Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Action Items: EN         

Zoom Recording: EN

Recording : EN EN, ES ES, FR FR

Zoom Chat: EN    

Transcription: EN, ES, FR

...

OFB-SC Members

Chair: Holly  Holly Raiche

Advisor: Maureen Hilyard 

AFRALO: Aziz Hilali, Dave Kissoondoyal

APRALO: Satish Babu (apology)

EURALO: Sébastien  Sébastien Bachollet, Matthias   Matthias Hudobnik

LACRALO: Harold Arcos, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez

NARALO: Judith  Judith Hellerstein, Javier Rúa-Jovet


OFB-WG Participants:

...

APRALO: 

EURALO: 

LACRALO:

NARALO: 

...

Dial out Participants:

EN: Holly Raiche, Sebastien Bachollet, Ricardo Holmquist, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Bill Jouris, Lavish Mawuena Mensah, Michel Tchonang Linze, Naveed Bin Rais, Raymond Mamattah, Judith Hellerstein,

ES: none

FR: none

Apologies:  Marita Moll, Satish Babu Babu, Vanda Scartezini, Chantelle Doerksen (staff)

Staff: Heidi Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Michelle DeSmyter

ES Interpreters: Lillian & Paula

FR Interpreters:  Jacques & Claire

Call Management: TBD Michelle DeSmyter

...

AGENDA 

...

 

  1. Roll call- Staff (2

    minutes

    mins)

  2. Introduction

    Welcome and

    Aim

    Review of

    Meeting

    the Agenda -

     

    Holly

    Raiche, Co-Chair of the OFB-WG

    (3

    minutes

    mins)

    Review of Upcoming Issues for Comment and Plans for OFB-WG Response - Holly /All (30 minutes)

  3. Decision to Respond - Is the issue of relevance to the ALAC? If yes, is the OFB-WG the right WG to develop the statement? If yes, the OFB-WG should draft a statement. 
  4. Statement development - Who should be the penholder/s? Would a presentation by the staff support leads on the public comment be useful? When should the draft statement be reviewed by the OFB-WG?
  5. Review and Ratification by the ALAC - When should the ALAC review and ratify the statement? 
  6. Planning for the ICANN75 At-Large Operations Session  – Holly and All  (20 mins)

a. A 90 min session on Sunday, 18 September

b. Proposed Draft Agenda

        1. Introduction
        2. Update on the Annual Cycle of commenting Budget/initiatives - Holly
        3. Comments on IANA/PTI Budget and ICANN Budget – Ricardo
        4. Operating Initiatives of importance to ALAC
          1. MSM – Marita
          2. Universal Acceptance – Satish. Other Operating initiatives of importance to ALAC
          3. ABRs – How they need to tie into ICANN’s strategy and priorities
          4. Subgroup prioritization – Cheryl 
        5. Wrap up and Next Steps

       4. Update on Sub-group Prioritization Activities – Cheryl (10 mins)

       5. Upcoming Issues for Comment and Forward Planning - Holly/All (20 mins)

Upcoming OFB Public Comment Proceedings

Card
labelAugust (4)

Pilot Holistic Review Terms of Reference (ToR)

Status
colourGreen
titleOFB-WG

ATRT3 recommendation 3.5 called for the setup of a new Holistic Review. ICANN Board approved the recommendation, and a Pilot Holistic Review Terms of Reference (ToR) Team was formed in February 2022 to draft the ToR with ICANN org’s facilitation. The Pilot Holistic Review ToR Team finished the draft ToR in June 2022. This proceeding seeks community input on the Pilot Holistic Review ToR for the eventual initiation of the Pilot Holistic Review.

@OFB-WG has reviewed and notes that a proposed DRAFT Text for use as Comment is being prepared by the 'OFB-Prioritization Sub Team' Cheryl Langdon-Orr Sebastien Bachollet as liaisons for OFB-WG : PST on this topic. 

PC is not yet open 

Open <Insert date>        Closes <Insert date> 

Review  <Insert date>    Ratify <Insert date> 



Card
labelSeptember (6)

Draft IANA and PTI FY24 Operating Plan and Budgets 

Status
colourGreen
titleOFB-WG

The Draft IANA and PTI FY24 Operating Plan and Budgets sets forth the focus of effort and organizational commitment for the designated fiscal year. The ICANN Bylaws and PTI Bylaws require the preparation and adoption of an Annual OP&B prior to the start of each fiscal year.

@OFB-WG has reviewed and proposed DRAFT Text for use as ALAC Comment is being prepared for OFB-WG with @  @ @  as penholders

PC is not yet open 

Open <Insert date>        Closes <Insert date> 

Review  <Insert date>    Ratify <Insert date> 



Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) Charter Amendments  

Status
colourGreen
titleOFB-WG

On 9 May 2022, the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns (NPOC) Constituency amended its charter and notified ICANN org of its request for approval by the ICANN Board. This Public Comment proceeding will allow ICANN to obtain community input on proposed amendments to the NPOC charter.

Cheryl Langdon-Orr has reviewed and recommends NO Comment is required. 

PC is not yet open

Open <Insert date>        Closes <Insert date> 

Review  <Insert date>    Ratify <Insert date> 


Improved GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency Charter Amendment Process

Status
colourGreen
titleOFB-WG

The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) charter revision process has been updated to reflect the continuous evolution of the ICANN community, ongoing implementation of Specific Review recommendations, and the review role of ICANN Board. These improvements will streamline charter revisions and allow GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies to continue their focus on policy development.

Cheryl Langdon-Orr has reviewed and recommends NO Comment is required.

PC is not yet open

Open <Insert date>        Closes <Insert date> 

Review  <Insert date>    Ratify <Insert date> 


Updates to the GNSO Operating Procedures 

Status
colourGreen
titleOFB-WG

Public Comment proceeding to reflect updates to the GNSO Working Group Self-Assessment requirements as well as possible updates to the GNSO Statement of Interest (SOI) procedures and requirements.

Cheryl Langdon-Orr  has reviewed and recommends NO Comment is required, but if anything, a short supportive statement for the changes being made would suffice. 

PCis not yet open 

Open <Insert date>        Closes <Insert date> 

Review  <Insert date>    Ratify <Insert date> 



Card
labelOctober (2)

NomComRIWG Proposed Changes to Bylaws and Standing Committee Charter

Status
colourGreen
titleOFB-WG

Four (4) recommendations from the Nominating Committee Review require amendments to the ICANN Bylaws. For efficiency, they are grouped together with the draft NomCom Standing Committee Charter, so that the ICANN community and the ICANN Board can follow a single process for the entire group. Note: NomComRIWG is the Nominating Committee Review Implementation Working Group.

4. ICANN75 Operations Update Session - Cheryl  (10 mins)

5. Next Steps and Next Meeting - Holly (5 mins)

Cheryl Langdon-Orr has reviewed and recommends that a statement in support of the ByLaws changes Comment is required, noting the close involvement and active engagement of several members of our community throughout this process of developing and drafting these changes.

@@@  as penholders. 

PC is not yet open  

Open <Insert date>        Closes <Insert date> 

Review  <Insert date>    Ratify <Insert date> 

6. Wrap-up and Next Steps

...

- Holly (5 mins)