Claudia Ruiz: (8/22/2018 10:34) Welcome to the At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call on Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 19:00 UTC

  Claudia Ruiz: (10:34) https://community.icann.org/x/0hZpBQ

  Evin Erdoğdu: (11:38) Hello all!

  Tijani BEN JEMAA: (11:45) Hi Evin & Claudia

  Evin Erdoğdu: (11:51) Hello Tijani!

  Evin Erdoğdu: (11:51) As well as Olivier, Holly and Cheryl :)

  Vanda Scartezini: (11:57) hi everyone.

  Vanda Scartezini: (11:58) i am in the listen only room

  Christopher Wilkinson: (12:00) Hello everyone, CW

  Vanda Scartezini: (12:00) the listen only is not working, it changed for join. I mute my phone anyway

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (12:00) Hi all...

  Carlton Samuels: (12:02) Howdy everybody

  Carlton Samuels: (12:02) No audio?

  Alfredo Calderon: (12:03) @Carlton, there is audio.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (12:03) Perfect

  Alfredo Calderon: (12:03) Fine

  Claudia Ruiz: (12:03) Welcome Alberto Soto

  Christopher Wilkinson: (12:03) Hearing well now

  Carlton Samuels: (12:04) Thanks Alfredo. Not hearing or seeing any evidence. Looks like a dial-in

  Alberto Soto: (12:04) Hello all! Thanks Claudia!

  Evin Erdoğdu: (12:05) AIs from last call: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Action+Items%3A+2018-08-15+Consolidated+Policy+Working+Group+Call

  Evin Erdoğdu: (12:06) We may discuss on this call, time permitting!

  Holly Raiche: (12:06) The sound has dropped

  Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (12:07) IIs PC = Public Comment?

  Alberto Soto: (12:07) 45/5000I have a lot of noise on my IP phone...

  Holly Raiche: (12:07) I can't hear anything

  Avri Doria: (12:07) sound still working fine for me.

  Maureen Hilyard: (12:07) @Holly Sound still clear for me

  Avri Doria: (12:07) i am in listen mode only on AC

  Holly Raiche: (12:07) I

  Maureen Hilyard: (12:08) Im on phone bridge

  Claudia Ruiz: (12:08) Welcome Evan Leibovitc

  Evin Erdoğdu: (12:08) Google Doc Proposal: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spreadsheets_d_1agNhbXfXLPQIRTGjC-2D8U-2Dl534SWpbnsiapi-2Dfi5mzFw_edit-3Fusp-3Dsharing&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=CXERzIws_vaPY8WrLB9yz2PICpecEh3yA9MaabnyyBk&m=LBmqzBR2hnsOkOKGnRekGoSBp-v039pMTxfUyElDy3E&s=tQBAwGa5dXI970CtijuR71KeNV2iZyt5GBiax9w1CPU&e=

  Holly Raiche: (12:08) ll go with that - May I please have a dial out again - thanks

  Evan Leibovitch: (12:08) Hi all.

  Greg Shatan: (12:08) Hi everybody!

  Claudia Ruiz: (12:08) Welcome Greg Shatan

  Alan Greenberg: (12:08) AOC: PC on Donut's Modification of Domains Protected Marks List Service

  Alberto Soto: (12:09) Sound does not work on my computer and the sound of the phone is still bad

  Holly Raiche: (12:09) @Evan - we have an action item to revisit metrics -

  Evan Leibovitch: (12:09) Oh goody :-)

  Holly Raiche: (12:10) We'll haave to do soemthing in the next few days

  Evin Erdoğdu: (12:11) Please send drafts to At-Large Staff email, subject line ACTION/EE - thanks!

  Yrjö Länsipuro: (12:11) I volunteered for Community Applications

  Evan Leibovitch: (12:12) Jonathan & Holly: I am happy to provide input on Metrics and Applicant support, though I don't have the cycles to actuially create.

  Christopher Wilkinson: (12:12) Universal acceptance is about the Registrars who don't want to service all new Registries Correct?

