11:58:27 From Michelle DeSmyter - ICANN Org to Everyone:
To follow along with the RTT: https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=ICANN [streamtext.net]
12:00:58 From Marita Moll - Canada to Everyone:
Hi all. Due to a conflict, I can only be here for the first 1/2 hours
12:01:40 From Raymond Mamattah to Everyone:
Good evening from Ghana.
12:02:32 From Michelle DeSmyter - ICANN Org to Everyone:
To follow along with the RTT: https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=ICANN [streamtext.net]
12:03:17 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Action items: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Action+Items+%3A+At-Large+Operations%2C+Finance+and+Budget+Working+Group
12:04:24 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
The 16:00 UTC was the result of a Doodle. The 18:00 UTC was the regular time.
12:06:01 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
So you're saying the APRALO calls don't occur in the middle of the night? ;)
12:06:08 From avri doria to Everyone:
Remain in favor of pain sharing. Have been for many years.
12:06:21 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Reacted to "Remain in favor of p..." with
12:08:03 From Ricardo Holmquist to Everyone:
I can spare 10 minutes from my part
12:08:11 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Apologies for lateness
12:08:58 From Michelle DeSmyter - ICANN Org to Everyone:
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/FY25+At-Large+Funding+Request+Workspace
12:09:50 From NAZMUL HASAN MAJUMDER to Everyone:
Apologies for the late
12:10:02 From Michelle DeSmyter - ICANN Org to Everyone:
To follow along with the RTT: https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=ICANN [streamtext.net]
12:10:28 From Michelle DeSmyter - ICANN Org to Everyone:
No, he is not on
12:10:44 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
This seems to be something that GSE can easily do
12:11:42 From avri doria to Everyone:
well anyone in a car or walking may be challenged to read.
12:11:54 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
The criteria matrix is at: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+FY25+AFR+Criteria+Matrix
12:12:34 From Marita Moll - Canada to Everyone:
I do agree also that this seems to be in the mandate of GSE and they have the resources for that
12:12:40 From Bill Jouris to Everyone:
I would say it IS an form of outreach. To a specific small demographic, but still reaching out to them.
12:13:12 From Pari Esfandiari to Everyone:
I agree with Judith.
12:13:15 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Inclined to agree and seems to fall right into the GSE mission
12:13:21 From avri doria to Everyone:
seesm duplicative
12:13:26 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
I agree it is already fitted to GSE outreach etc.,
12:13:32 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
its outreach focus
12:13:52 From Raymond Mamattah to Everyone:
Shouldn't we have made the applicants to be on the call to give their response, since some of us are here.
12:14:08 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
They should have come to the call
12:14:15 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
if they were interested in it
12:14:42 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
We should judge on the paper we did not ask for a Pitch
12:14:52 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
Reacted to "We should judge on t..." with
12:16:08 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
This one is also outreach
12:16:19 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
It is GSE focused proposal
12:16:24 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
I should be next in que
12:16:26 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
if we are allowing to pitch them then all proposal writer should allow and inform them earlier to join call
12:16:27 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Is this not similar to the Bangladesh request which is similar type of information dissemination to a group that is not normally covered by ICANN GSE
12:16:47 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
@Maureen Hilyard that is what I was saying
12:17:05 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
absilutly agree al these should go to the better optioned place
12:17:35 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
the GSE does not often get to underserved regions and that is where ALSes are helpful
12:17:53 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
@Maureen Hilyard yes but they should
12:18:11 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Reacted to "@Maureen Hilyard yes..." with
12:18:26 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
But also it should be given to the intergovernmental group within ICANN
12:18:51 From Ali AlMeshal to Everyone:
Make sense @Cheryl Langdon-Orr totally agree
12:18:59 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
These are all worthy in the RIGHT place we need to get them to the Right place
12:19:16 From Raymond Mamattah to Everyone:
Please my comment is misunderstood. I am asking that 1. we should have asked the applicants to be on the call to make their defence. 2. because since those of us are here some of us will defend our work. 3. hence we should have invited everyone to be fair to all applicants
12:19:38 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Replying to "Please my comment is..."
