AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
Page History
...
Action Items: EN
Recording: EN, ES, FR
Zoom Recording: EN
Zoom Chat: EN EN
...
Dial out Participants:
EN: Olivier Crépin-Leblond,
ES:
FR:
Apologies:
Hadia Elminiawi, Sivasubramanian Muthasamy, Alan Greenberg, Alfredo Calderon, Allan Magezi, Avri Dori, Sebastien Bachollet, Bill Jouris, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Claire Craig, Christopher Wilkinson, Daniel Nanghaka, Ejikeme Egbuogu, Gopal Tadepali, Gordon Chillcott, Greg Shatan, Holly Raiche, Jeffrey Neuman, John McCormac, Jonathan Zuck, Laura Margolis, Laurin Benedikt Wissinger, Lilian Ivette Deluque, Lutz Donnerhacke, Lyndell St. Ville, Michael Palage, Pari Esfandiari, Roberto Gaetno, Vernatius Ezeama, Yrjo Lansipuro, Judith Hellerstein
ES: Harold Arcos
FR: Anne-Marie Joly-Bachollet
Apologies:Priyatosh Jana, Marita Moll, Justine Chew, Steinar Grøtterød, Lianna Galstyan, Maureen Hilyard, Satish Babu, Mouloud Khelif, Vanda Scartezini, Chokri Ben Romdane,
Observer: Herb WayeObserver:
Staff: Heidi Ullrich, Claudia Ruiz, Melissa Peters Allgood Michelle DeSmyter
ES Interpreters: Paula & Marina
FR Interpreters: Claire & Jacques
Call Management: TBD
...
Michelle DeSmyter
...
AGENDA
Click tabs for languages - Haga clic en pestañas para idiomas - Cliquez sur les onglets pour les langues
...
Deck of Cards | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
|
...
|
...
4. Discussion on "UA Day" Plans - Satish Babu, ALAC Liaison to the UASG and APRALO Chair (10 mins)
5. Overview of Closed Generics and Discussion - Jonathan Zuck and TBD (15 minutes)
See: A Proposal for Public Interest Closed Generic gTLDs (PICG TLDs)
See: At-Large Policy Session on "Closed Generics" at ICANN73
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
Root Zone Update Process Study CPWG
The March 2016 proposal to transition the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) functions from the U.S. Department of Commerce to the global multistakeholder community called for a study to investigate the robustness of the operational arrangements for making changes to the root zone content to reduce or eliminate single points of failure. ICANN org commissioned this study, which is now ready for public review.
...
|
...
|
...
Root Zone Label Generation Rules Version 5 (RZ-LGR-5) CPWG
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
1 COMMENT
Steinar Grøtterød
Summary of BC Transfer Policy Working Group Call
(Submitted to the GNSO TPR PDP on Apr. 5, 2022)
Post-Creation Lock
Ten days is too short. Leave it at 60 days if possible. Maybe 30 days is a happy medium, but 60 days is still preferable. The longer the better from a trademark enforcement perspective as it prevents having to redo a UDRP or demand letter, and also assists with preventing registrar hopping when a registrar is asked to take enforcement proceedings against an infringing or unlawfully used domain name.
There may be an issue in shortening the period from a registrar’s perspective, in that a registrar customer may take advantage of promotional / loss-leader type pricing for the initial year and then the customer moves away to another registrar.
Change of Registrant Lock
The default rule should be a transfer lock following a change of registrant. However, a registrar should be required in a transparent manner, to enable a registrant, upon request to opt-out of the transfer lock or to reduce the transfer lock, rather then leave it to each registrar to decide whether they will generally permit opt-outs. Nevertheless, each registrar should retain discretion as to whether to permit a transfer even if the registrant has ostensibly opted out, for security reasons. A transfer lock should not prevent registrants and businesses from effecting bona fide transfers when necessary or desirable. There should be a fact-based rationale for the determination of the length of the default transfer lock, whether it is 60 or 30 days, for example. A BC member is looking to see whether Domain Abuse Activity Reporting data can provide any insight into the appropriate length for transfer locks.
Change of Registrar Lock
This lock does not appear to be of significant concern as it would usually coincide with a change of registrant lock. However, a registrant should not be prevented from transferring a domain name from one registrar to another, even after a recent registrar change, unless there is another type of lock at play.
|
...