15:43:34 From Yeşim Saglam - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Welcome to At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call taking place on Wednesday, 01 June 2022 at 13:00 UTC.
15:43:45 From Yeşim Saglam - ICANN Org to Everyone:
Agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/2AHuCw
15:48:24 From Bill Jouris to Everyone:
No regrets. ;-) I didn't expect to make it, but sometimes life throw up these little surprises.
15:49:03 From Yeşim Saglam - ICANN Org to Everyone:
welcome Bill
16:01:11 From Carlos Dionisio Aguirre to Everyone:
hi all
16:01:35 From Carlos Dionisio Aguirre to Everyone:
dial out ES, please. thanks
16:03:08 From Yeşim Saglam - ICANN Org to Everyone:
We don't have interpretation services this week as it's ICANN74 Prep Week
16:05:09 From Dave Kissoondoyal (ICANN ALAC) to Everyone:
Hello everyone.. sorry for being late
16:05:25 From Hadia El Miniawi to Everyone:
Hello all
16:05:44 From John McCormac - HosterStats.com to Everyone:
Morning/Afternoon/Evening all.
16:09:03 From Gerardo Mtz. FELLOW ICANN74 to Everyone:
Hello all
16:10:33 From Sébastien Bachollet to Everyone:
To At-Large please
16:11:15 From Sébastien Bachollet to Everyone:
« At-Large » Michael
16:13:11 From Gopal Tadepalli to Everyone:
Greetings. I am sorry for joining late. - Dr. T V Gopal, Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Guindy Campus, Anna University , Chennai, INDIA.
16:19:47 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Thanos?! wow
16:20:24 From Justine Chew to Everyone:
"Not Thanos snap", @JZ.
16:21:08 From Bill Jouris to Everyone:
Having multiple verification sources available sounds great. perhaps this philosophy could be extended to having multiple registries available for a particular gTLD. Just a thought.
16:23:26 From Raymond Mamattah to Everyone:
Greetings from Accra, Ghana
16:26:36 From Sivasubramanian M to Everyone:
@Michael <question> In the context of SSAD's Registrant Verification and Accreditation of the Requester, are the "Credential Issuer" and "Identity Provider", or partners in various classes --- are they all parties who follow open standards and provide open access, or does the suggested process necessitate usage of services by ICANN, Requestors and Requestors that they would otherwise normally not use, and does it involve recurrent and ongoing payment of subscription and usage fees by ICANN, Requestors and Registrants at various levels?
16:28:59 From Sivasubramanian M to Everyone:
It is a useful design, the design of Registration process integrating identify verification.
16:29:17 From Dave Kissoondoyal (ICANN ALAC) to Everyone:
+1 Siva
16:31:59 From Carlos Dionisio Aguirre to Everyone:
thanks @sebastian
16:32:12 From Sivasubramanian M to Everyone:
Did I hear, "the data is stored? with the identify provider"??? Not sure. But the question is: Is the data submitted by the Registrant in any way exposed to or stored by the identify provider in the process of retrieving identity verification information ?
16:36:15 From Lutz Donnerhacke to Everyone:
I just scanned the QR-code but did not get Access. What do I wrong?
16:39:34 From Michael Palage to Everyone:
@Lutz we can address your QR code at the end
16:42:49 From Sivasubramanian M to Everyone:
<question> If the .music SSAD design is to be adopted across gTLDs and ccTLDs, or if adopted by ICANN and implemented across gTLDs and ccTLDs in a harmonized platform, what components of the SSAD design is 'generic' and what is now unique to .music that would require the g&ccTLD registries to modify and alter their service components?
16:47:49 From Justine Chew to Everyone:
@Michael, @Frank, I can't wait for your explanation for if a registry or registrar doesn't have a registrant verification policy. You mentioned parts of what you're proposing being modular.
16:48:21 From Sivasubramanian M to Everyone:
<question> What is the need for sharing or storing Registry data with the identify provider, in the name of "data localization" or by whatever name? DNS data is DNS data.
16:51:31 From Sivasubramanian M to Everyone:
I am a Registrant happy with parting my registration data with an accredited Registrar, and by extension with the Registry, now does the proposal require me to choose an identity provider with whom the Registration data is to be shared as an additional layer?
16:53:05 From Brian King to Everyone:
@Siva, one benefit is that your actual data could be stored only at your chosen identity provider, and the registry and registrar could merely have pseudonymized or privacy/proxy data and not your actual data.
16:53:13 From Sivasubramanian M to Everyone:
(these options are good)
16:55:28 From Alberto Soto to Everyone:
Dear, I must retire to another meeting. Thanks. Bye bye!
16:55:42 From Sivasubramanian M to Everyone:
@Brian That is not a good idea. As a Registrant I would like my identify information stay with the DNS, the identity provider, in an alternate and more appropriate model for SSAD, would identity and do no more, for example, would confirm that the person whose identity is sought to be verified is indeed the person, going by the Driving Licence records, if the identity provider (verifier) in this case is the DL Authority. The identity verifier would verify and sign off.
16:56:11 From Hadia El Miniawi to Everyone:
Thank you all for this presentation
16:56:26 From Hadia El Miniawi to Everyone:
great work
16:56:54 From John McCormac - HosterStats.com to Everyone:
Excellent presentation.
16:56:55 From Brian King to Everyone:
@Siva, that is interesting. I think the policy options that can be layered onto this could facilitate that outcome.
16:57:31 From Sivasubramanian M to Everyone:
.... That is not a good ..... my identity information stay with the DNS (.) (STOP) The identify provider, in an alternate ....
16:57:32 From Justine Chew to Everyone:
Thank you!
16:57:44 From Amrita Choudhury to Everyone:
Thanks for the presentation
16:57:45 From Brian King to Everyone:
To be clear, I am here as Clarivate's representative for trademark verification purposes, not in my typical role as MarkMonitor. Questions welcome :-)
16:58:46 From Denise Hochbaum to Everyone:
It is a great presentation! Many thanks!
16:58:50 From Greg Shatan to Everyone:
Now that Olivier is on are we re-starting the meeting?
16:59:12 From Michael Palage to Everyone:
Thanks again everyone
16:59:28 From Brian King to Everyone:
Unfortunately I need to run to an IPC leadership call. Thank you for having us! Look forward to seeing many of you in The Hague. Bye!
16:59:33 From Greg Shatan to Everyone:
We are gone in 60 seconds.
16:59:43 From Herb Waye Ombuds to Everyone:
Off to ICANN74… stay safe and be kind.
17:00:28 From Greg Shatan to Everyone:
Au revoir!
17:00:40 From John McCormac - HosterStats.com to Everyone:
Thanks and later all.
17:00:43 From Satish Babu to Everyone:
Thanks and bye!
17:00:48 From Dave Kissoondoyal (ICANN ALAC) to Everyone:
Thanks and bye to all
17:00:51 From Nthabiseng Pule to Everyone:
Thanks and bye!
17:00:53 From Hadia El Miniawi to Everyone:
Thanks all bye
17:01:09 From Sivasubramanian M to Everyone:
Thankyou
AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
