AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
ALAC Liaisons and Representatives
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
Page History
...
- Elimination of reasonable due process (#6.2.5, 6.2.9)
- Reducing standards of proof to not require "clear and convincing evidence" (#6.2.6)
- Elimination of a requirement of bad faith when determining URS action (#6.2.7)
- A "loser pays" regime (#6.2.8)
- Requirement of a separate rationale for filing of appeal (#6.2.10.1)
- Extend URS beyond exact matches (#6.2.13)Lowering standards of proof in
We also note specifically that the Post Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedures (Scorecard #6.3) was not the product of the STI community consensus, but a disgraced remnant of the IRT effort that was demonstrated to act counter to the public interest and against overall Internet domain stability. We strongly oppose the re-introduction of the PDDRP and ask the GAC to re-evaluate its consideration of the public good in this matter.
In regard to Consumer Protection measures as stated in Scorecard #6.4 (except for #6.4.4, see below), ALAC strongly agrees with the GAC positions (though we also agree with the "due care" response from the Board related to #6.4.2). At-Large has long indicated to ICANN a dissatisfaction with enforcement efforts, and re-enforces the sentiments behind #4.2.3.
...