Exactly
12:19:54 From Dr. Adebunmi AKINBO to Everyone:
Reacted to Please my comment is... with "
12:19:58 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Does ICANN already support schools of IG or are they all independent?
12:20:37 From Michelle DeSmyter - ICANN Org to Everyone:
To follow along with the RTT: https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=ICANN [streamtext.net]
12:20:39 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Yes it seems a Regional focus (again worthy) but the GSE's NEED to do better
12:21:00 From Marita Moll - Canada to Everyone:
IGs get some $$ from ICANN -- but they need to make a pitch everytime
12:21:05 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
yes
12:21:05 From MICHEL TCHONANG CAPDA to Everyone:
I agree with your point of view, Raymond.
12:21:12 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
IN AP regionwe always found GSE support in regard to school
12:21:25 From Pari Esfandiari to Everyone:
No
12:21:27 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
In defence of the OFBWG, applicants should have made themselves available to come to the meetings especially when they are applying to the WG for a grant application
12:21:27 From Raymond Mamattah to Everyone:
YES
12:21:27 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
NO
12:21:30 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
No
12:21:47 From Bill Jouris to Everyone:
No
12:22:05 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Not for this type of funding
12:22:15 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
it should be supported of course
12:22:25 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
Reacted to "In defence of the OF..." with
12:22:28 From Raymond Mamattah to Everyone:
Every school DOES NOT get funding please.
12:22:46 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
and we should encourage more focus to this things in our general Budget Comments
12:22:49 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Maybe we should have GSE come to talk to us about what their brief is for these types of requests, rather than just assigning these items to their group
12:23:13 From Marita Moll - Canada to Everyone:
Okay, thanks Raymond. I am not totally clear on that and would love to have a clear picture
12:23:21 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Is there another section that these requests can be referred to?
12:23:46 From MICHEL TCHONANG CAPDA to Everyone:
Yes
12:24:31 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Replying to "Is there another sec..."
I was going to mention later Maureen that rather than us saying send it to GSE WE might facilitate a where can these go discussion with the right contacts
12:24:56 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Then it belongs in another source of funding does it not?
12:25:06 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Replying to "Is there another sec..."
Perfect Cheryl
12:25:08 From Dr. Adebunmi AKINBO to Everyone:
Reacted to I was going to menti... with "
12:25:27 From MICHEL TCHONANG CAPDA to Everyone:
Agree Avri
12:25:56 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Replying to "Then it belongs in a..."
and I support the principle of what Avri suggested just not for this finding source
12:26:06 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
Reacted to "and I support the pr..." with
12:26:12 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
Replying to "Then it belongs in a..."
Exactly.
12:26:14 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone
Reacted to "Then it belongs in a..." with
12:27:25 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
That belongs and is drafted at a basic level so can be beefed up in the current PC drafting for the 5y plan
12:27:39 From Dr. Adebunmi AKINBO to Everyone:
Some of the Schools discuss ICANN and its structure.
12:27:46 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Replying to "That belongs and is ..."
Marita you put that in did you not?
12:28:00 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
@JZ, I agree with you, Avri and Cheryl that there should be something ICANN can support somehow
12:28:36 From avri doria to Everyone:
in the Dynamic Coalition for SIGs we have long talked about the need for programs specialized to a segement or a population, But someone has to fund such work that starts out with modifying curricula &c. Pardon, but I spend too much time thinking about SIGs and M14r education
12:28:48 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Replying to "@JZ, I agree with yo..."
We should build this into a suitable project IMO
12:28:49 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
Agree marita
12:28:56 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Reacted to "in the Dynamic Coali..." with
12:29:08 From avri doria to Everyone:
so if we wanted one specialize to ICANN needs, this could be such a program.
12:29:12 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Reacted to "Agree marita" with
12:29:19 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Reacted to "so if we wanted one ..." with
12:29:26 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Reacted to "so if we wanted one ..." with
12:29:31 From Dr. Adebunmi AKINBO to Everyone:
Recently, focus also shifted into Universal Acceptance and the role of IG in ensuring such the right policies. My opinion from managing the Nigeria arm.