  Evin Erdoğdu: (12:12) Thank you at Yrjö, noted

  Evin Erdoğdu: (12:12) *@Yrjö :)

  Evan Leibovitch: (12:13) need to distinguish between Evin and Evan :-)

  Claudia Ruiz: (12:13) Welcome Sivasubramanian

  Claudia Ruiz: (12:13) Welcome Kristin Doan

  Christopher Wilkinson: (12:13) I provided a lot of input on medtrics for CCT-RT. I think what we need is a Staff output on metrics.

  Maureen Hilyard: (12:13)  @Holly agree on getting input from Don or Edmon

  Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (12:14) @Holly: are you referig to the UNiversl Acceptance or Metrics?

  Sivasubramanian M: (12:14) Thank you Claudia

  Holly Raiche: (12:15) @ Ed - Edmon and Don are the ones who have been involved in  IDN and universal acceptance

  Holly Raiche: (12:16) @ Edmon - for IDNs which we did support,, it was an issue

  Holly Raiche: (12:16) Sory - to Evan

  Carlton Samuels: (12:17) OK. I'm on the audio bridge. Heard just the tail end of Evan's comments.

  Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (12:17) That is what I was going to say about UA

  Maureen Hilyard: (12:17) Yes Christopher

  Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (12:17) Email not working

  Greg Shatan: (12:17) We are only talking about technical “acceptance” not universal enthusiasm....

  Jonathan Zuck: (12:17) and yes, I can go over the at large metrics. Most of the useful ones made it into the marketplace health indicators project

  Maureen Hilyard: (12:17) LOL Greg!

  Jonathan Zuck: (12:18) Yes, Greg

  Evan Leibovitch: (12:19) Good point. But If the issue is just technical acceptance, this is an advocacy rather than a policy efort (similar to the work done to date to encourage use of IPv6). As such I don't see much of a debate about it.

  Greg Shatan: (12:23) As a concept, UA is not particularly controversial.  The questions of how to advocate for it, who spends the money (and what money), where things are emphasized, etc.

  Holly Raiche: (12:25) @ Greg - agreed it isn't controversial - but it is about end users getting access - so maybe the issue  is, as you say, who spends what money

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:26) Doman Name Marketplace Health Index: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.domainpulse.com_2018_06_22_icann-2Dupdated-2Dgtld-2Dmarketplace-2Dhealth-2Dindex-2D2_&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=CXERzIws_vaPY8WrLB9yz2PICpecEh3yA9MaabnyyBk&m=LBmqzBR2hnsOkOKGnRekGoSBp-v039pMTxfUyElDy3E&s=kv8YEt_5tkkK8p5_p-qDhpioSenOzoOTT6cQlpbHe8A&e=

  Claudia Ruiz: (12:26) Welcome Bartlett Morgan

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (12:29) Ed has now been designated :-)

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (12:30) &Evaluation in Rounds* seems an important distinction to me Alan...

  Greg Shatan: (12:31) Agree with Alan.

  Nadira AL-Araj: (12:31) There are different options of rounds

  Holly Raiche: (12:31) Agree with both Alan and Olivier

  Greg Shatan: (12:31) There is no adequate design for continuous business.

  Maureen Hilyard: (12:32) We can hear you Carlton.. not sure what the noise is..

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (12:32) We can hear you Carlton but there is interfeering sound

  Holly Raiche: (12:33) Ssomeone call Carlton back

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:33) Jagged voice unfortunately

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:33) it a digital voice encoding error

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:33) (out of sync)

  Carlton Samuels: (12:33) I do

  Claudia Ruiz: (12:34)  Carlton the operator is going to dial out to you

  Carlton Samuels: (12:34) Regarding rounds, I cannot see why a fiirst-come-first-served principle does not apply here

  Nadira AL-Araj: (12:35) @carlton, I think there is no stabilty of the process yet

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:35) FCFS requires a constant number of staff ready to process applications whilst batching of processing is less costly

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:35) plus if we have FCFS that means that the RAA will never be updated ever

  Gordon Chillcott: (12:36) It appears we have a consensus decision to comment on this issue.

  Jonathan Zuck: (12:37) @Gordon but no consensus on what to say  ;)

  Vanda Scartezini: (12:37) I beleive I agree with Chistopher  it will be more clear for the applicants

  Evan Leibovitch: (12:38) @OCL: Not sure. Rounds infer peaks of heavy activity and long in-between periods of quiet. FCFS enables a smoothed-out resource demand, assuming that there is a time-based queue that can be services by staff at a stable pace.

