Date: Wednesday, 06 October 2021
Time: 13:00 - 14:30 UTC (for the time in various time zones click here)
How can I participate in this meeting?
English Conference ID = 1638
Spanish Conference ID = 1738
French Conference ID = 1838
Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/765717566?pwd=UTJCdWRSZVdJNEhOYW02OVBqQVQ1Zz09
Passcode: #CPWG2345*
RTT Link: https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=ICANN
Action Items: EN
Recording: EN, ES
Zoom Recording: EN
Zoom Chat: EN
Transcript: EN, ES, FR
Dial out Participants:
EN: Bill Jouris, Abdulkarim Oloyede, Alan Greenberg, Amrita Choudhury, Augusto Ho, Avri Doria, Chokri Ben Romdhane, Christoper Wilkinson, Dave Kissoondoyal, Eduardo Diaz, Gerry George, Gopal Tadepalli, Gordon Chillcott, Greg Shatan, Hadia Elminiawi, Holly Raiche, John McCormac, Jonathan Zuck, José R. Lebrón, Judith Hellerstein, Lutz Donnerhacke, Priyatosh Jana, Raymond Mamattah, Roberto Gaetano, Vernatius Ezeama, Yrjö Lansipuro, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Satish Babu, Hanan Khatib, Daniel K. Nanghaka
ES: Lilian Ivette
Apologies: Steinar Grøtterød, Yrjö Lansipuro, Sébastien Bachollet, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Justine Chew, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy, Alberto Soto
Observer: Herb Waye
Staff: Heidi Ullrich, Devan Reed, Evin Erdoğdu,
Interpreters:
ES: Marina & Claudia
Call Management: Devan Reed
Note: No live FR interpretation available, but a translated FR transcript will be posted.
Remarque : Aucune interprétation FR en direct disponible, mais une transcription FR traduite sera publiée.
AGENDA
Click tabs for languages - Haga clic en pestañas para idiomas - Cliquez sur les onglets pour les langues
English (EN)
1. Welcome and intro - staff (2 minutes)
2. Adoption of agenda, review of Action Items from 29 September - Olivier Crépin-Leblond (3 minutes)
3. Presentation on Proposal for Latin Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules - Bill Jouris (15 minutes)
4. Workgroup updates
At-Large Workspace: Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (PDP) & GNSO Workspace: Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (PDP) (10 minutes)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Steinar Grøtterød (apology) and Daniel Nanghaka
ALAC Alternates: Raymond Mamattah and Lutz Donnerhacke
ALAC Observers: Chokri Ben Romdhane, Hans Bathija, K Mohan Raidu, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Yrjö Lansipuro and Carlos Raul Gutierrez
ALAC Alternates: Justine Chew and Vanda Scartezini
ALAC Observers: N/A
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Hadia Elminiawi and Alan Greenberg
ALAC Alternate: Holly Raiche
ALAC Observers: Bastiaan Goslings, Kris Seeburn, Isaac Maposa, Eduardo Diaz, Gladys Maldonado, Yrjö Lansipuro, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy, Matthias Hudobnik, Alfredo Calderon, Abdeldjalil Bachar Bong, Antonio Medina Gómez, Ryan Finnesey, Jahangir Hossain, Oluwaseun Ajani
At-Large Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) & GNSO Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) (10 minutes)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Satish Babu, Lianna Galstyan and Abdulkarim Oloyede
ALAC Participants: Justine Chew and Hadia Elminiawi
5. Policy comment updates - Jonathan Zuck, Evin Erdoğdu, drafting team member(s) and all (20 minutes)
- None
Upcoming Public Comment Proceedings
Domain Abuse Activity Reporting (DAAR) 2.0 CPWG
Domain Abuse Activity Reporting (DAAR) 2.0 is seeking public comments.
