Page History

...

Document prepared by Working Group 2*(1alacworkinggroups]***

Comments responding to documents prepared by the PSC, and specifically concerning “Improving Institutional Confidence,” where organized in 5 areas:

...

First draft (in English) established by Sebastien Bachollet the 18th of February. Second draft (in English) established by Sebastien Bachollet the 23rd of February. Third draft (edition of the second) by Seth M. Reiss the 25th of February. Fourth draft by Seth M. Reiss the 3d of March. ---- alacworkinggroups:(1]Members of the group ALS Rep Carlos Aguirre – LACRALO Izumi Aizu – APRALO Louis Houle – NARALO Tommi Karttaavi – EURALO Glenn McKnight – NARALO Antonio Medina Gomez – LACRALO Sivasubramanian Muthusamy – APRALO Jose Ovidio Salgueiro – LACRALO Aislan Vargas – LACRALO Mathias Altamira – LACRALO Mamonia Niangl – AFRALO

...

Working Group 2 will prepare a statement encapsulating the views of the At-Large community on “the future structure and governance of ICANN”. This is a major current initiative of ICANN, referred to as the “Improving Institutional Confidence” process.
More than two years ago, the President’s Strategy Committee (PSC) commenced a series of consultations on how to strengthen and complete the ICANN multi-stakeholder model. In addition, the recent midterm review of the Joint Project Agreement (JPA) between the United States Department of Commerce and ICANN produced useful comments about ICANN’s performance and future.
More information about this process may be found at http://www.icann.org/en/jpa/iic/improving-confidence-revised.htm^{Image Removed}

Document prepared by Working Group 2alacworkinggroups:(1]**

Comments responding to documents prepared by the PSC, and specifically concerning “Improving Institutional Confidence,” where organized in 5 areas:

...

Meanwhile, WG2 has begun its work – prior to the Mexico ICANN meeting and our ALS Summit and also prior to the most recent revision of the PSC document “Improving Institutional Confidence in ICANN” due out before the Mexico meeting.
The new version http://www.icann.org/en/jpa/iic/draft-iic-implementation-26feb09-en.pdf^{Image Removed} was posted the 27 of February 2009.

...

If one party is able to have a decision or a group of decisions taken by this sole party, or if the entire organization ends up acting systematically to favor particular vested interests. Is the process of taking over control of an organization in full, or gaining partial control by way of gaining undue influence.

\[Capture is the undue and out-of-proportion pressure, influence or control of or co-optation by any one person, entity or group of interests over the processes or the results of ICANN decision making.

In other words, capture occurs when one entity, interest, or group of interests has undue or out-of-proportion pressure, influence or control over ICANN, or any structural subdivision of ICANN, or any decision or group of decisions made within ICANN.\[

There are different possible ways to capture ICANN, including
One way would be to capture the organization.
Another would be to capture the policy making process.

...

First draft (in English) established by Sebastien Bachollet the 18th of February at 9:30am UTC.
Second draft (in English) established by Sebastien Bachollet the 23rd of February at 22:10am UTC
Third draft (edition of the second) by Seth M. Reiss the 25th of February.

...

alacworkinggroups:(1]Members of the group

Carlos Aguirre - LACRALO / Izumi Aizu - APRALO / Vittorio Bertola - EURALO / Victor Ciza - AFRALO /

...

Working Group 2 will prepare a statement encapsulating the views of the At-Large community on the future structure and governance of ICANN. This is a major area of work in ICANN at the present, known as the “Improving Institutional Confidence” process.
More than two years ago, the President’s Strategy Committee (PSC) commenced a series of consultations on how to strengthen and complete the ICANN multi-stakeholder model. In addition, the recent midterm review of the Joint Project Agreement (JPA) between the United States Department of Commerce and ICANN produced useful comments about ICANN’s performance and future.
More information about this process may be found at http://www.icann.org/en/jpa/iic/improving-confidence-revised.htm^{Image Removed}

Document prepared by Working Group 2|1]|https://st.icann.org/static/3.1.2.8/skin/s3/html/wikiwyg.html#_ftn1]**

...

First draft established by Sebastien Bachollet the 18th of February at 9:30am UTC. Second draft established by Sebastien Bachollet the 23rdof February at 22:10am UTC.

...

alacworkinggroups:(1|https://st.icann.org/static/3.1.2.8/skin/s3/html/wikiwyg.html#_ftnref1]Members of the group

...

Working Group 2 will prepare a statement encapsulating the views of the At-Large community on the future structure and governance of ICANN. This is a major area of work in ICANN at the present, known as the “Improving Institutional Confidence” process.
More than two years ago, the President’s Strategy Committee (PSC) commenced a series of consultations on how to strengthen and complete the ICANN multi-stakeholder model. In addition, the recent midterm review of the Joint Project Agreement (JPA) between the United States Department of Commerce and ICANN produced useful comments about ICANN’s performance and future.
More information about this process may be found athttp://www.icann.org/en/jpa/iic/improving-confidence-revised.htm

h2. Document prepared by Working Group 2alacworkinggroups:(1|https://st.icann.org/static/3.1.2.8/skin/s3/html/wikiwyg.html#_ftn1]**

The comments around the documents prepared by the PSC and specifically “Improving Institutional Confidence” where organized in 5 areas:

...

First draft established by Sebastien Bachollet the 18th of February at 9:30am UTC.

...

alacworkinggroups:(1|https://st.icann.org/static/3.1.2.8/skin/s3/html/wikiwyg.html#_ftnref1]Members of the group

...