Vanda Scartezini: those additional are clear and we may need in the future
00:53:17 Cheryl Langdon-Orr: agreed
00:53:26 Susie Johnson: Ai: Add two categories: Not time sensitive and Dangerous
00:53:49 Silvia Vivanco: AI: Susie to add a categories: Dangerous and Not time sensitive
00:55:01 Jonathan Zuck: Not desireable
00:56:37 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond: undesirable is good
00:57:25 Silvia Vivanco: AI: So one category only : " Undesirable" (not dangerous)
00:58:44 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond: well -- isn"t "out of scope" good?
00:59:03 Silvia Vivanco: AI: To come up with a terminology alternative to unimportant
00:59:19 Silvia Vivanco: Alan to come up with such terminology
00:59:52 Vanda Scartezini: define the obvious make it less obvious
01:00:43 Silvia Vivanco: Next week Agenda, everyone to look at the columns and alert any concerns
01:01:06 Silvia Vivanco: Next week call to be schedule by Gisella to confirm if same day - same time is ok
01:01:11 Vanda Scartezini: agree ALAn
01:01:47 Gisella Gruber - ICANN Org: Thanksgiving is on Thursday 25th
01:01:57 Vanda Scartezini: not me
01:02:22 Gisella Gruber - ICANN Org: Quite happy to send THIS group a Doodle poll
01:02:27 Gisella Gruber - ICANN Org: I will be working :-D
01:02:49 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond: thanks Cheryl
01:02:49 Silvia Vivanco: Thank you all!