Date: Wednesday, 06 April 2022
Time: 13:00 - 14:30 UTC (for the time in various time zones click here)
How can I participate in this meeting?
Please note - change in connection details: for all languages, dial into the Adigo line, press 1638 and the Adigo operator will ask you which language channel you prefer and transfer you to the appropriate language channel.
English Conference ID = 1638
Spanish Conference ID = 1638
French Conference ID = 1638
Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/765717566?pwd=UTJCdWRSZVdJNEhOYW02OVBqQVQ1Zz09
Passcode: #CPWG2345*
RTT Link: https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=ICANN
Action Items: EN
Recording: EN, ES, FR
Zoom Recording: EN
Zoom Chat: EN
Participants:
EN: Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Jonathan Zuck, Gordon Chillcott, Lutz Donnerhacke, Priyatosh Jana,
ES: Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
FR: None
Apologies: Judith Hellerstein, Christopher Wilkinson, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Bill Jouris, Vanda Scartezini, Holly Raiche, Yrjö Länsipuro, Sarah Kiden, Anne-Marie Joly-Bachollet, Alfredo Calderon
Observer: Herb Waye
Staff: Heidi Ullrich, Claudia Ruiz, Marika Konings, Yeşim Sağlam
ES Interpreters: Marina & David
FR Interpreters: Camila & Claire
Call Management: Yeşim Sağlam
AGENDA
Click tabs for languages - Haga clic en pestañas para idiomas - Cliquez sur les onglets pour les langues
English (EN)
1. Welcome and Introduction to the Meeting - Staff (2 minutes)
2. Adoption of Agenda, Review of Action Items - Olivier Crépin-Leblond (3 minutes)
3. Update on ALAC Response to GNSO Small Group DNS Abuse Questions - Alan Greenberg and Justine Chew (5 mins)
4. Discussion on "UA Day" Plans - Satish Babu, ALAC Liaison to the UASG and APRALO Chair (10 mins)
5. Overview of Closed Generics and Discussion - Jonathan Zuck and TBD (15 minutes)
See: A Proposal for Public Interest Closed Generic gTLDs (PICG TLDs)
See: At-Large Policy Session on "Closed Generics" at ICANN73
6. Workgroup and Small Team Updates ( 20 minutes)
At-Large Workspace: Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (PDP) & GNSO Workspace: Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (PDP) (5 minutes)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Steinar Grøtterød and Daniel Nanghaka
ALAC Alternates: Raymond Mamattah and Lutz Donnerhacke
ALAC Observers: Chokri Ben Romdhane, Hans Bathija, K Mohan Raidu, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
See: Losing FOA Working Document, Auth-Info Codes Working Document and Additional Security Measures
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Yrjö Lansipuro and Justine Chew
ALAC Alternates: Vanda Scartezini and Carlos Raul Gutierrez
ALAC Observers: N/A
At-Large Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) & GNSO Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) (5 minutes)
At-Large Representatives - 5 mins
ALAC Members: Satish Babu, Lianna Galstyan and Abdulkarim Oloyede
ALAC Participants: Justine Chew and Hadia Elminiawi
No update
At-Large Workspace: Registration Data Accuracy (RDA) Scoping Team & GNSO Workspace: Registration Data Accuracy (RDA) Scoping Team (5 minutes)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Member: Alan Greenberg
No Update
System for Standardized Access/Disclosure (SSAD) & Operational Design Assessment (ODA) (5 mins)
At-Large Representative: Alan Greenberg
See: ODA Preliminary Report GNSO Council
7. Policy comment updates - Jonathan Zuck, Claudia Ruiz, drafting team member(s) and all (5 minutes)
Upcoming Public Comment Proceedings
Root Zone Update Process Study CPWG
The March 2016 proposal to transition the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) functions from the U.S. Department of Commerce to the global multistakeholder community called for a study to investigate the robustness of the operational arrangements for making changes to the root zone content to reduce or eliminate single points of failure. ICANN org commissioned this study, which is now ready for public review.
Policy Status Report: Uniform Dispute Resolution Procedure Policy (UDRP) CPWG
This Public Comment proceeding seeks input on the UDRP Policy Status Report. ICANN org will update the report to include relevant information from Public Comments.
