Zoom chat: 2019-12-04 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call

11:42:27 From Claudia Ruiz : Welcome to the Consolidated Policy Working Group Call
11:48:33 From Evin Erdoğdu : Hello all, welcome.
11:57:54 From Vanda Scartezini : hi everyone
12:05:11 From Chokri ben romdhane : please my name is Chokri Ben Romdhane
12:06:37 From Chokri ben romdhane : would you please correct last name with d
12:06:44 From Alan Greenberg (ALAC) : I sent my apologies??
12:06:49 From Claudia Ruiz : Alan is on the call
12:07:14 From Alan Greenberg (ALAC) : I did say I could not attend an earlier call today, but not this one.
12:07:32 From Alan Greenberg (ALAC) : But delighted to have Hadia handle this.
12:07:59 From Claudia Ruiz : Hadia has not joined the call yet
12:09:19 From Jonathan Zuck : yes
12:09:20 From Claudia Ruiz : @ Chokri Ben Romdhane - your name has been corrected.
12:09:51 From Hadia : hello all
12:09:58 From Jonathan Zuck : yes
12:10:28 From Chokri ben romdhane : @claudia thank you
12:10:52 From Evin Erdoğdu : Thank you @Jonathan
12:11:57 From Sonigitu Ekpe : Hello All.
12:12:22 From Holly Raiche : Maybe this is AOB - but what happens now with our comments on the PDP3. It was only GNSO seeking input - which we gave? So do they want to talk with ALAC about what we said?
12:14:32 From Vrikson Acosta : Hello everyone
12:15:49 From Maureen Hilyard (ALAC) : Sorry Im late.
12:18:44 From Chokri ben romdhane : any decisions about who will manage the central entity that will manage the registry data?
12:19:21 From Chokri ben romdhane : please olvier could ask this question to hadia
12:19:21 From Hadia : very courageous Alan
12:21:46 From Hadia : the determination with regard to the release of the data if you receive a valid request
12:22:25 From Chokri ben romdhane : : )
12:23:15 From Jonathan Zuck : Sigh. Milton
12:24:07 From Chokri ben romdhane : thank you hadia and alan congrats for the great job
12:26:03 From Hadia : thank you Chokri
12:29:00 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : please display the letter staff
12:29:25 From Holly Raiche : How many pages is that?
12:29:36 From Jonathan Zuck : Whole thing!
12:29:46 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : the letter is a 1 pager
12:29:57 From Holly Raiche : I think the term is tome rather than report
12:30:41 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : the Final Report is yet to be completed so unable to answer yet BUT the Interim was wall over 200 pages with 100+ specicifc questions
12:30:58 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : SO LOTS longer than that if the complete Doc is required
12:31:06 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Thx staff
12:32:16 From Claudia Ruiz : https://gac.icann.org/contentMigrated/gac-input-on-scope-of-upcoming-new-gtlds-subsequent-procedures-pdp-wg-public-comment
12:34:01 From Vanda Scartezini : lots of noise
12:34:02 From Hadia : there is sound on the line
12:34:17 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : line needs muting
12:34:17 From Justine Chew : @CW, yes, I can re-circulate my email.
12:36:44 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : That is indeed the question @Alan
12:36:57 From Vanda Scartezini : agree with Adam, we should support and add some comments in such direction
12:37:43 From Jonathan Zuck : agree the responsible thing is the full report
12:37:47 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : A HUGE resource requirement for ANY one responding
12:39:30 From Hadia : there won't be an EPDP report so it is only Subsequent procedures - still a lot
12:41:39 From Holly Raiche : So we should write back to GAC saying yes, we support their request?
12:42:06 From Jonathan Zuck : Sounds like it Holly
12:42:48 From Alan Greenberg (ALAC) : Not sure who had raised the timing issue...
12:42:57 From Jonathan Zuck : I also believe that selecting the sections to which we respond will be easier with a full report
12:43:33 From Justine Chew : @Holly, I will defer to Yrjo on that but more important if for ALAC to relay its position on the issue (referencing the GAC letter) to SubPro PDP WG.
12:43:41 From Justine Chew : *is
12:44:04 From Holly Raiche : @ Jonathan - I was assuming that yes, we split the work up
12:44:42 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Just a reminder that the Final Report will be influenced by ALL PC input not just your work product
12:44:42 From Jonathan Zuck : Split it up, yes, but also be selective about those sections to which the ALAC responds. Improvements to digital archery probably don’t concern end users
12:45:04 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : I am hearing support for the GACs letter
12:45:20 From Jonathan Zuck : Support the GAC letter
12:45:49 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : you just need to make that clear when it is discussed again in the PDP as it is the PDPWG that will decide
12:45:51 From Justine Chew : @OCL, thank you for confirming my double negative.
12:46:06 From Holly Raiche : We should start working on splitting up the SubPro into workable chunks - maybe the next C
12:46:06 From Holly Raiche : P
12:46:14 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Note there is both views firmly held within the WG regular Members
12:46:27 From Holly Raiche : WG meeting?
