Terri Agnew:Dear all, welcome to the At-Large Ad-hoc WG on the Transition of US Government Stewardship of the IANA Function on Tuesday, 02 December 2014 at 13:30 UTC

  Terri Agnew:meeting page: https://community.icann.org/x/5YAHAw

  Kathy Schnitt:Welcome Tijani and Glenn

  Glenn McKnight:Hi

  Glenn McKnight:Not  yet in Oshawa -Gordon

  Gordon Chillcott:Starts later this morning, I hear, Glenn. 

  Glenn McKnight:Glad it's not  Buffalo

  Gordon Chillcott:There is that

  Eduardo Diaz:¡Hola a todos?

  Yasuichi Kitamura:hi, all

  Kathy Schnitt:Welcome all!

  Eduardo Diaz:IF cold and windy come to Puerto Rico - 28 degreess with a nice sea breeze

  Alberto Soto:Hi all!

  Jimmy Schulz:Hi all

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Hi Jimmy

  Seun Ojedeji:Hi

  Heidi Ullrich:Welcome, All!

  Heidi Ullrich:Action Items from  26 November - https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Ad-hoc+WG+on+the+Transition+of+US+Government+Stewardship+of+the+IANA+Function+2014-11-26+Action+Items

  Heidi Ullrich:The RFP was not mandatory.  The 2011/2012 RFP was the first since the contract was awarded in 2000. Information on how the NTIA determined to move to an RFP can be seen at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/page/iana-functions-purchase-order, including the Notice of Inquiry and Further Notice of Inquiry, as well as the RFPs.

  Jimmy Schulz:The link doesnt work

  Heidi Ullrich:Try this: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/page/iana-functions-purchase-order

  Heidi Ullrich:It opens for me

  Jimmy Schulz:the error is the "," at the moment

  Jimmy Schulz:at the end

  Yasuichi Kitamura:The URL has worked.

  Alberto Soto:LACNIC   http://www.lacnic.net/en/web/transicion/inicioAFRINIC http://meeting.afrinic.net/afrinic-21/en/vodIETF  http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response/

  Alberto Soto:sorry  LACNIC   http://www.lacnic.net/en/web/transicion/inicio

  Alberto Soto:AFRINIC http://meeting.afrinic.net/afrinic-21/en/vod

  Alberto Soto:IETF  http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response/

  Kathy Schnitt:IETF TRANSITION Proposal: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/2014-November/000721.html

  Eduardo Diaz:Gracias Alberto.

  Kathy Schnitt:@Olivier, Suen is now connected via audio.

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Thank you Kathy. Seun you are next!

  Alberto Soto:@Eduardo, de nada!

  Kathy Schnitt:Welcome Tom Lowenhaupt

  Kathy Schnitt:@Olivier, Cheryl needed to drop for another call.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:I will stay in AC from my tablet connecting soon...

  Kathy Schnitt:Thank  you Cheryl

  Jean-Jacques Subrenat:Hello All, managed to get home earlier than expected.

  Kathy Schnitt:Welcome Jean-Jacques

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Welcome Jean Jacques!

  Jean-Jacques Subrenat:Thanks!

  Glenn McKnight:Hi Jean Jacques

  Seun Ojedeji:looks like once i changed to agree, raising back my hand took me down the queue ;)

  Kathy Schnitt:Welcome Loris Taylor

  loris taylor:Thank you.  Had trouble logging in this morning.

  Glenn McKnight:Many stakeholders  are A. not  aware of the process  B  Lack of action by organizations to get involved.   Not  unusual  that many groups are not coopted into the process. 

  Alan Greenberg:I think the word "periodic" is pretty well gone now.

  Seun Ojedeji:I missed over 40min of this session but i hope i will be able to catch-up

  Seun Ojedeji:yeah @Alan...and the fact that its now Multistakeholder group makes it more complicated

  Jean-Jacques Subrenat:@Alan, yes that's true, that model is the only one really envisaged at this stage.

  Jean-Jacques Subrenat:@Olivier, what's the gist of that exchange?

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Bertrand"s point is that a contracting corp. is not needed and MoUs could be used instead

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:both IETF & W3C are not incorporated bodies

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:his point was that MoUs had been signed by IETF Chair so ther was no need to have incorporated bodies to sign MoUs

  Jean-Jacques Subrenat:@Olivier, that's something some of us discussed on the Board, ca. 2007-08, a series of mutual undertakings.

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Greg's point was that a MoU *was* a contract. so same as contract. And can only be signed by legal representatives of legal bodies and that any non incorporated body brought in the personal liability of its "members"

  Alan Greenberg:I am afraid that I think that this entire discussion of who can sign an MoU is a waste of time.

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Jean-Jacques -- I remind you of this: http://archive.icann.org/en/psc/

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:A very important archive which nobody in the CWG have looked at yet but I am planning on introducing it soon

  Jean-Jacques Subrenat:@Olivier: yes, I know.