Proposal for Myanmar Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR) CPWG
The Myanmar script community has formed the Myanmar script Generation Panel (GP), which in turn has developed the Proposal for the Myanmar Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules. As per the LGR Procedure, this proposal is being posted for public comments to allow those who have not participated in the Myanmar script GP to make their views known to the GP. Based on the feedback, the Myanmar script GP will finalize the proposal for submission for integration into the Label Generation Rules for the Root Zone.
ICANN Draft FY23-27 Operating and Financial Plan and Draft FY23 Operating Plan and Budget OFB-WG
The purpose of this Public Comment is to seek community input on ICANN's Draft FY23-27 Operating and Financial Plan and Draft FY23 Operating Plan and Budget.
Statement Name |
Deadline |
Status |
Assigned Working Group | Penholder(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Initial Report from the EPDP on Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs |
|
COMMENT |
CPWG |
Drafting team member(s): |
TBD Public Comment to open in October 2021 |
DRAFTING |
CPWG |
Drafting team member(s): |
6. Any other business (AOB) - Olivier Crépin-Leblond and all (3 minutes)
- Intervention re: Facebook - Christopher Wilkinson
7. Next Meeting - Olivier Crépin-Leblond and staff (2 minutes)
- CPWG meetings are held weekly on Wednesdays, at rotating times of 13 & 19 UTC.
CPWG Resources
Español (ES)
1. Bienvenida y asistencia - staff (2 minutos)
2. Adopcion de la Agenda, revision de los Acciones a partir del 29 de septiembre - Olivier Crépin-Leblond (3 minutos)
3. Presentación de la propuesta para las reglas de generación de etiquetas de la zona raíz del script latino - Bill Jouris (15 minutos)
4. Actualizaciones del grupo de trabajo:
At-Large Workspace: Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (PDP) & GNSO Workspace: Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (PDP) (10 minutos)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Steinar Grøtterød and Daniel Nanghaka
ALAC Alternates: Raymond Mamattah and Lutz Donnerhacke
ALAC Observers: Chokri Ben Romdhane, Hans Bathija, K Mohan Raidu, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
Ver: Documento de trabajo de códigos de información de autenticación
At-Large Workspace: EPDP Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs (ex Work Track) & GNSO Workspace: EPDP Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs (ex Work Track) (10 minutos)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Yrjö Lansipuro and Carlos Raul Gutierrez
ALAC Alternates: Justine Chew and Vanda Scartezini
ALAC Observers: N/A
At-Large Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data & GNSO Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data (10 minutos)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Hadia Elminiawi and Alan Greenberg
ALAC Alternate: Holly Raiche
ALAC Observers: Bastiaan Goslings, Kris Seeburn, Isaac Maposa, Eduardo Diaz, Gladys Maldonado, Yrjö Lansipuro, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy, Matthias Hudobnik, Alfredo Calderon, Abdeldjalil Bachar Bong, Antonio Medina Gómez, Ryan Finnesey, Jahangir Hossain, Oluwaseun Ajani
At-Large Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) & GNSO Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) (10 minutos)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Satish Babu, Lianna Galstyan and Abdulkarim Oloyede
ALAC Participants: Justine Chew, Hadia Elminiawi, Gopal Tadepalli
6. Actualizaciones de comentarios sobre políticas - Jonathan Zuck, Evin Erdoğdu, miembro (s) del equipo de redacción y todos (20 minutos)
Recientemente Ratificados por el ALAC
- Ninguno
Próximos Procedimientos de Comentarios Públicos
Domain Abuse Activity Reporting (DAAR) 2.0 CPWG
Domain Abuse Activity Reporting (DAAR) 2.0 is seeking public comments.
Proposal for Myanmar Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR) CPWG
The Myanmar script community has formed the Myanmar script Generation Panel (GP), which in turn has developed the Proposal for the Myanmar Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules. As per the LGR Procedure, this proposal is being posted for public comments to allow those who have not participated in the Myanmar script GP to make their views known to the GP. Based on the feedback, the Myanmar script GP will finalize the proposal for submission for integration into the Label Generation Rules for the Root Zone.
