English (EN)

1. Welcome and intro - staff (2 minutes)

2. Adoption of agenda, review of Action Items from 29 July - Olivier Crepin-Leblond (3 minutes)

3. Workgroup Updates

• EPDP Phase II Update - Hadia Elminiawi and Alan Greenberg (20 minutes)
  

  View file
  name ALAC-Additional-Statement-v01.pdf height 250

  
  
• Subsequent Procedures ("SubPro") - SubPro Small Team (60 minutes)
  

Ongoing work by Small Team: Development of At-Large's Preliminary Scorecard on SubPro, inter alia for intersessional ALAC-GAC cooperation and At-Large participation in the GAC Focus Group on SubPro 

Schedule of Issues/Topics: Small Team Workplan

Consensus Building: 
(a) Geographic Names - WT5 Final Report - Marita Moll, Yrjö Länsipuro, Christopher Wilkinson, Justine Chew
(b) Objections - GAC Advice & GAC Early Warning only - Justine Chew
(c) Objections - Others - Justine Chew
(d) Limited Challenge/Appeal Mechanism - Justine Chew

4. Policy comment updates - Jonathan Zuck, Evin Erdoğdu, drafting team member(s) and all (10 minutes) 

Recently Ratified by the ALAC

Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model – Next Steps
The At-Large community is pleased to follow up on its prior ALAC statements regarding ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model (see: 13 June 2019, 14 October 2019, February 2020) with this ALAC statement on Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model - Next Steps. The ALAC made recommendations on priority issues, moving out of silos, restoring recruitment and demographics, reviewing previous responses, identifying gaps, pandemic related issues and evaluation of success with respect to the latest Public Comment on the topic.

Final Report of the Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) on new gTLD Auction Proceeds
The ALAC appointed five Members to the CCWG and these Members, alongside several participants from At-Large, were very active contributors to the work of the CCWG. The ALAC believes that all of its concerns have been addressed and therefore was pleased to accept and ratify the Final Report of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross Community Working Group.

Third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) Final Report
The ALAC strongly supports the limited and focused number of recommendations proposed by the ATRT3 report, reflecting the pending implementation of proposals from previous review teams. In moving forward, the ALAC advises the ICANN Board to: (1) Swiftly implement ATRT3 recommendation to evolve both specific and organizational reviews as per Section 8 of the final report; (2) Fully endorse the recommendation to enhance current methods of Prioritization and Rationalization of Activities, Policies, and Recommendations (as per Section 10 of the report); (3) Share the ATRT3 Review Team’s approach to the review process and methodology behind it, aiming to ensure that all elements contributing to achieving strategic objectives and their subcomponents are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-based (SMART) and that all reporting on these refers to well specified metrics, to be reviewed on a regular or timely basis (as per Section 9 of the report).

ALAC Statement on EPDP (July 2020)
A vast amount of work has been done, but the ALAC believes that if and when the SSAD is deployed, the probability of its meeting the goals needed by the communities whose efforts we support will be low. Therefore, in order for the ALAC to support the EPDP Final Report, the ALAC noted the following GNSO Council outcomes would be required: 

1. GNSO Council would agree that any Evolution Standing Committee recommendation on additional SSAD decision use-cases (that are in full accordance with the EPDP Policy Recommendation 9.3) will be treated as Implementation and not require further policy deliberations.
2. Legal vs Natural, Accuracy, WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System and Anonymized contact email will be fully addressed with full participation in all aspects of discussions by the ICANN Advisory Committees that wish to participate. If these issues are deemed to be policy, they must be addressed by a group empowered to make policy recommendations, led by a qualified, non-conflicted chair. The GAC, ALAC and SSAC must be involved in setting the mandate or charter of such groups. The target for completion of all work should be no later than April 2021.
3. The GNSO Council would agree that ratifying the Evolution Standing Committee recommendations will only require a GNSO Majority as currently called for in the GNSO Policy Manual.
4. The GNSO Council would acknowledge that deliberations during implementation setting of prices for the SSAD must involve the future potential users of the SSAD and not only look at cost recovery but the actual ability and willingness of SSAD users to pay the prices being set.

Public Comment for Decision 

None

Current Statements (ALAC Advice, Comment or Correspondence)

None

5. Any other business (AOB) - Olivier Crepin-Leblond and all (3 minutes)

6. Next Meeting - Olivier Crepin-Leblond and staff (2 minutes)

Resources

Subsequent Procedures Scorecards

1. Applicant Support Program, v7 settled 5 May 2020
2. Application Change Request, v1 settled 7 May 2020
3. Role of Application Comment, v1 settled 7 May 2020
4. String Similarity, v2 settled 7 May 2020
5. Universal Acceptance, v4 settled 27 May 2020
6. Internationalized Domain Names, v4 settled 28 May 2020
7. Security and Stability, v2 settled 28 May 2020
8. Name Collision, v2 settled 28 May 2020 
9. Reserved Names, v2 draft, 8 Jun 2020
10. Community Applications, v4 draft, 10 Jun 2020
    1. At-Large Interventions on CBA and CPE, 11 Jun 2020
    2. Revised CPE Guidelines - A Proposal by At-Large, 11 Jun 2020 

