MtgDateDecision
#9

 

Interim leadership is confirmed to continue leading the full review (Alan Greenberg as Chair – Cathrin Bauer-Bulst and Susan Kawaguchi as Vice Chairs) 

#9

 

Subgroups have a target of completing their recommendations by San Juan (ICANN61) 

#9

 

Time of plenary call to be discussed after Abu Dhabi 

#9

 

The ICANN60 informal meeting is confirmed for October 31 – 12:15-13:15 

#9

  

Review Team reached preliminary agreements on scope, to be reflected in an updated Scope and Objectives table for review and insertion into ToR 

#8

Face-to-face meeting agenda has been approved.
#6

 

On timeline (cf Fact Sheet): agreement to publicize 12-month timeframe

#6

 

On scope: IDN: Within Scope, with minimal effort on it.
#6

 

On scope - Calton’s issue to “assess the value and timing of RDAP as a replacement protocol is suitable, a low effort one and will be included in the review, the wording will be refined slightly.

#6

 

On scope - Compliance is within scope, and Review Team will take a look at it deeper.

#6

 

On scope - Review will evaluate whether RDAP should be implemented before policy is developed. 

#6

 

On scope - Review Team won't be addressing GNSO suggestion "Assess how RDS current & future recommendations might be improved and better coordinated" 

#6

 

On scope: On OECD, Review Team will conduct: simple review noting that there are issues and pointing at other groups which have more in-depth on the issue, and may consider recommending that it be dropped or replaced for future reviews

#6

 

On scope as per the Bylaws section 4.6.e.ii: Review Team agreed to treat separately:

    • the effectiveness of the now current gTLD registry directory service and
    • whether its implementation meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement, promoting consumer trust and safeguarding registrant data.

The team also agreed that it may be useful to draw on the first WHOIS Review Team Scope of Work discussions for guidance on further defining the criterion of effectiveness.

#5

 

Review Team adopts proposed decision-making methodology on Terms of Reference

#4

 

Review Team Members are expected to prepare questions in advance of implementation briefings and to share with ICANN org/presenters beforehand.
#4

 

On observers - Review Team adopts SSR2 approach with caveat that adjustments may be made, as needed.
#3

 

RT agreed to bi-weekly 90 minute calls and to plan agenda for 60 minutes with option to run over, as needed.
#2

RT agreed to interim leadership structure.

#2

RT confirmed its first Face-to-Face: October 2-3 2017. RT members will be contacted by ICANN Constituency Travel to make their arrangements and other meeting details to be sent out to Review Team by Staff Support.

#2

 

RT discussed holding a formal meeting at ICANN60 and determined that an informal meeting of those who will be attending the ICANN might be a better option depending on the number of RT members who are already attending the ICANN meeting. 

---

Day 1 – Monday, 2 October | 09:00 – 17:30 CET | 07:00 – 15:30 UTC (timezone converter)

  • No labels