ICANN Draft FY23-27 Operating and Financial Plan and Draft FY23 Operating Plan and Budget OFB-WG
The purpose of this Public Comment is to seek community input on ICANN's Draft FY23-27 Operating and Financial Plan and Draft FY23 Operating Plan and Budget.
Comentarios Publicos para decision
Proposal for Latin Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules CPWG
Proposal for Japanese Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules CPWG
Declaracion actual (Consejo del ALAC, Comentario o Correspondencia)
Nombre del Comentario Público |
Comentarios del Público Cerrar |
Estado |
Grupo de Trabajo Asignado | Autor(es) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Report from the EPDP on Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs |
|
REDACCIÓN |
CPWG |
|
TBD Public Comment to open in October 2021 |
REDACCIÓN |
CPWG |
Equipo de redacción voluntario(s): |
7. Otros temas (AOB) - Olivier Crépin-Leblond y todos (3 minutos)
8. Próxima reunion - Olivier Crépin-Leblond y staff (2 minutos)
- Las reuniones del CPWG se llevan a cabo semanalmente los miércoles, en horarios rotativos de 13 y 19 UTC.
CPWG Resources
Français (FR)
1. Accueil et appel nominal - personnel (2 minutes)
2. Adoption de l'ordre du jour, examen des points d'action à partir du 29 septembre - Olivier Crépin-Leblond (3 minutes)
3. Présentation sur la proposition de règles de génération d'étiquettes de zone racine en script latin - Bill Jouris (15 minutes)
4. Mises à jour du groupe de travail:
At-Large Workspace: Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (PDP) & GNSO Workspace: Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (PDP) (10 minutes)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Steinar Grøtterød and Daniel Nanghaka
ALAC Alternates: Raymond Mamattah and Lutz Donnerhacke
ALAC Observers: Chokri Ben Romdhane, Hans Bathija, K Mohan Raidu, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
At-Large Workspace: EPDP Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs (ex Work Track) & GNSO Workspace: EPDP Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs (ex Work Track) (10 minutes)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Yrjö Lansipuro and Carlos Raul Gutierrez
ALAC Alternates: Justine Chew and Vanda Scartezini
ALAC Observers: N/A
At-Large Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data & GNSO Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data (10 minutes)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Hadia Elminiawi and Alan Greenberg
ALAC Alternate: Holly Raiche
ALAC Observers: Bastiaan Goslings, Kris Seeburn, Isaac Maposa, Eduardo Diaz, Gladys Maldonado, Yrjö Lansipuro, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy, Matthias Hudobnik, Alfredo Calderon, Abdeldjalil Bachar Bong, Antonio Medina Gómez, Ryan Finnesey, Jahangir Hossain, Oluwaseun Ajani
At-Large Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) & GNSO Workspace: Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) (10 minutes)
At-Large Representatives
ALAC Members: Satish Babu, Lianna Galstyan and Abdulkarim Oloyede
ALAC Participants: Justine Chew, Hadia Elminiawi, Gopal Tadepalli
6. Mises à jour des commentaires sur la politique - Jonathan Zuck, Evin Erdoğdu, membre (s) de l'équipe de rédaction et tous (10 minutes)
- Non
Prochaines Procédures de Commentaires Publics
Domain Abuse Activity Reporting (DAAR) 2.0 CPWG
Domain Abuse Activity Reporting (DAAR) 2.0 is seeking public comments.
Proposal for Myanmar Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR) CPWG
The Myanmar script community has formed the Myanmar script Generation Panel (GP), which in turn has developed the Proposal for the Myanmar Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules. As per the LGR Procedure, this proposal is being posted for public comments to allow those who have not participated in the Myanmar script GP to make their views known to the GP. Based on the feedback, the Myanmar script GP will finalize the proposal for submission for integration into the Label Generation Rules for the Root Zone.
