 Objective
|
|---|
Background Documents
- ICANN web page on WHOIS Policies, including the following WHOIS-related policies and procedures adopted since 2012:
- Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy
- Additional WHOIS Information Policy (AWIP)
- New gTLD URS Policy, Procedure and Rules for URS Policy
- Expired Registration Recovery Policy (ERRP)
- Thick WHOIS PDP and Final Report – see section 7.1 for Thick WHOIS Policy
- Thick RDDS (WHOIS) Transition Policy for .COM, .NET and .JOBS
- Registry Registration Data Directory Services Consistent Labeling and Display Policy
- Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues (PPSAI) PDP and Final Report
- Translation/Transliteration of Contact Information PDP and Final Report
- Final Report from the Expert Working Group on Internationalized Registration Data (2015)
Procedure for Handling RDS/WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law (2008)
- Review of the ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law (2014)
- Final Report on the Implementation Advisory Group Review of Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling Whois Conflicts with Privacy Laws (2016)
- Revised ICANN Procedure For Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law (2017)
- RDS/WHOIS Data Retention Specification Waiver and Discussion Document
- Additional links specific to Subgroup 2 may be added here
Further background documents may be found on the Review Team's overall Background Materials page.
ICANN Answers/Input
|
|---|
Subgroup Documents
Open Actions/Requests
*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert
| Item # | Source of Request | Date of Request | Action Item Request | Action Owner | Anticipated Completion Date* | Progress Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | #27 | ICANN org to move forward and reflect agreements from Brussels face-to-face meeting #2 in the subgroup draft report shell. | ICANN org | |||
| 8 | #26 |
| Formulate text describing the lack of strategic plan for WHOIS leads to disjoint development of policies and procedures | Stephanie |
Completed Actions/Requests
*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert
| Item # | Source of Request | Date of Request | Action Item Request | Action Owner | Anticipated Completion Date* | Progress Notes | Completed Response | Completion Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | #25 |
| Stephanie to send draft to subgroup/RT in parallel by COB today (Friday 6 April) | Stephanie | OVERDUE | |||
| 6 | #2 |
| Prepare additional questions (if any) for ICANN SMEs based on reading | Stephanie | Addressed during face-to-face meeting #2 |
| ||
| 5 | #2 |
| Provide findings to subgroup on CLDP | Susan | Addressed during face-to-face meeting #2 |
| ||
| 4 | #2 |
| Question to ICANN compliance: On AWIP and ERRP, what does compliance audit for these policies, and what compliance issues has compliance encountered? | ICANN org |
|
| ||
| 7 | #2 |
| Provide a base doc for this subgroup, into which Rapporteur can insert her summary of findings | ICANN org |
| Sent to Rapporteur |
| |
| 2 | #22 |
| Consider need to review procedure for handling conflict, and to assess the need to review each of the identified items in depth. | Subgroup | ||||
| 2 | #22 |
| Assess which policy/procedures will be addressed and which ressources will be needed to do so. | Subgroup | ||||
| 1 | #1 |
| ICANN Org to circulate a list of policies in a format that enables subgroup members to identify their "top 5" new/updated policies to examine and briefly why. Subgroup members to reply to subgroup mailing list no later than next Thursday. The subgroup will then reconvene to discuss priorities and determine next steps. | ICANN org | See email sent to subgroup. |
|
Decisions Reached
| Source | Date | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| #2 |
| Agreement on conflicts with privacy law - WHOIS and national law conflicts IAG Home. The subgroup will make observations about dissatisfaction with procedure and likely GDPR impact, but will not make recommendation at this time |
| #2 |
| T/T is deferred to IDN subgroup |
| #1 |
| Subgroup to prioritize polices and procedures identified in the provided inventory, and then use results to answer for top priority items:
This prioritization will not remove other items from consideration, but rather help the subgroup begin work on top-priority items. |
