...

ATLAS II Thematic Group Allocation

Subject Matter Experts

...

Thematic Group Leadership Teams

IMPORTANT: Please click on the individual thematic group titles to see their leadership teams as well as abstracts and questions to be addressedSubject Matter Experts will lead and coordinate session content and output.

Wolf: 

--> To formulate 3 to 5 related sub-questions on your topic that should be part of the ATLAS II discussions during these breakout sessions. These sub-questions will be also included in our Workspace for the community to prepare and follow up on this.

 4. ICANN Transparency and Accountability

 Hong Xue:

(1) Are the current ICANN appeal mechanisms (IRP and reconsideration process) working? 

(2) What is your proposal for future reform? 

...

Responsibilities of the Thematic Group Leadership Teams:

Subject Matter Experts will provide background information about the topics discussed in your group. They will answer any question you have about the topics and give you some of the history and facts. They are here to help you.

Moderators will facilitate the discussion among the participants in the group and to stimulate good debate and discussion. The Moderators will also be making sure the group progresses in its discussions and conclusions.

See: ATLAS-II_moderation-criteria.pdf

Reporters/Rapporteurs will listen to all of the discussions and their responsibility will be to work with the group in drafting a final Statement that the group will be designing.

See: ATLAS-II_reporting-criteria.pdf

...

Notes from Christopher Wilkinson concerning all Thematic Groups.

...

Coordination calls:

Friday, 06 June 2014

Friday, 30 May 2014

4. ICANN Transparency and Accountability

Hong Xue: ATRT Final Recommendations #9 generally reflects the community feed backs and contains the improvements. Rec.9.2 is particularly important for accountability of decision-making process and reform of appeal mechanism. It is insightful to form a SCG to examine the options to restructure the current IRP and reconsideration process. But it is still unclear whether the review/restructure will cover the other "appeal" mechanisms in various gTLDs and ccTLDs processes, such as the objection procedures in the new gTLD program and apply for review procedure in IDN ccTLD program. It is especially unclear whether IRP and reconsideration process will be the "final" appeal channel available to review any other appeal decisions, either from internal bodies or outside service providers.

Session Moderation

Session Reporting

...

1. The future of multistakeholderism

...