Go to: SubPro Updates Workspace for other Updates to Issues/Topics under Deliberation by the SubPro PDP WG
For a progress report see: At-Large Scorecard Topic List, 10 June 2020

Español (ES)

1. Bienvenida y asistencia - staff (2 minutos)

2. Adopcion de la Agenda, revision de los Acciones a partir del 29 de julio - Olivier Crepin-Leblond (3 minutos)

3. Actualizaciones de grupo de trabajo

• Actualización de la Fase II del EPDP - Hadia Elminiawi y Alan Greenberg (20 minutos)
• Procedimientos posteriores ("SubPro") - SubPro Small Team (60 minutos)

Trabajo en curso del equipo pequeño ("Small Team"): desarrollo del cuadro de mando preliminar de At-Large en SubPro, entre otras cosas para la cooperación entre sesiones ALAC-GAC y la participación de At-Large en el Grupo de enfoque GAC sobre SubPro

Calendario de problemas / temas sujeto: Plan de trabajo de equipo pequeño

La creación de consenso: 
(a) Geographic Names - WT5 Final Report - Marita Moll, Yrjö Länsipuro, Christopher Wilkinson, Justine Chew
(b) Objections - GAC Advice & GAC Early Warning only - Justine Chew
(c) Objections - Others - Justine Chew
(d) Limited Challenge/Appeal Mechanism - Justine Chew

4. Actualizaciones de comentarios sobre políticas - Jonathan Zuck, Evin Erdoğdu, miembro (s) del equipo de redacción y todos (10 minutos)

Recientemente Ratificados por el ALAC 

Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model – Next Steps
The At-Large community is pleased to follow up on its prior ALAC statements regarding ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model (see: 13 June 2019, 14 October 2019, February 2020) with this ALAC statement on Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model - Next Steps. The ALAC made recommendations on priority issues, moving out of silos, restoring recruitment and demographics, reviewing previous responses, identifying gaps, pandemic related issues and evaluation of success with respect to the latest Public Comment on the topic.

Final Report of the Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) on new gTLD Auction Proceeds
The ALAC appointed five Members to the CCWG and these Members, alongside several participants from At-Large, were very active contributors to the work of the CCWG. The ALAC believes that all of its concerns have been addressed and therefore was pleased to accept and ratify the Final Report of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross Community Working Group.

Third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) Final Report
The ALAC strongly supports the limited and focused number of recommendations proposed by the ATRT3 report, reflecting the pending implementation of proposals from previous review teams. In moving forward, the ALAC advises the ICANN Board to: (1) Swiftly implement ATRT3 recommendation to evolve both specific and organizational reviews as per Section 8 of the final report; (2) Fully endorse the recommendation to enhance current methods of Prioritization and Rationalization of Activities, Policies, and Recommendations (as per Section 10 of the report); (3) Share the ATRT3 Review Team’s approach to the review process and methodology behind it, aiming to ensure that all elements contributing to achieving strategic objectives and their subcomponents are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-based (SMART) and that all reporting on these refers to well specified metrics, to be reviewed on a regular or timely basis (as per Section 9 of the report).

ALAC Statement on EPDP (July 2020)
A vast amount of work has been done, but the ALAC believes that if and when the SSAD is deployed, the probability of its meeting the goals needed by the communities whose efforts we support will be low. Therefore, in order for the ALAC to support the EPDP Final Report, the ALAC noted the following GNSO Council outcomes would be required: 

1. GNSO Council would agree that any Evolution Standing Committee recommendation on additional SSAD decision use-cases (that are in full accordance with the EPDP Policy Recommendation 9.3) will be treated as Implementation and not require further policy deliberations.
2. Legal vs Natural, Accuracy, WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System and Anonymized contact email will be fully addressed with full participation in all aspects of discussions by the ICANN Advisory Committees that wish to participate. If these issues are deemed to be policy, they must be addressed by a group empowered to make policy recommendations, led by a qualified, non-conflicted chair. The GAC, ALAC and SSAC must be involved in setting the mandate or charter of such groups. The target for completion of all work should be no later than April 2021.
3. The GNSO Council would agree that ratifying the Evolution Standing Committee recommendations will only require a GNSO Majority as currently called for in the GNSO Policy Manual.
4. The GNSO Council would acknowledge that deliberations during implementation setting of prices for the SSAD must involve the future potential users of the SSAD and not only look at cost recovery but the actual ability and willingness of SSAD users to pay the prices being set.