12:29:35 From Justine Chew to Everyone:
Reacted to "Recently, focus also..." with
12:29:40 From Justine Chew to Everyone:
Removed a reaction from "Recently, focus also..."
12:29:40 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
Reacted to "so if we wanted one ..." with
12:29:44 From Justine Chew to Everyone:
Reacted to "so if we wanted one ..." with
12:29:49 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
not whether they do ANYTHING specific to ICANN but it's not the focus. But contextualizing ICANN could be very important, if done around the world
12:29:58 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Reacted to "not whether they do ..." with
12:30:28 From Dr. Adebunmi AKINBO to Everyone:
Replying to "not whether they do ..."
https://sig.ng/learn
12:30:29 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
still outreach
12:30:45 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
another idea in the wrong place
12:30:50 From Lavish to Everyone:
Reacted to not whether they do ... with "
12:31:04 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Again, I wonder if some kind of virtual event could be more strategic
12:31:20 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Reacted to "Again, I wonder if s..." with
12:31:32 From Bill Jouris to Everyone:
Replying to "another idea in the ..."
Specifically, another good idea in the wrong place
12:31:37 From Raymond Mamattah to Everyone:
Nine ICANN courses are done, isn't that ICANN specific?
12:31:37 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Outreach and just 1 Region
12:31:51 From Michelle DeSmyter - ICANN Org to Claire Craig(Direct Message):
Hi Claire - I did ask the interpreters if they could stay past the end time and they are able too. I am still waiting on a response from the captioner. Just wanted to let you know if this meeting happens to go over they can stay. ;)
12:31:59 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
While the aspiration is to have applications of global reach, most applicants are ALses whose focus is regional but it has the potential to be replicable globally
12:32:19 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
Yes outreach and only one region
12:32:23 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
its seems like GA
12:32:38 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Again outreach and to single Region
12:32:43 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Interesting @Maureen Hilyard, I wonder if they should be posed as "pilots"
12:32:43 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
But these is supposed to replace ABRs
12:33:06 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Replying to "But these is suppose..."
are supposed.. :)
12:33:18 From Justine Chew to Everyone:
Replying to "But these is suppose..."
Not really
12:33:20 From Dr. Adebunmi AKINBO to Everyone:
Noted.
12:33:23 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
The thing to remember is that ABRs, and the budget associated with them, are gone. This is the "replacemehnt" but likely to be even harder to get.
12:33:37 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
I'll cover my ears
12:33:46 From Michelle DeSmyter - ICANN Org to Everyone:
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/FY25+At-Large+Funding+Request+Workspace
12:33:49 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Replying to "But these is suppose..."
it is an evolution not a duplication of a concreted process though Maureen
12:33:58 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Replying to "But these is suppose..."
So where do ALSes apply for regional proposals?
12:34:12 From Pari Esfandiari to Everyone:
Yes from me
12:34:20 From Justine Chew to Everyone:
Replying to "But these is suppose..."
For outreach proposal, go to their GSE
12:34:24 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
ALAC and Regional Leaders
12:34:24 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Has multi Regional spread
12:34:49 From Marita Moll - Canada to Everyone:
Would certainly benefit the whole community
12:34:55 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
and other groups have them, GAC, GNSO, etc.
12:35:04 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
This seems like a go through to try for in this budget source
12:35:21 From Marita Moll - Canada to Everyone:
Yes, other groups have them. I have always wondered why we didn't
12:35:23 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
THIS one gets a Yes from me
12:35:38 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
Its meets all metrix
12:35:41 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
yes
12:35:49 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Reacted to "Its meets all metrix" with
12:35:58 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Hope, unlike the others, to piggyback on AGM, to minimize incremental costs
12:36:12 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
you need a proper Day on this sirt of thing AGREED'
12:36:13 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Replying to "But these is suppose..."