ICANN Draft FY23-27 Operating and Financial Plan and Draft FY23 Operating Plan and Budget OFB-WG
The purpose of this Public Comment is to seek community input on ICANN's Draft FY23-27 Operating and Financial Plan and Draft FY23 Operating Plan and Budget.
Commentaire public pour décision
Proposal for Latin Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules CPWG
Proposal for Japanese Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules CPWG
Déclarations actuelles (avis, commentaires ou correspondance de l'ALAC)
Nom du commentaire public |
Commentaire public Fermer |
Statut |
Groupe de travail assigné | Auteur(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Report from the EPDP on Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs |
|
RÉDACTION |
CPWG |
|
TBD Public Comment to open in October 2021 |
RÉDACTION |
CPWG |
Membre(s) de l'équipe de rédaction: |
7. Toute autre affaire (AOB) - Olivier Crépin-Leblond et tous (3 minutes)
8. Prochaine réunion - Olivier Crépin-Leblond et le personnel (2 minutes)
- Les réunions du CPWG ont lieu chaque semaine le mercredi, à des heures de rotation de 13 et 19 UTC.
2 Comments
Gopal Tadepalli
Thank you Mr. Bill Jouris for a lucid presentation on Latin Script and the PPT.
As you are aware, the internationalized domain name (IDN) homograph attack is used to form domain names that visually resemble legitimate domain names, albeit, using a different set of characters. The prevention is based on Registration and Access.
On the server-side, ICANN issued several policies over the past few years to limit the efficacy of IDN homograph attacks in ccTLD registry operators.
Are the choices of Latin script generators due to this constraint as well ?
Observation:
Unicode “confusables” make up a significant percentage of the characters found in IDNs. Some research reports indicate close to 90%. A “confusable” is a Unicode code point that is often easily confused with other characters, ligatures (join for two or more letters to form a single glyph), and/or digraphs (two letters that make a single sound).
My earlier experience:
Very limited work on mappings for Tamil Scripts with due regards to the Tamil Alphabet in Tamizh that was transliterated for the preliminary work. This was way back in 1988-89. There were bottlenecks in the formal mapping to the QWERTY Keyboard and UNICODE.
/* EDIT DATED 11 MARCH 2022 */
The QWERTY layout was borrowed from the typewriters and the design was to ensure the prevention of jamming.
It is understandable that there were FOUR variants of the layout for English. TWENTY THREE other languages have variant layouts. The Windows Operating System is the most known Operating System driven layout variant. Very easily at least 10 variants to support multilingualism can also be traced. Layout design for the Keyboard and the native language is a good challenge.
In the passing, I wish to mention that the mouse operates on the primitives called "click and drag" that also have medical implications unlike the ten fingure based operation of a keyboard.
Thank you again.
Dr. Gopal T V
Gopal Tadepalli
(Internationationalized) Domain Names: Specifically on "Registration and Access":
“Control over the ‘top-level’ domains such as .com and .edu indirectly gives control over all domain names, and so is something of great power. Who should exercise that power? … One problem is that the better domain names will wind up with the people or companies that have the most money, crippling fairness and threatening universality.”
............................
“technical decision to make [DNS] a single point of reliance can be exploited politically for power and commercially for profit.”
.edu domains are highly vulnerable. Thankfully, in my humble opinion, only the "consolidation risks" may need to thought of for "Registration".
In the passing, I wish to mention that the usage of the term "handle" has been in vogue for nearly 200 years to mean title or pseudonym or nickname. Devices and Technology to work with the "handles" on the internet affect the experiences, uses, and identities.
I am sorry, I will not be attending the CPWG meeting on 13 October 2021 as I am traveling by road. I eagerly await the Official Communique.
Dr. T V Gopal
PS: I wonder if the distinction among the terms Domain, Website and URL is so sharp as it used to be earlier due to plenty of advances in devices, technologies and algorithms. Also, any day the shorter "domain names" have a higher degree of usability over the longer ones but they are all taken very soon due the less number of possible combinations of the number of characters. There are work arounds for this.