00:13:40    Maureen Hilyard:    Replying to "Whew, @Cheryl Langdo..."

I can definitely agree.JZ. Cheryl is a real trooper that she does these times so regularly
00:14:37    Natalia Filina:    Reacted to "I can stay for 30 mi..." with 
00:16:24    Sébastien Bachollet:    And cross ralo session
00:23:31    Jonathan Zuck:    Feels like we have plenty of proposals, so we should narrow them down as our next task.
00:23:48    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Reacted to "Feels like we have p..." with 
00:25:49    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Lots of advantages in being as consistent as possible with break times across the days (in terms of alternative day set up options). IMO
00:27:08    gisella.gruber:    Draft: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Sm9JAem59g7eEq3FCUXkirBd7rWk9F3WY4p4Auhtacg/edit#gid=0
00:27:21    Joanna Kulesza:    Reacted to "Draft: https://docs...." with 
00:27:55    Hadia Elminiawi:    ICANN and Technological Advancements: Ensuring that the management of unique identifiers remains efficient and effective.
 
The internet landscape is constantly evolving with new technologies and protocols emerging. How is ICANN and stakeholders adaptting to these changes and assuring that the management of unique identifiers remains efficient and effective.
 
The aim if the session is to:
 Identify emerging technologies that influence the Internet unique identifiers.
Discuss how the ICANN and the multistakeholder model are adapting and using new technology in managing the Internet unique identifiers.
00:27:56    gisella.gruber:    Note - Marita’s session has *not* been listed on the page I created. Neither have Deb’s
00:28:06    Hadia Elminiawi:    The above is a poropsal as well
00:28:22    gisella.gruber:    @Hadia Elminiawi - I am adding to the list
00:28:40    Hadia Elminiawi:    Reacted to "Draft: https://doc..." with 
00:28:55    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Agreed JZ avoid the 120 length as single style session
00:29:04    Hadia Elminiawi:    Reacted to "The above is a por..." with 
00:30:18    Lilian Deluque:    Sorry for to be late i was confuse with the time
00:30:35    Eduardo Díaz:    What is SDG?
00:30:56    Judith Hellerstein:    Replying to "What is SDG?"
Sustainable development goals
00:30:59    Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org:    Sustainable Development Goals
00:31:03    Sébastien Bachollet:    SDG Sustenaible Developemnt Goàals
00:31:24    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Attention to static style presentation (listening to presenter(s) mode) often starts to drop off after 45 mins people
00:31:38    Eduardo Díaz:    So what are Sustainable Development Goals?
00:32:37    Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org:    The 17 UN goals for countries to work toward related to development: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
00:32:57    Judith Hellerstein:    Yes@jonathan that was my question as well
00:33:18    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Link to DNS or Internet more generally  link to which SDGs needs to be *very* clear
00:33:44    Jonathan Zuck:    Here's an easier link to the At-Large schedule: https://atlarge.news/78Schedule
00:34:41    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    I think tailoring is essential
00:35:13    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Otherwise it's just another IG space briefing
00:35:31    Judith Hellerstein:    +1 Cheryl
00:36:10    Eduardo Díaz:    @Heidi: Thanks for the link. It is hard for me to see how this relates to ICANN other than that ICANN uses computers to run the organization and other things.
00:37:21    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Perhaps a shorter internal briefing for ourselves in these linkages (and they do exist) with SDGs is more appropriate at this stage
00:40:38    Lilian Deluque:    Reacted to "Otherwise it's just ..." with 
00:42:21    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    I would hope so JZ if this is to develop tools for CB that's worthy. But is it a F2F at AGM required activity
00:42:52    Eduardo Díaz:    We should schedule a one-hour session to discuss the document Johnathan recently prepared. This document proposes a new framework called the 'At-Large Loop'. Our discussion will be about understanding and evaluating this proposed framework.
00:43:08    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Reacted to "We should schedule a..." with ☑️
00:43:13    Maureen Hilyard:    Great discussion. Sorry I have to leave now.
00:43:26    Hadia Elminiawi:    Reacted to "We should schedule..." with 
00:44:36    Eduardo Díaz:    ok
00:44:42    Eduardo Díaz:    Thanks for the clarification
00:45:11    Hadia Elminiawi:    Maybe we could merge one or more together if possible
00:45:37    Joanna Kulesza:    https://www.cigionline.org/publications/interplanetary-internet-governance/
00:46:59    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    She has also recently presented on this matter to the Interplanetary SIG
00:47:37    gisella.gruber:    Natalia - email well received and added to the page: https://community.icann.org/x/UIBEDw
00:47:51    Natalia Filina:    Replying to "Natalia - email well..."