  Carlton Samuels: (12:38) @Christopher: To say first come first served does not mean abandoning classes!

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:38) FCFS wil result in a land grab

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:38) just like what had happened in the .COM space at the second level

  Carlton Samuels: (12:40) @OCL: The land grab is not exclusive to FCFS. I would argue that this is precisely what we had in the 2012 round. Save and except we had a longer more involved process to disentangle the players.

  Evan Leibovitch: (12:40) The land grab will exist regardless. What rounds do is give us players come into contention merely to get paid off. We saw that in abundance in the last round.

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:40) @Carlton: with rounds it is possible to reserve some rounds solely for grands, and some for comunities. With FCFS what we are opning the door to is just the rich speculators

  Evan Leibovitch: (12:41) Auctions -- ICANN - run and private -- ensure that the richest win in rounds too.

  Greg Shatan: (12:41) Adobe Connect on a laptop does not put hands in the proper order, sadly.

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:41) The PDP has made it a lot harder to have private auctions

  Greg Shatan: (12:42) Sorry, meant to say tablet not laptop!

  Christopher Wilkinson: (12:42) +1 @alan on rounds

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:42) "solely for grands" -> "solely for brands"

  Greg Shatan: (12:42) My tablet thinks it’s a laptop, and it gets frustrated when it can’t do the same things....

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (12:43) I have another call I need to attend at the top of the hour, so I will drop phone bridge and remain in AC (via 2nd connection) for last 30 mins of the call... 

  Greg Shatan: (12:43) I have to go to the WT5 call then as well.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (12:44) Apols in advance for this...  BUT why do we constently overlap with Sub Pro meetings (in this case WT5 !)

  Yrjö Länsipuro: (12:44) I alsao have to leave for WT5

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:44) @Cheryl: because nobody has told the chairs beforehand about the sub pro WT5 meeting; I  learned about it today

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (12:45) I also would like to say something (important I believe) in this  Agenda item before I leave the audio bridge

  Christopher Wilkinson: (12:45) Leaving in 10 minutes to WT5

  Holly Raiche: (12:45) @ Jonathan/Olivier - if we keep on this debate, the EPDP will have to be cut short

  Tijani BEN JEMAA: (12:45) Absolutely agree Alan

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (12:45) Seems like as we clashed 2 weeks in a row that staff need to talk to eac other the PDP calls are planned well in advance

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:45) @Cheryl: exactly

  Dev Anand Teelucksingh: (12:46) @Cheryl - indeed, better staff coordination needed to avoid call clashes

  Jonathan Zuck: (12:46) I think Holly is talking about OUR discussion of the EPDP

  Holly Raiche: (12:47) Yep

  Christopher Wilkinson: (12:48) Evaluations will have to be done by experienced panels. Specific Rounds faciliitate specilaised evaluations.

  Evin Erdoğdu: (12:48) Google Doc: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spreadsheets_d_1agNhbXfXLPQIRTGjC-2D8U-2Dl534SWpbnsiapi-2Dfi5mzFw_edit-3Fusp-3Dsharing&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=CXERzIws_vaPY8WrLB9yz2PICpecEh3yA9MaabnyyBk&m=LBmqzBR2hnsOkOKGnRekGoSBp-v039pMTxfUyElDy3E&s=tQBAwGa5dXI970CtijuR71KeNV2iZyt5GBiax9w1CPU&e=

  Greg Shatan: (12:49) Party!

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:49) Party! :-)

  Carlton Samuels: (12:50) @Chris: Only if you believe the panelists for evaluations are only available in a certain window of time!

  Dev Anand Teelucksingh: (12:50) @Evin, is this Justine's document ?