Root Zone Label Generation Rules Version 5 (RZ-LGR-5) CPWG
To determine valid top-level Internationalized Domain Name (IDN) labels and their variant labels, the script communities have finalized their Label Generation Rules (LGR) for the root zone as per the LGR Procedure. These proposals are integrated into the Root Zone LGR (RZ-LGR) by the Integration Panel into its fifth version. RZ-LGR-5 is aiming to cover 26 scripts concluding work of active Generation Panels. ICANN is seeking input on it from the community.
NCAP Study 2 Draft Report CPWG
This Public Comment proceeding is to seek input on the Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) Study 2 draft report. The NCAP Discussion Group will consider the results of the Public Comment and produce a final report. (No Statement)
Initial Report on the Transfer Policy Review CPWG
This Public Comment proceeding seeks input on the working group's proposed recommendations amending the current Transfer Policy (https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/registrars/transfers-en).
NomComRIWG Proposed Changes to Bylaws and Standing Committee CharterOFB-WG
Four (4) recommendations from the Nominating Committee Review require amendments to the ICANN Bylaws. For efficiency, they are grouped together with the draft NomCom Standing Committee Charter, so that the ICANN community and the ICANN Board can follow a single process for the entire group. Note: NomComRIWG is the Nominating Commitee Review Implementation Working Group.
Updates to the GNSO Operating Procedures OFB-WG
Public Comment proceeding to reflect updates to the GNSO Working Group Self-Assessment requirements as well as possible updates to the GNSO Statement of Interest (SOI) procedures and requirements.
Draft IANA and PTI FY24 Operating Plan and Budgets OFB-WG
The Draft IANA and PTI FY24 Operating Plan and Budgets sets forth the focus of effort and organizational commitment for the designated fiscal year. The ICANN Bylaws and PTI Bylaws require the preparation and adoption of an Annual OP&B prior to the start of each fiscal year.
- N/A
Statement Name |
Deadline |
Status |
Assigned Working Group | Penholder(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
8. Any other business (AOB) - Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Jonathan Zuck and all (4 minutes)
9. Next Meeting - Olivier Crépin-Leblond and staff (1 minute)
- CPWG meetings are held weekly on Wednesdays, at rotating times of 13 & 19 UTC.
- Proposed Next Meeting: Wednesday, 13 April at 20:00 UTC
CPWG Resources
Español (ES)
1. Bienvenida e Introducción a la Reunión - Personal (2 minutos)
2. Adopción de la agenda, revisión de los puntos de acción - Olivier Crépin-Leblond (3 minutos)
3. Actualización y próximos pasos sobre la respuesta del ALAC a la carta del Consejo de la GNSO sobre el abuso del DNS - Jonathan Zuck y Alan Greenberg (30 minutos)
Ver: Preguntas sobre el uso indebido del DNS en equipos pequeños de la GNSO
google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z8JPTXIQHDBGveCIsw_gxQQG_4ZwC5KnLStNBSj66x0/edit
4. Actualizaciones de grupos de trabajo y equipos pequeños (20 minutos)
At-Large Workspace: Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (PDP) & GNSO Workspace: Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (PDP) (5 mins)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Steinar Grøtterød and Daniel Nanghaka
ALAC Alternates: Raymond Mamattah and Lutz Donnerhacke
ALAC Observers: Chokri Ben Romdhane, Hans Bathija, K Mohan Raidu, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
Ver: Documento de trabajo de pérdida de FOA, documento de trabajo de códigos de información de autenticación y medidas de seguridad adicionales
At-Large Workspace: EPDP Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs (ex Work Track) & GNSO Workspace: EPDP Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs (ex Work Track) (5 minutos)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Yrjö Lansipuro and Justine Chew
ALAC Alternates: Vanda Scartezini and Carlos Raul Gutierrez
ALAC Observers: N/A
At-Large Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) & GNSO Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) (0 minutos)
At-Large Representatives - Ninguna actualización
ALAC Members: Satish Babu, Lianna Galstyan and Abdulkarim Oloyede
ALAC Participants: Justine Chew and Hadia Elminiawi
Ninguna actualización
At-Large Registration Data Accuracy (RDA) Scoping Team Workspace & GNSO Registration Data Accuracy (RDA) Scoping Team Workspace (5 Minutos)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Member: Alan Greenberg
Ninguna actualización
5. Actualizaciones de comentarios sobre políticas: Jonathan Zuck, Claudia Ruiz, miembros del equipo de redacción y todos (5 minutos)
Upcoming Public Comment Proceedings
Proposal for Myanmar Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR) CPWG
The Myanmar script community has formed the Myanmar script Generation Panel (GP), which in turn has developed the Proposal for the Myanmar Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules. As per the LGR Procedure, this proposal is being posted for public comments to allow those who have not participated in the Myanmar script GP to make their views known to the GP. Based on the feedback, the Myanmar script GP will finalize the proposal for submission for integration into the Label Generation Rules for the Root Zone.
