You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

Date: Thursday, 18 August 2022

Time: 18:00 - 19:30 UTC (for the time in various time zones click here)


How can I participate in this meeting?  

ADIGO Conf ID Please note - change in connection details: for all languages, dial into the Adigo line, press 1638 and the Adigo operator will ask you which language channel you prefer and transfer you to the appropriate language channel.

EN, ES & FR: 1638

Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/92808741463?pwd=aENYMUM4WHpIL2VoNEtIYkQwRVpwQT09  / Password: OFBC#12345 


Action Items: EN         

Zoom Recording: EN

Recording : EN, ES, FR

Zoom Chat: EN    

Transcription: EN, ES, FR


OFB-SC Members

Chair: Holly Raiche

Advisor: Maureen Hilyard 

AFRALO: Aziz Hilali, Dave Kissoondoyal

APRALO: Satish Babu

EURALO: Sébastien Bachollet, Matthias Hudobnik

LACRALO: Harold Arcos, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez

NARALO: Judith Hellerstein, Javier Rúa-Jovet


OFB-WG Participants:

AFRALO:

APRALO: 

EURALO: 

LACRALO:

NARALO: 


Dial out Participants:

EN: 

ES: 

FR: 

Apologies:  Marita Moll, Satish Babu 

Staff: Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco,

ES Interpreters:

FR Interpreters: 

Call Management: TBD


AGENDA  *****Update in Progress*****


  1. Roll call- Staff (2 minutes)

  2. Introduction and Aim of Meeting -  Holly Raiche, Co-Chair of the OFB-WG (3 minutes)

  3. Review of Upcoming Issues for Comment and Plans for OFB-WG Response - Holly /All (30 minutes)

    1. Decision to Respond - Is the issue of relevance to the ALAC? If yes, is the OFB-WG the right WG to develop the statement? If yes, the OFB-WG should draft a statement. 
    2. Statement development - Who should be the penholder/s? Would a presentation by the staff support leads on the public comment be useful? When should the draft statement be reviewed by the OFB-WG?
    3. Review and Ratification by the ALAC - When should the ALAC review and ratify the statement? 

Upcoming OFB Public Comment Proceedings

Pilot Holistic Review Terms of Reference (ToR) OFB-WG

ATRT3 recommendation 3.5 called for the setup of a new Holistic Review. ICANN Board approved the recommendation, and a Pilot Holistic Review Terms of Reference (ToR) Team was formed in February 2022 to draft the ToR with ICANN org’s facilitation. The Pilot Holistic Review ToR Team finished the draft ToR in June 2022. This proceeding seeks community input on the Pilot Holistic Review ToR for the eventual initiation of the Pilot Holistic Review.

Draft IANA and PTI FY24 Operating Plan and Budgets OFB-WG

The Draft IANA and PTI FY24 Operating Plan and Budgets sets forth the focus of effort and organizational commitment for the designated fiscal year. The ICANN Bylaws and PTI Bylaws require the preparation and adoption of an Annual OP&B prior to the start of each fiscal year.


Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) Charter Amendments  OFB-WG

On 9 May 2022, the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns (NPOC) Constituency amended its charter and notified ICANN org of its request for approval by the ICANN Board. This Public Comment proceeding will allow ICANN to obtain community input on proposed amendments to the NPOC charter.


Improved GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency Charter Amendment Process OFB-WG

The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) charter revision process has been updated to reflect the continuous evolution of the ICANN community, ongoing implementation of Specific Review recommendations, and the review role of ICANN Board. These improvements will streamline charter revisions and allow GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies to continue their focus on policy development.


Updates to the GNSO Operating Procedures OFB-WG

Public Comment proceeding to reflect updates to the GNSO Working Group Self-Assessment requirements as well as possible updates to the GNSO Statement of Interest (SOI) procedures and requirements.

NomComRIWG Proposed Changes to Bylaws and Standing Committee Charter OFB-WG

Four (4) recommendations from the Nominating Committee Review require amendments to the ICANN Bylaws. For efficiency, they are grouped together with the draft NomCom Standing Committee Charter, so that the ICANN community and the ICANN Board can follow a single process for the entire group. Note: NomComRIWG is the Nominating Committee Review Implementation Working Group.

4. ICANN75 Operations Update Session - Cheryl  (10 mins)

5. Next Steps and Next Meeting - Holly (5 mins)

6. AoB - Holly (5 mins)




  • No labels