Timeline
27 Nov 2012 | Tabling of Key Decision Points to the ALAC |
05 Dec 2012 | Deadline for submission of Application and Statement of Interest by candidates to the ATRT2 staff |
10 Dec 2012 | Deadline for ALAC comments on candidate assessment matrix |
10 Dec 2012 | Deadline for Ad-Hoc Sub-Committee formation |
11-15 Dec 2012 | Ad-Hoc Sub-Committee discussion and agreement on matrix proxy indicators |
12 Dec 2012 | Deadline for receiving list of ALAC candidates from ATRT2 Staff |
20 Dec 2012 | Deadline for Ad-Hoc Sub-Committee members to submit individual assessment |
21 Dec 2012 | Staff aggregates and circulates results to Ad-Hoc Sub-Committee members |
03 Jan 2012 | Ad-Hoc Sub Committee Meeting to review results and decide on candidate preference ranking |
04 Jan 2013 | Announcement and submission of ALAC endorsement decision to the ATRT2 Staff |
07 Jan 2013 | ATRT2 candidate selection by ICANN Board Chair and GAC Chair |
ALAC ATRT2 Candidate Endorsement: Assessment Matrix
Subjective Ranking 1-5 (5 highest, 1 lowest)
Name of Reviewer: | ||||||
Evaluation Criteria | Proxy Indicators (Actual Proxy Indicators to be developed by Ad-Hoc Sub-Committee) | Candidate 1 Name Link to Application | Candidate 2 Name Link to Application | Candidate 3 Name Link to Application | ||
0. Completed application including filed SOI by 5 Dec 2012 |
| Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No | ||
1. Accountability to the ALAC and At-Large | Elected or appointed to the ALAC/Leadership roles |
|
|
| ||
2. Trusted by the Community | Known to the ALAC & At-Large community/Leadership roles with no recall/Extended leadership roles |
|
|
| ||
3. Knowledge of ICANN and its working practices and culture | Years engaging ICANN/Cross-community experiences |
|
|
| ||
4. Knowledge of the Subject Area of Review | Years of experience/Opinion leader or considered as an expert |
|
|
| ||
5. Team spirit, adaptability, consensus-seeking attitude | Peer Ranking |
|
|
| ||
6. Willingness to learn | Peer Ranking |
|
|
| ||
7. Capacity to reason objectively, putting aside personal opinions or preconceptions | Peer Ranking |
|
|
| ||
8. Analytical skills | Successfully drafted (or contributed input to) statements/reports that required analysis of data/information |
|
|
| ||
9. Ability to interpret quantitative and qualitative evidence | Successfully drafted (or contributed input to) statements/reports involving complex issues that required an understanding of qualitative and quantitative data |
|
|
| ||
10. Capacity to draw conclusions purely based on evidence | Peer Ranking |
|
|
| ||
12. Commitment to devote sufficient personal time to review process | Demonstration of sufficient time commitment in other areas of work |
|
|
| ||
| Total Ranking | ||||||
| Overall Comments (optional) | ||||||