thanks Gisella!
00:48:38    Lilian Deluque:    Reacted to "We should schedule a..." with 
00:49:14    Hadia Elminiawi:    Reacted to "Maybe we could mer..." with 
00:49:28    Hadia Elminiawi:    Reacted to "Natalia - email we..." with 
00:50:41    Joanna Kulesza:    https://spacenews.com/op-ed-the-space-race-may-already-be-won/
00:50:42    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Also the MSG  experience should IMO. influence  satellite and indeed Interplanetary internet governance
00:51:07    Joanna Kulesza:    +1 CLO, that's why I feel we might wish to show our interest in the theme
00:52:36    Joanna Kulesza:    From Laura's report, for context "Another open governance question is whether the institutional complex overseeing the allocation and assignment of unique identifiers on Earth (i.e., ICANN, IANA, RIR, and so forth) will extend into space. This is a consequential question because it relates to the issue of whether there will be interoperability between the classical internet and solar-system networks. Already, there is an effort of completely distinct institutional jurisdiction materializing for space numbers."
00:54:01    Jonathan Zuck:    feedback from whom?
00:54:34    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Well Joanna you might guess I think the ICANN MSM is exactly why this can be specific in scope for ICANN that we can get engaged in (should we decide to) after proper briefing and discussion
00:55:13    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Specifically the RIR model msy be of great use
00:55:26    Joanna Kulesza:    <3
00:55:34    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Yeah bit obvious JZ
00:56:13    Joanna Kulesza:    Indeed, the European angle is interesting from the end user access perspective hence the proposal.
00:56:31    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Very much so Joanna
00:56:33    Joanna Kulesza:    Local (German) presence is a given. 
00:57:06    Joanna Kulesza:    Reacted to "Very much so Joanna" with 
00:57:25    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Your right Hadia there is a nexus here between the two topics
00:57:35    Joanna Kulesza:    Reacted to "Specifically the RIR..." with 
01:00:06    Joanna Kulesza:    Any (recent) background documents or scoping questions for this one Hadia?
01:00:17    Natalia Filina:    +1 Eduardo
01:00:22    Hadia Elminiawi:    @Eduardo Díaz good ideas
01:00:30    Natalia Filina:    Reacted to "@Eduardo Díaz good i..." with 
01:01:24    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Also several proposals are being fleshed out still
01:03:45    Joanna Kulesza:    +1 on this one Marita, glad to support you on this with the GAC. One note though: would be great to have some fellows/NextGeners join us there (taking in the feedback from Cancun).
01:04:03    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Reacted to "+1 on this one Marit..." with ☑️
01:04:22    Jonathan Zuck:    we can add it to our agenda with the GAC, in any case
01:04:45    Joanna Kulesza:    Reacted to "we can add it to our..." with 
01:04:49    Lilian Deluque:    Replying to "+1 on this one Marit..."

agree Joanna and marita
01:04:58    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    I like the idea of the follow on from Cancun's conversation
01:05:07    Marita Moll:    I think it should be a smaller panel -- for 60 mon
01:05:17    Joanna Kulesza:    @Gisella, do we have any confirmation on the GAC bilateral date/duration?
01:05:19    Marita Moll:    min
01:05:35    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Agreed Marita
01:06:54    gisella.gruber:    Replying to "@Gisella, do we have..."

60 minutes
01:07:12    gisella.gruber:    Replying to "@Gisella, do we have..."

Tuesday 11:30-12:30 but *not yet* set in stone
01:07:21    Joanna Kulesza:    Reacted to "Tuesday 11:30-12:30 ..." with 
01:07:37    Joanna Kulesza:    Replying to "@Gisella, do we have..."

thank you!
01:07:56    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    ++to bringing in RIRs
01:08:12    Natalia Filina:    Reacted to "++to bringing in RIR..." with 
01:09:09    Natalia Filina:    exactly Joanna, thank you, need to check!
01:09:10    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Indeed JK
01:10:14    Joanna Kulesza:    Indeed, Seb, there is slow progress on the DNS4EU, which might not be a bad thing all together.
01:10:31    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Reacted to "Indeed, Seb, there i..." with 
01:11:14    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    There will be a community webinar pre ICANN78
01:11:25    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    On Holistic Review
01:11:36    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    ToR
01:12:25    Sébastien Bachollet:    Thanks Cheryl and maybe a good time to have a discussion among At-Large?
01:12:39    Joanna Kulesza:    Glad to see this as a EURALO session or redraft to fit a more general agenda (I am certain Laura can be convinced to drop by).
01:12:55    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Bye for now then I look forward to the ranking survey with more detail in writing for some  proposals...
01:13:01    Joanna Kulesza:    Thank all!
01:13:06    Joanna Kulesza:    *Thanks all!
01:13:08    gisella.gruber:    I will send a note to the PC for all to submit their session descriptions and we can then launch a poll
01:13:09    Natalia Filina:    thanks all!

  • No labels