Only if they had the foresight that ABRs were not going to be available when they did their outreach plans for this year
12:36:16 From Bill Jouris to Everyone:
YES. Nothing really replaces meeting face to face. And this minimizes the cost by not needing travel (even though it would still entail hotel)
12:36:22 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Reacted to "YES. Nothing really..." with
12:36:25 From Justine Chew to Everyone:
Leadership of At-Large, not just ALAC
12:36:32 From Ali AlMeshal to Everyone:
Yes for me
12:36:39 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Replying to "YES. Nothing really..."
Yes it is cost effective
12:36:56 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Reacted to "Leadership of At-Lar..." with
12:36:57 From Stephen Dakyi to Everyone:
Reacted to "YES. Nothing really..." with
12:37:13 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
Reacted to "YES. Nothing really..." with
12:37:15 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Reacted to "you need a proper Da..." with
12:37:29 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Reacted to "Hope, unlike the oth..." with
12:37:40 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Reacted to "Leadership of At-Lar..." with
12:38:02 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Great point, Seb. Might require a separate venue
12:38:14 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
and that is OK too
12:38:15 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
Yes a good one
12:39:15 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
Yes nomcom staff are often forgotten
12:39:29 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
CIP is a good improvement Seb
12:40:08 From Bill Jouris to Everyone:
Doing it before would mean that our brains wouldn't be fried going in
12:40:18 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Does ICANN still run their leadership training sessions that take leaders from across the communities?
12:40:25 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Difference between the GNSO strategic planning days separate to an ICANN Meeting and one that is ALAC and RALO leads is that GNSO Council is the ALAC equivalent
12:40:50 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
+1 Justine
12:40:55 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Replying to "Difference between t..."
so that model may remove RALO Leads from the mix by simple comparison
12:41:02 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
@Maureen Hilyard , yes, the Academy Leadership Program meets prior to the Community Forum.
12:41:13 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Board Rep makes sense AGree Justine
12:41:17 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
+1 justine
12:41:43 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Replying to "@Maureen Hilyard , y..."
Great to see that it still exists. Have we been sending people to it?
12:41:51 From Marita Moll - Canada to Everyone:
Have to leave now, sorry. I have organized a meeting for our ALS to respond to the WSIS+20 questionnaire for community stakeholders. I hope others are thinking about this. Deadline Jan. 31
12:41:52 From Raymond Mamattah to Everyone:
This meeting could be done online with staff support☺️, Same value
12:42:11 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Good point, Cheryl. Let's find ways to make it cheaper and more inclusive
12:42:19 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
+1 to CLO
12:42:38 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
it's not justthe headcount it is the roles
12:42:52 From Justine Chew to Everyone:
Yes Cheryl. I wouldn't ask for a separate meeting. Tying it to an AGM makes sense.
12:42:57 From MICHEL TCHONANG CAPDA to Everyone:
Agree Cheryl
12:43:35 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
remember things become precedent and if that runs then a GNSO Strategy day would include Leads from ALL the C, SGs etc.,
12:43:46 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
I like it!
12:43:51 From Sébastien Bachollet to Everyone:
GNSO Council = 21 members
12:43:51 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
This is a YES
12:44:07 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
Yes
12:44:14 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Replying to "GNSO Council = 21 me..."
not just the headcount matters SeB
12:45:04 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Replying to "I like it!"
JZ's submission
12:45:08 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Different audience Judith
12:45:16 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Reacted to "Different audience J..." with
12:45:34 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
We did a pilot
12:45:41 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
indeed @Justine Chew follows nicely
12:45:42 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
we need that survey
12:45:51 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
I think that it is good but also want to get at Interests of end users
12:45:58 From Raymond Mamattah to Everyone:
Good proposal
12:46:22 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Replying to "I like it!"
Especially as an intro/program setting for the next Summit
12:46:26 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
extremely valuable data
12:46:45 From Stephen Dakyi to Everyone:
Agree with these proposal
12:46:47 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
yes it will give opportunity to engage
12:46:54 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
Yes I like that additions
12:47:22 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
+1 bill
12:47:29 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
every few years agree @Bill Jouris
12:47:29 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
+1 Bill. Around ATLASs, perhaps
12:47:34 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Reacted to "+1 Bill. Around ATLA..." with
12:47:37 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
+1 Bill
12:47:41 From Bill Jouris to Everyone:
Yes, indeed
12:47:41 From MICHEL TCHONANG CAPDA to Everyone:
Yes Bill
12:48:12 From Pari Esfandiari to Everyone:
I support this proposal.