Updates to the GNSO Statement of Interest (SOI) Procedures and Requirements CPWG
Possible (still tentative at this time) Public Comment proceeding on experiences with and/or possible modifications to the GNSO Statement of Interest (SOI) procedures and requirements.
NCAP Study 2: Impact and Data Sensitivity Analysis CPWG
The Impact and Data Sensitivity Analysis is a part of the Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) Discussion Group's work to produce a Study 2 report. The NCAP Discussion Group will consider the results of the Public Comment proceeding as it develops its draft report, expected to be published for Public Comment in March 2022.
Supported Scripts for IDNs CPWG (TBC - At-Large IDNs mailing list)
The Unicode standard version 14.0.0 encoded 159 scripts. In Annex # 31, the standard categorizes these scripts as Excluded, Limited Use or Recommended for their use in defining identifiers. The Public Comment elicits feedback from the community on how this categorization should be applied to decide the scripts to use in the Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) at the second level and the top level of a domain name.
Comentarios Publicos para decision
Nombre del Comentario Público |
Comentarios del Público Cerrar |
Estado |
Grupo de Trabajo Asignado | Autor(es) |
---|---|---|---|---|
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
|
6. Cualquier otro negocio (AOB) - Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Jonathan Zuck y todos (4 minutos)
7. Próxima reunión: Olivier Crépin-Leblond y el personal (1 minuto)
Las reuniones del CPWG se llevan a cabo semanalmente los miércoles, en horarios rotativos de 13 y 19 UTC
Próxima reunión propuesta: miércoles 06 de Abril a las 13:00 UTC
.
CPWG Resources
Français (FR)
1. Mot de bienvenue et introduction à la réunion - Personnel (2 minutes)
2. Adoption de l'ordre du jour, examen des points d'action - Olivier Crépin-Leblond (3 minutes)
3. Mise à jour et prochaines étapes de la réponse de l'ALAC à la lettre du conseil de la GNSO sur l'abus du DNS - Jonathan Zuck et Alan Greenberg (30 minutes)
Voir : Lettre de la GNSO à l'ALAC
Voir : Questions sur l'utilisation abusive du DNS par une petite équipe de la GNSO
google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z8JPTXIQHDBGveCIsw_gxQQG_4ZwC5KnLStNBSj66x0/edit
4. Mises à jour des groupes de travail et des petites équipes (20 minutes)
At-Large Workspace: Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (PDP) & GNSO Workspace: Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (PDP) (5 Min)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Steinar Grøtterød and Daniel Nanghaka
ALAC Alternates: Raymond Mamattah and Lutz Donnerhacke
ALAC Observers: Chokri Ben Romdhane, Hans Bathija, K Mohan Raidu, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
Voir : Perte du document de travail FOA, document de travail des codes d'information d'authentification et mesures de sécurité supplémentaires
At-Large Workspace: EPDP Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs (ex Work Track) & GNSO Workspace: EPDP Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs (ex Work Track) (5 minutes)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Yrjö Lansipuro and Justine Chew
ALAC Alternates: Vanda Scartezini and Carlos Raul Gutierrez
ALAC Observers: N/A
At-Large Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) & GNSO Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) (0 minutes)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Satish Babu, Lianna Galstyan and Abdulkarim Oloyede
ALAC Participants: Justine Chew, Hadia Elminiawi
Pas de mise à jour
At-Large Registration Data Accuracy (RDA) Scoping Team Workspace & GNSO Registration Data Accuracy (RDA) Scoping Team Workspace (5 Minutes)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Member: Alan Greenberg
Pas de mise à jour
5. Mises à jour des commentaires sur la politique - Jonathan Zuck, Claudia Ruiz, membre(s) de l'équipe de rédaction et tous (5 minutes)
- TBD
Prochaines Procédures de Commentaires Publics
Proposal for Myanmar Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR) CPWG
The Myanmar script community has formed the Myanmar script Generation Panel (GP), which in turn has developed the Proposal for the Myanmar Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules. As per the LGR Procedure, this proposal is being posted for public comments to allow those who have not participated in the Myanmar script GP to make their views known to the GP. Based on the feedback, the Myanmar script GP will finalize the proposal for submission for integration into the Label Generation Rules for the Root Zone.