  Jean-Jacques Subrenat:@Olivier: good idea.

  Glenn McKnight:I have no idea what  Seun was  speaking about

  Seun Ojedeji:Sorry Glen

  Seun Ojedeji:Glenn

  Seun Ojedeji:what part was it you had no Idea about

  Seun Ojedeji:all of it?

  loris taylor:I agree with Alan. 

  Seun Ojedeji:I guess i should summarise my point, which is that MOU can be more lightweight than contract (without need to have an RFP)

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:less than 3 is impractical

  Eduardo Diaz:5 years sound like the best

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:5 or indeed up to 8 works

  Seun Ojedeji:That will remove the need to have to estabish a contracting entity...then we focus on the MRT part

  Eduardo Diaz:Only if there is a need to be done. If everyone is happy with the operation why doing a RFP

  Glenn McKnight:Renewable  contract  based upon performance  indicators

  Glenn McKnight:IF  benchmarks are met than automatic  renewal  Five Years is a good number

  Gordon Chillcott:Agree wiht Glenn here

  Alan Greenberg:Change for the sake of change is a dangerous thing. If you change suppliers, there is always the chance that the new one fails!

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:agreed @alan

  Gordon Chillcott:I have to agree with Alan here.   This is a personal opinion, by the way

  Seun Ojedeji:i am either way

  Seun Ojedeji:anything is fine for me

  Jean-Jacques Subrenat:@Olivier, is it necessary? Obviously, the national authority (USG) will in any case not relinquish oversight if...

  Alan Greenberg:An issue that has not had much focus here is what would happen if at some point, the contract IS taken from ICANN. There is pretty strong evidence that the ccTLD community is in ICANN because of IANA. If IANA departs, then there is a good chance that the ccNSO does as well. And it is not clear how viable ICANN would be at that point.

  Seun Ojedeji:well do we need to worry about that @Alan

  Tijani BEN JEMAA:Absolutly

  Jimmy Schulz:mompl

  Jimmy Schulz:no i found the mute button

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Seun: There textis here: "The transition must not take place until:    the requisite accountability mechanisms have been identified by the CWG on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (“Accountability CCWG”),    mechanisms that the community determines are necessary pre-transition have been put in place and    agreements and other guarantors are in place to ensure timely implementation of mechanisms that the Accountability CCWG decides may be implemented post-transition".

  Jimmy Schulz:now

  Jimmy Schulz:ok i calling in

  loris taylor:ICANN accountability is key to public perception. 

  Jimmy Schulz:i will dial in

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Thanks Jimmy we'll come back to you

  Seun Ojedeji:Those mechanisms are not applicable since the proposed solution is expected to kick-in after NTIA withdraws

  Kathy Schnitt:@ Jimmy we can dial out to you.

  Glenn McKnight:@Loris  this  is correct as long as the accountability processes are rigerous  and compliant to best practices ie. Transparency International   etc

  Jimmy Schulz:i´ll try again, seems to work now...

  Glenn McKnight:@Seun  you make a good point as to the timelines of implementation

  Kathy Schnitt:@Jimmy if you are stil having issues private chat me your phone number and Adigo can dial out to you

  Glenn McKnight:Very  clear  Jimmy

  loris taylor:I agreethat the accountability mechanisms must be installed pre-transition, not post transition.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:deffinatly a real risk @Jimmy

  Seun Ojedeji:lost audio

  Kathy Schnitt:@ Suen we are dialing back out to you

  Seun Ojedeji:back in ..thanks

  Kathy Schnitt:@Olivier Interpreters can stay for another 10 minutes

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:thank you Kathy! Thank you interpreters!

  Alberto Soto:Sorry, I must go to the meeting...

  Jean-Jacques Subrenat:I have to sign off now. Goodbye all!

  Alberto Soto:Good bye!!

  Kathy Schnitt:Thank you Alberto and Jean- Jacquees

  Heidi Ullrich:Workspace on PC - https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=50823522

  Seun Ojedeji:thanks

  Seun Ojedeji:bye for now

  Jimmy Schulz:thx

  Tom Lowenhaupt:Good meeting everyone.

  Glenn McKnight:bye all

  loris taylor:Thank you for the substantive call.  Tuesday works

  Glenn McKnight:@ loris  do you have some time to chat on SKYPE?

  loris taylor:Hi Glenn, Not today, heading out to catch my flight.  Friday?

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:thanks OCK,  Thanks all bye for now...

  Glenn McKnight:sure  what  time"

  Gordon Chillcott:Bye now.

  loris taylor:8am works for me

  Glenn McKnight:ok  

  Glenn McKnight:speak on friday

  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Thanks very much to the interpreters!

  Glenn McKnight:bye all

  Kathy Schnitt:Thank you all and havea a great evening, morning or afternoon.

  • No labels