AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
Page History
...
Recently Ratified by the ALACEvolving ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model
Draft Financial Assumptions & Projections and Operating Initiatives for the development of Fiscal Years 2021-2025 Operating & Financial Plan
Executive Summary TBD
Proposed IANA SLAs for Publishing LGRs/IDN Tables
The ALAC contribution to the evolving multistakeholder model condensed the 21 issues developed through community consultations into 4 general categories: (1) structural, (2) process, (3) participation and (4) intergroup relations. Regarding structure and process, the ALAC recommends more specific scoping, the use of external influences and project management tools, easily retrievable records of discussions and decisions and joint community/staff priority setting. Regarding participation, the ALAC noted the mutlistakeholder system depends on wide participation in the process and wide participation from all regions remains a challenge, including language barriers and volunteer burnout. Finally regarding intergroup relations, the ALAC noted there will always be disagreements, but a culture of positive relations between and among groups must be actively encouraged.
Recently submitted (note: not ICANN public comment):
- Revisions to the ICANN Bylaws re SSAC and RSSAC Leadership
- Draft Financial Assumptions & Projections and Operating Initiatives for the development of Fiscal Years 2021-2025 Operating & Financial Plan
- Draft Final Report of The Second Country Code Names Supporting Organization Review (ccNSO2) Note: CPWG recommended No Statement to ALAC.
supports the recommendations of the CSC and PTI for the proposed IANA SLAs for publishing the LGRs/IDN Tables.
Fundamental Bylaws Amendment Proposal – IANA Naming Function Review
The ALAC supported the current version of the ICANN Bylaws Section 18.7(a) and 18.7(b), but understands that it has now proven to be difficult to implement. The ALAC agrees that the proposed change preserves the intent of the original Fundamental Bylaw and supports the change. Subject to any new information being brought to the ALAC’s attention, the current intention is that the ALAC will support this Fundamental Bylaw change when it is presented to the Empowered Community.
- None
Current Statements (ALAC Advice, Comment or Correspondence)
Public Comment Name | Public Comment Close | Status | Penholder(s) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evolving the Governance of the Root Server System | ||||||||||||||||||
|
| CPWG recommended No Statement to ALAC. | ||||||||||||||||
| Proposed IANA SLAs for Publishing LGRs/IDN Tables | 26 Jul |
| Yellow
| DRAFTING |
| |||||||||||||
| Proposed Definition of Name Collisions and Scope of Inquiry for the Name Collisions Analysis Project | Fundamental Bylaws Amendment Proposal – IANA Naming Function Review | 26 Jul |
| Alan Greenberg (TBC) Gregory Shatan (TBC) | Evolving the Governance of the Root Server System |
| ||||||||||||
Ongoing Workspace As per 17 July CPWG AI, this is an informal At-Large workspace on the topic. |
| Yellow
| DRAFTING | Proposed Definition of Name Collisions and Scope of Inquiry for the Name Collisions Analysis Project |
| |||||||||||||
| SAC105 Comment | TBD As per 24 July CPWG AI, this is an informal At-Large workspace on the topic. |
|
Education:
...