12:46:58 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : SubPro PDP WG
12:47:48 From Holly Raiche : The sooner wedeln with who takes what bits, the more time everyone will have to do the work
12:47:56 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : we have already received the GAC Letter had some online interactions and will as stated by @Justine come back to the issue as we move towards drafting
12:47:59 From Hadia : @justine if so when do you expect the entire report to be out
12:48:03 From christopher wilkinson : Leaving the call for now. Will follow up on Justine’s mail. CW
12:48:26 From Jonathan Zuck : so CPWG believes whole report. We’ll confirm on ALAC ML
12:48:59 From Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond : @Hadia: Cheryl mentioned that there is not date set yet but not epected before the holiday period
12:49:09 From Justine Chew : @Yrjo, thank you, yes I think so too.
12:49:30 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Yes Yrjö
12:49:38 From Maureen Hilyard (ALAC) : Happy to do what the group wants me to do :)
12:50:08 From Holly Raiche : I”m not sure if my earlier suggestion came through but under AOB - where are we up to with the PDP3 issue?
12:50:23 From Vanda Scartezini : mostly opportunity to hear colleagues opinions
12:50:37 From Justine Chew : @Alan, that's why I'm seeking guidance on process.
12:51:29 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : with pleasure OCL
12:52:16 From Alan Greenberg (ALAC) : Chair/CoChair hats weigh a lot. Taking it off is always a relief.
12:52:38 From Justine Chew : audio issue
12:52:51 From Carlos Raul Gutierrez : MS EXPLORER browser????
12:52:52 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : perhaps a dial out?
12:52:57 From Hadia : peter it is very difficult to hear you
12:53:01 From Carlos Raul Gutierrez : does it still exist?
12:53:08 From Holly Raiche : REAL audio sound problem
12:53:14 From Carlos Raul Gutierrez : Bing!
12:53:36 From Holly Raiche : A musical echo
12:53:54 From Yrjo Lansipuro : Vibraphone
12:54:06 From Holly Raiche : Emphasis on the vibra
12:54:23 From Peter Koch : apologies, line issue, wait for the dial out
12:54:28 From Vanda Scartezini : impossible to understand..sorry not be able to hear him
12:54:35 From Carlos Raul Gutierrez : must be using explorer
12:54:50 From Peter Koch : yes, Olivier, fine with me
12:54:52 From Holly Raiche : Yes
12:55:03 From Roberto : @OCL: if GEMS music comes out like this, I would be upset!
12:55:05 From Vanda Scartezini : hope he can come later
12:55:28 From Alan Greenberg (ALAC) : Unrelated, but on the subject of musical instruments, next year is the 100th anniversary of the invention of the Theremin.
12:55:28 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : I can imagine @Roberto
12:55:35 From Jonathan Zuck : It’s like that autotune on the Cher dance album
12:57:13 From Maureen Hilyard (ALAC) : @Alan & Justine The CPWG is the formal conduit for advising the ALAC about Policy issues. I note there are only 6 ALAC members here. Better attendance by ALAC members would enable a vote on any decisions such as Justine raised especially if they were here to get the background on it as well.
12:58:11 From Evin Erdoğdu : Thank you, Zak!
12:58:11 From Roberto : FYI, wrt the ISOC sale of PIR, I am working on a contribution - hopefully later tonight (EU time)
13:03:31 From Hadia : ok looking forward to that
13:03:38 From Justine Chew : Thank you, @Hadia and @Alan
13:04:30 From Hadia : @Justine :)
13:06:25 From Hadia : @Alan I can work on it tomorrow morning (my time) -
13:06:49 From Chokri ben romdhane : thank you all and have a good night
13:07:25 From Sylvia Herlein Leite : sorry, but I have to go now
13:07:29 From Holly Raiche : Much better
13:07:47 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Excellent :-) thanks for your patience Peter
13:22:26 From Vanda Scartezini : thanks Peter!
13:26:51 From Sarah Kiden : Thank you, Peter!
13:30:04 From Hadia : thank you peter
13:30:09 From Holly Raiche : Really interesting - with some real implications?
13:31:45 From Alberto Soto : Thanks Peter"
13:32:00 From Peter Koch : thanks, pleasure!
13:32:40 From Justine Chew : Thank you, Peter. I need to collect my thoughts before being able to structure a question. Perhaps I'll follow up with you offline.
13:33:01 From Roberto : Am I the only one who sees the relation between DoH and the sale of PIR?
13:33:13 From Peter Koch : yes, please do (pk@denic.de)
13:33:31 From Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond : Thank you very much Peter!
13:34:27 From Justine Chew : Thank you, Peter.
13:35:15 From Hadia : I shall have to leave now thanks all - bye for now
13:35:54 From Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond : next call @13:00 UTC - all ok?
13:36:15 From Vanda Scartezini : ok
13:36:17 From Holly Raiche : @ Roberto - that is a fascinating thought -
13:36:21 From Alberto Soto : For now, yes OOCL
13:36:32 From Alberto Soto : OCL
13:36:58 From Vanda Scartezini : thank you Roberto
13:37:01 From Jose R. Lebron : Need to go. Thanks
13:37:05 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Bye for now then...
13:37:08 From Alberto Soto : Thanks, bye bye!!
13:37:21 From Vanda Scartezini : have a nice week all!!
13:37:27 From Sarah Kiden : Bye!
13:37:33 From Roberto : Bye
13:37:43 From Maureen Hilyard (ALAC) : Bye all
13:37:44 From hanan khatib : thank you all