At-Large ATRT 2 ALAC Endorsement Process Workspace

Region

Member

Office

AFRALO/ALAC

Yaovi Atohoun

APRALO/ALAC

Holly Raiche

EURALO/ALAC

Olivier Crépin-Leblond

Non-voting observer

EURALO

Sandra Hoferichter

27 Nov 2012 (Tue)

Tabling of Key Decision Points to the ALAC

14 Dec 2012 (Fri)

Deadline for ALAC comments on candidate assessment matrix

14 Dec 2012 (Fri)

Deadline for Committee formation

17-20 Dec 2012 (Mon-Thu)

Committee discussion on overall process and matrix proxy indicators refinement

7-11 Jan 2013 (Mon-Fri)

Committee validation of matrix proxy indicators + test review of sample applications

14 Jan 2013 (Mon)

Candidate application deadline for ATRT2

15 Jan 2013 (Tue)

Staff sends out matrix assessment form listing all ALAC candidates to Committee members

15-17Jan 2013 (Tue-Thu)

Individual Assessment: Committee members review candidate applications and make initial individual assessments

18 Jan 2013 (Fri)

Committee Meeting to discuss candidates

19 Jan 2013 (Sat)

Committee Members submit individual assessments

20 Jan 2013 (Sun)

Staff tabulates results

21 Jan 2013 (Mon)

Staff circulates results to Committee

22-23 Jan 2013 (Tue-Wed)

Committee Meeting to review aggregate ranking, discuss and confirm candidate order

24-27 Jan 2013 (Thu-Sun)

ALAC 4-day ratification vote on endorsed candidates

28 Jan 2013 (Mon)

Deadline for SO/AC announcement of endorsed candidates and submission to ATRT2 staff

15 Feb 2013

ATRT2 candidate selection by ICANN Board Chair and GAC Chair

March  2013

ATRT2 work commences

ALAC ATRT2 CANDIDATE ASSESSMENT (2012-2013)

Name of Evaluator:

Evaluation Criteria

Part A: Criteria 1-5 (80% weightage)

Part B: Criteria 6-8 (20% weightage)

Part C: Total Candidate Score 

 PART  A – CORE CRITERIA

Subjective Scoring 1-5 (5 highest, 1 lowest)

Proxy Indicators

Candidate 1

Score

Candidate 2

Score

Candidate 3

Score

1.  Accountability to the ALAC and At-Large 

Elected or appointed to the ALAC/Leadership roles

2. Trusted by the Community

Known to the ALAC & At-Large community/Leadership roles with no recall/Extended leadership roles

3. Knowledge of ICANN and its working practices and culture

Years engaging ICANN

Cross-community experiences

4.  Knowledge of the Subject Area of Review (see *)

• ICANN Board governance
• GAC role and effectiveness
• GAC-Board interaction
• ICANN Public input process
• Community & public acceptance/support of ICANN decisions
• Policy development process 

Years of experience/Opinion leader or considered as an expert

5. Analytical skills & Ability to interpret quantitative and qualitative evidence

Successfully drafted (or contributed input to) statements/reports that required analysis of data/information involving complex issues that required an understanding of qualitative and quantitative data

SUB-TOTAL [PART A]

OVERALL COMMENTS

[PART A]

 *Subject Area of Review (Extracted from ATRT2 Call for Volunteers)

1. Continually assessing and improving ICANN Board of Directors (Board) governance which shall include an ongoing evaluation of Board performance, the Board selection process, the extent to which Board composition meets ICANN's present and future needs, and the consideration of an appeal mechanism for Board decisions;
2. Assessing the role and effectiveness of the GAC and its interaction with the Board and making recommendations for improvement to ensure effective consideration by ICANN of GAC input on the public policy aspects of the technical coordination of the DNS;
3. Continually assessing and improving the processes by which ICANN receives public input (including adequate explanation of decisions taken and the rationale thereof);
4. Continually assessing the extent to which ICANN's decisions are embraced, supported and accepted by the public and the Internet community; and
5. Assessing the policy development process to facilitate enhanced cross community deliberations, and effective and timely policy development.

 PART  B – SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA

Subjective Scoring 1-5 (5 highest, 1 lowest)

Proxy Indicators

Candidate 1

Score

Candidate 2

Score

Candidate 3

Score

6. Team spirit, adaptability, consensus-seeking attitude

Peer Ranking

7. Willingness to learn

Peer Ranking

8. Capacity to reason objectively, putting aside personal opinions or preconceptions & Capacity to draw conclusions purely based on evidence

Peer Ranking

9. Commitment to devote sufficient personal time to review process

Demonstration of sufficient time commitment in other areas of work

SUB-TOTAL [PART B]

OVERALL COMMENTS

[PART B]

 PART C – TOTAL CANDIDATE SCORE

Candidate 1

Total Score

Candidate 2

Total Score

Candidate 3

Total Score

TOTAL: 80% (PART A) + 20% (PART B)

CANDIDATE RANK

ALAC ATRT2 AGGREGATE CANDIDATE SCORE AND RANK