Updates to the GNSO Statement of Interest (SOI) Procedures and Requirements CPWG
Possible (still tentative at this time) Public Comment proceeding on experiences with and/or possible modifications to the GNSO Statement of Interest (SOI) procedures and requirements.
NCAP Study 2: Impact and Data Sensitivity Analysis CPWG
The Impact and Data Sensitivity Analysis is a part of the Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) Discussion Group's work to produce a Study 2 report. The NCAP Discussion Group will consider the results of the Public Comment proceeding as it develops its draft report, expected to be published for Public Comment in March 2022.
Supported Scripts for IDNs CPWG (TBC - At-Large IDNs mailing list)
The Unicode standard version 14.0.0 encoded 159 scripts. In Annex # 31, the standard categorizes these scripts as Excluded, Limited Use or Recommended for their use in defining identifiers. The Public Comment elicits feedback from the community on how this categorization should be applied to decide the scripts to use in the Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) at the second level and the top level of a domain name.
Commentaire public pour décision
Déclarations actuelles (avis, commentaires ou correspondance de l'ALAC)
Nom du commentaire public |
Commentaire public Fermer |
Statut |
Groupe de travail assigné | Auteur(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
|
6. Questions diverses (Divers) - Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Jonathan Zuck et tous (14 minutes)
a. Suggestions for policy topics for ICANN74 Plenary Sessions and At-Large Policy Sessions
7. Prochaine réunion - Olivier Crépin-Leblond et le personnel (1 minute)
- Les réunions du CPWG ont lieu chaque semaine le mercredi, à des heures tournantes de 13 et 19 UTC
- Prochaine réunion proposée : Mercredi 06 Avril à 13 h 00 UTC
1 Comment
Steinar Grøtterød
Summary of BC Transfer Policy Working Group Call
(Submitted to the GNSO TPR PDP on Apr. 5, 2022)
Post-Creation Lock
Ten days is too short. Leave it at 60 days if possible. Maybe 30 days is a happy medium, but 60 days is still preferable. The longer the better from a trademark enforcement perspective as it prevents having to redo a UDRP or demand letter, and also assists with preventing registrar hopping when a registrar is asked to take enforcement proceedings against an infringing or unlawfully used domain name.
There may be an issue in shortening the period from a registrar’s perspective, in that a registrar customer may take advantage of promotional / loss-leader type pricing for the initial year and then the customer moves away to another registrar.
Change of Registrant Lock
The default rule should be a transfer lock following a change of registrant. However, a registrar should be required in a transparent manner, to enable a registrant, upon request to opt-out of the transfer lock or to reduce the transfer lock, rather then leave it to each registrar to decide whether they will generally permit opt-outs. Nevertheless, each registrar should retain discretion as to whether to permit a transfer even if the registrant has ostensibly opted out, for security reasons. A transfer lock should not prevent registrants and businesses from effecting bona fide transfers when necessary or desirable. There should be a fact-based rationale for the determination of the length of the default transfer lock, whether it is 60 or 30 days, for example. A BC member is looking to see whether Domain Abuse Activity Reporting data can provide any insight into the appropriate length for transfer locks.
Change of Registrar Lock
This lock does not appear to be of significant concern as it would usually coincide with a change of registrant lock. However, a registrant should not be prevented from transferring a domain name from one registrar to another, even after a recent registrar change, unless there is another type of lock at play.
Zak