Comentarios Publicos para decision

Ninguno

Declaracion actual (Consejo del ALAC, Comentario o Correspondencia)

Ninguno

5. Otros temas (AOB) - Olivier Crepin-Leblond y todos (3 minutos)

6. Próxima reunion - Olivier Crepin-Leblond y staff (2 minutos) 

Resources

SubPro Cuadros de mando

1. Applicant Support Program, v7 settled 5 May 2020
2. Application Change Request, v1 settled 7 May 2020
3. Role of Application Comment, v1 settled 7 May 2020
4. String Similarity, v2 settled 7 May 2020
5. Universal Acceptance, v4 settled 27 May 2020
6. Internationalized Domain Names, v4 settled 28 May 2020
7. Security and Stability, v2 settled 28 May 2020
8. Name Collision, v2 settled 28 May 2020
9. Reserved Names, v2 draft, 8 Jun 2020
10. Community Applications, v4 draft, 10 Jun 2020
    1. At-Large Interventions on CBA and CPE, 11 Jun 2020
    2. Revised CPE Guidelines - A Proposal by At-Large, 11 Jun 2020   

Ver: SubPro Updates Workspace para actualizaciones de temas / temas bajo deliberación por los procedimientos posteriores PDP WG
Para ver un informe de progreso, consulte: Lista de temas del cuadro de mando de At-Large, 10 junio de 2020

Français (FR) 

1. Accueil et appel nominal - personnel (2 minutes)

2. Adoption de l'ordre du jour, examen des points d'action à partir du 29 juillet - Olivier Crepin-Leblond (3 minutes)

3. Mises à jour du groupe de travail

• Mise à jour EPDP Phase II - Hadia Elminiawi et Alan Greenberg (20 minutes)
• Procédures suivantes ("SubPro") - SubPro Small Team (60 minutes)

Travaux en cours par une petite équipe: élaboration du tableau de bord préliminaire d'At-Large sur SubPro, notamment pour la coopération intersessions ALAC-GAC et participation d'At-Large au groupe de discussion du GAC sur SubPro.

Calendrier des problèmes / sujets soumis: Plan de travail en petite équipe

Établissement d'un consensus: 
(a) Geographic Names - WT5 Final Report - Marita Moll, Yrjö Länsipuro, Christopher Wilkinson, Justine Chew
(b) Objections - GAC Advice & GAC Early Warning only - Justine Chew
(c) Objections - Others - Justine Chew
(d) Limited Challenge/Appeal Mechanism - Justine Chew

4. Mises à jour des commentaires sur la politique - Jonathan Zuck, Evin Erdoğdu, membre (s) de l'équipe de rédaction et tous (10 minutes)

Récemment ratifié par l'ALAC

Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model – Next Steps
The At-Large community is pleased to follow up on its prior ALAC statements regarding ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model (see: 13 June 2019, 14 October 2019, February 2020) with this ALAC statement on Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model - Next Steps. The ALAC made recommendations on priority issues, moving out of silos, restoring recruitment and demographics, reviewing previous responses, identifying gaps, pandemic related issues and evaluation of success with respect to the latest Public Comment on the topic.

Final Report of the Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) on new gTLD Auction Proceeds
The ALAC appointed five Members to the CCWG and these Members, alongside several participants from At-Large, were very active contributors to the work of the CCWG. The ALAC believes that all of its concerns have been addressed and therefore was pleased to accept and ratify the Final Report of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross Community Working Group.

Third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) Final Report
The ALAC strongly supports the limited and focused number of recommendations proposed by the ATRT3 report, reflecting the pending implementation of proposals from previous review teams. In moving forward, the ALAC advises the ICANN Board to: (1) Swiftly implement ATRT3 recommendation to evolve both specific and organizational reviews as per Section 8 of the final report; (2) Fully endorse the recommendation to enhance current methods of Prioritization and Rationalization of Activities, Policies, and Recommendations (as per Section 10 of the report); (3) Share the ATRT3 Review Team’s approach to the review process and methodology behind it, aiming to ensure that all elements contributing to achieving strategic objectives and their subcomponents are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-based (SMART) and that all reporting on these refers to well specified metrics, to be reviewed on a regular or timely basis (as per Section 9 of the report).

ALAC Statement on EPDP (July 2020)
A vast amount of work has been done, but the ALAC believes that if and when the SSAD is deployed, the probability of its meeting the goals needed by the communities whose efforts we support will be low. Therefore, in order for the ALAC to support the EPDP Final Report, the ALAC noted the following GNSO Council outcomes would be required: 

1. GNSO Council would agree that any Evolution Standing Committee recommendation on additional SSAD decision use-cases (that are in full accordance with the EPDP Policy Recommendation 9.3) will be treated as Implementation and not require further policy deliberations.
2. Legal vs Natural, Accuracy, WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System and Anonymized contact email will be fully addressed with full participation in all aspects of discussions by the ICANN Advisory Committees that wish to participate. If these issues are deemed to be policy, they must be addressed by a group empowered to make policy recommendations, led by a qualified, non-conflicted chair. The GAC, ALAC and SSAC must be involved in setting the mandate or charter of such groups. The target for completion of all work should be no later than April 2021.
3. The GNSO Council would agree that ratifying the Evolution Standing Committee recommendations will only require a GNSO Majority as currently called for in the GNSO Policy Manual.
4. The GNSO Council would acknowledge that deliberations during implementation setting of prices for the SSAD must involve the future potential users of the SSAD and not only look at cost recovery but the actual ability and willingness of SSAD users to pay the prices being set.