  Yrjö Länsipuro: (12:50) Good reference on Community Applications is the Council of Europe report, critical on how CBA's were handled on the first round and with recommendations for subsequent rounds: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__rm.coe.int_16806b5a14&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=CXERzIws_vaPY8WrLB9yz2PICpecEh3yA9MaabnyyBk&m=LBmqzBR2hnsOkOKGnRekGoSBp-v039pMTxfUyElDy3E&s=ryGub6t_U2lzGlOEN67FGk6he7ZanxLmZh1mf4ut7TY&e=

  Alan Greenberg: (12:51) I've told WT5 I would be late because of this meeting.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (12:51) some of us *do try* to be helpful you know OCL :-)

  Nadira AL-Araj: (12:51) thanks Yrjö

  Carlton Samuels: (12:53) We have the evidence of the EIU's assessment outcomes. It is the evaluation criteria that requires more specificity, regardless of the experience of the evaluators.

  Kirstin Doan: (12:53) https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_files_framework-2Delements-2Dunified-2Daccess-2Dmodel-2Dfor-2Ddiscussion-2D20aug18-2Den.pdf&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=CXERzIws_vaPY8WrLB9yz2PICpecEh3yA9MaabnyyBk&m=LBmqzBR2hnsOkOKGnRekGoSBp-v039pMTxfUyElDy3E&s=twke5lQCZDkrv07JpH2kgFTeENS25GIYx5JYLzqPFus&e=

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:53) Thanks that is great

  Evin Erdoğdu: (12:54) Thank you @Kirstin!

  Kirstin Doan: (12:54) NP :D

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (12:54) Thx Greg

  Evin Erdoğdu: (12:56) Current page: https://community.icann.org/x/wwA5BQ

  Evin Erdoğdu: (12:56) Will be updated

  Greg Shatan: (12:56) Thanks, all!

  Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (12:59) What was the issue between WHO IS an Private Law?

  Greg Shatan: (12:59) The real issue was how the EPDP should deal with existing policies.

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (12:59) @Evin: I guess the status for this will need to be re-opened & morphed from "no comment"

  Greg Shatan: (13:00) The discussion devolved into many less fruitful, slightly related topics.

  Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (13:02) MAybe they need to meet outside the BAacelona Venue

  Evin Erdoğdu: (13:02) @Olivier will do!

  Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (13:02) Olivier has a point

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) 2: (13:03) exactly Carlton...and the Membership is supposed to be representing there sendergroups opinions!!!

  Dev Anand Teelucksingh: (13:06) jumping to the WT5 call, take care

  Claudia Ruiz: (13:07) Thank you Dev Anand Teelucksingh for joining

  Vanda Scartezini: (13:10) I need to leave. thsnk to all for a productive meeting

  Claudia Ruiz: (13:10) Thank you Vanda for Joining

  Evin Erdoğdu: (13:13) v1.7 wiki workspace: https://community.icann.org/x/CwA5BQ

  Tijani BEN JEMAA: (13:15) Jonathan, if everyone draft what he wants, we will need someone to compile and harmonize the different parts

  Tijani BEN JEMAA: (13:16) Otherwise, it will be a mess

  Evin Erdoğdu: (13:16) Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Penholders and Resources Workspace: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Consolidated+Policy+Working+Group+%28CPWG%29+Penholders+and+Resources+Workspace

  Jonathan Zuck: (13:18) Yes, Tijani I gues that's my role on SubProc

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) 2: (13:18) productive call...thank you people!!! bye for now...

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) 2: (13:19) hide some columns

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) 2: (13:19) unhide them later

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) 2: (13:21) that was referring to the spreadsheet of course

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) 2: (13:21)  sorry busy inmWT5 call as well

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) 2: (13:22) thanks team and HELL YEAH @Jonathen!!!!

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) 2: (13:22) no AOB from me...

  Maureen Hilyard: (13:22) +1 Jonathan.. Im off to the WT5 call now..

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) 2: (13:23) I switched rooms so no scroll back sorry AG

  Holly Raiche: (13:23) Can we close the call

  Bartlett Morgan: (13:24) a rare moment - Alan giving up :--)

  Alfredo Calderon: (13:24) Leaving to WT5 meeting.

  Alfredo Calderon: (13:24) Til next week.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) 2: (13:24) BYE thx OCL and JZ

  Evin Erdoğdu: (13:24) Thank you all!

  Carlton Samuels: (13:24) Thanks all, bye all

  Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond: (13:25) @Tijani: I think that's what Jonathan proposes he does

  • No labels