Public Comment CloseStatement
Name 

Status

Assignee(s)

Call for
Comments Open
Call for
Comments
Close 
Vote OpenVote CloseDate of SubmissionStaff Contact and EmailStatement Number

26 July 2019

DRAFTING

Alan Greenberg and Gregory Shatan recommended the ALAC issue a statement on the topic. Penholder status TBC.


Hide the information below, please click here 

FINAL VERSION SUBMITTED (IF RATIFIED)

The final version to be submitted, if the draft is ratified, will be placed here by upon completion of the vote. 




FINAL DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC

The final draft version to be voted upon by the ALAC will be placed here before the vote is to begin.




DRAFT SUBMITTED FOR DISCUSSION

The first draft submitted will be placed here before the call for comments begins. The Draft should be preceded by the name of the person submitting the draft and the date/time. If, during the discussion, the draft is revised, the older version(S) should be left in place and the new version along with a header line identifying the drafter and date/time should be placed above the older version(s), separated by a Horizontal Rule (available + Insert More Content control).


1 Comment

  1. I would support the amendment.

    The current Bylaws was trying to ensure that the review not be done PURELY by ccNSO members, but included those (a shrinking number!) who do not choose to be affiliated with the ccNSO. Apparently implementation is not easy and I think the wording proposed will ensure openess without the constraints of having to get a volunteer who meets a variety of qualifications and willing to devote the time from a limited subset of ccTLDs.