12:49:00 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
The two approved will be reviewed by the ALAC on next week’s call.
12:49:12 From Dr. Adebunmi AKINBO to Everyone:
Well done @Claire Craig
12:49:21 From Dr. Adebunmi AKINBO to Everyone:
Great work everyone.
12:49:46 From Michelle DeSmyter - ICANN Org to Everyone:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BrPE0pgpym4T4ZuFlgGnXVA7g31GsyShYmSfEvOFSC0/edit
12:49:53 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
@Claire Craig we might want to consider if we can facilitate the ones not going through this process to get to the right place for greater success
12:50:09 From Dr. Adebunmi AKINBO to Everyone:
Reacted to @Claire Craig we mig... with "
12:50:10 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Replying to "@Claire Craig we mig..."
rather than just toss them back with advice
12:50:16 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Reacted to "@Claire Craig we mig..." with
12:50:48 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Did the clarifying questions go to the PC?
12:51:46 From Bukola Oronti to Everyone:
Reacted to @Claire Craig we mig... with "
12:51:55 From Michelle DeSmyter - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Hand up by Cheryl
12:52:12 From Justine Chew to Everyone:
Replying to "@Claire Craig we mig..."
A note to the 2 RALO Leaderships saying OFBWG support these, just that AFR is the wrong budgetary path, so please take them up with their GSE.
12:52:22 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
@Cheryl Langdon-Orr yes I was looking for that and could not find it
12:53:26 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
it annoyed that with weekly meetings and LOTS going on in ALL our lives
12:53:32 From Justine Chew to Everyone:
only 3? LOL
12:54:07 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
if we need more time then take more time between the item being on the Agenda or change the meeting cadence
12:54:39 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
This one is simpler of course
12:55:01 From Michelle DeSmyter - ICANN Org to Everyone:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dn3ujYLF4V8RTsGzUijpiSrRGsrGx_nF85u4CakLBaE/edit
12:56:57 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Reacted to "A note to the 2 RALO..." with
12:57:47 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
the Group part of the WORKING Group
12:57:59 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Reacted to "the Group part of th..." with
12:58:16 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
as leads you can of course reach out and even delegate
12:58:36 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
For AOB the OFB-WG matter there is a need for some feedback for this CIP-CCG call SeB was referring to as we need to arrange for feedback for the next meeting of that group on Feb 7 relating to ALAC and RALO status activities plans etc., regarding our own Continuous Improvement Programming... My suggestion is that as time is tight on this the OFB-WG sets up another Small Team (ST) of the Representatives and alternates attending the CIP-CCG to work with staff
12:59:24 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
It is a 60 min session at ICANN79
12:59:33 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
Reacted to "For AOB the OFB-WG m..." with
12:59:40 From Michelle DeSmyter - ICANN Org to Everyone:
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ICANN79+Policy+and+Priority+Topic+Proposal+Workspace
12:59:41 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
We can go over a bit today
13:00:16 From Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org to Everyone:
ALAC meeting is the 23rd.
13:00:53 From MICHEL TCHONANG CAPDA to Everyone:
Thanks all bye bye
13:00:56 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Thanks all Bye for now then.
13:00:57 From Ali AlMeshal to Everyone:
bye all
13:01:03 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Great meeting Claire and Ricardo
13:01:05 From Bukola Oronti to Everyone:
Thank you everyone
13:01:07 From Pari Esfandiari to Everyone:
Thank you all
13:01:12 From Dr. Adebunmi AKINBO to Everyone:
Bye and well done everyone
13:01:15 From Stephen Dakyi to Everyone:
Thanks All
13:01:16 From Shah Rahman to Everyone:
Thank you
AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
ALAC Liaisons and Representatives
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
