You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 8 Next »


    At-Large Session Reports

    Resources:

    Objective is to keep these reports brief and focused on what At-Large should do in terms of next steps. Reports to be presented during the Thursday At-Large Wrap-Up session.

    Report format:

    What happened?

      • Item 1
      • Item 2

    What are the At-Large specific takeaways from this session? 

      • Item 1
      • Item 2

    What are the At-Large specific action items (next steps)?

      • Item 1
      • Item 2


    Session

    Date/Time (local) Rapporteur Report Photos (Optional)
    Example Title Date/Time  @example name

    Use template:

    What happened?

    Example: This session discussed....

    What are the At-Large specific takeaways from this session? 

    Example: At-Large is interested in...

    What are the At-Large specific action items (next steps)?

    Example: At-Large needs to... 



    Session

    Date/Time (local) Rapporteur Report Photos (Optional)

    GNSO: IDN EPDP Working Session

    Agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/TgBUEQ

    Saturday, 2 March at 09:00

    What happened?

    This session discussed two outstanding issues from the Charter Questions from Phase 2 of the EPDP on IDNs. These were: (a) Whether or not the EPDP should make a recommendation on the need for registries to evolve their own systems for IDN Table Harmonization; and (b) If the information returned by RDDS should include information on the variant set, noting that RDDS does not currently provide for information on variants.

    What are the At-Large specific takeaways from this session? 

    IDN Table Harmonization is important for end-users amongst other stakeholders as harmonization ensures that there is a consistent and predictable way second-level labels behave at the second level. However, registries have difficulties in accepting any binding recommendation on how harmonization should be done.

    End-users and registrants need a single source of information regarding variants, particularly delegated variants. Although RDDS doesn't currently provide information on variants, it is not difficult for registries to provide information on delegated variants.

    What are the At-Large specific action items?
    The ALAC team highlighted the fact that both registrants and end-users would benefit if there was a single consistent way second-level strings behave in different scripts. IDN Table harmonization contributes to this consistency and therefore is desirable. 

    On the RDDS search output, registrants and end-users should be able to access authoritative information on variants, especially the delegated variants of a primary label. 

    Next Steps
    For String Harmonization, the EPDP team from Registries, registrars and ICANN Technical Staff will discuss further on how the current language may be modified to the satisfaction of everyone.

    On RDDS, EPDP team needs to discuss further how to make information on variants accessible to everyone that requires it.



    GDS: Subpro IRT Work Session (1 of 3)

    Agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/ZYAvEQ

    Saturday, 2 March at 10:30

    Use template


    GNSO: Transfer Policy Review PDP Working Group (1 of 2)

    Agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/5gBUEQ

    Saturday, 2 March at 13:15

    Use template


    ccNSO: Universal Acceptance Committee Work Session

    Agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/MIEJEQ

    Saturday, 2 March at 13:15 Laura Margolis  

    Use template


    ccNSO: DNS Abuse Standing Committee Community Update

    Agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/MIEJEQ

    Saturday, 2 March at 15:00 Aris Ignacio 

    Use template


    GNSO: Transfer Policy Review PDP Working Group (2 of 2)

    Agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/5gBUEQ

    Saturday, 2 March at 15:00 Shah Zahidur Rahman 

    Use template


    Session

    Date/Time (local) Rapporteur Report Photos (Optional)






    Session

    Date/Time (local) Rapporteur Report Photos (Optional)

    GDS: Subpro IRT Work Session (2 of 3)

    Agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/boAvEQ

    Monday, 4 March at 16:15

    Use template



    GAC Discussion on DNS Abuse Mitigation

    Monday, 4 March at 16:15

    Use template


    Session

    Date/Time (local) Rapporteur Report Photos (Optional)

    Reviews Program Session with the Community on ATRT4 Deferral and Pilot Holistic Review


    Tuesday, 5 March at 9:00 Sebastien Bachollet 

    Use template


    New gTLD Program Next Round: Planning for String Similarity Review Work Session

    Tuesday, 5 March at 15:00 Bill Jouris 

    Use template



    Session

    Date/Time (local) Rapporteur Report Photos (Optional)

    UA Day 2024 Overview Work Session

    Wednesday, 6 March at 9:00 Laura Margolis  

    Use template


    Continuous Improvement Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG) Meeting

    Wednesday, 6 March at 10:30 Sebastien Bachollet 

    Use template



    GNSO SubPro Supplemental Recommendations Community Consultation

    Agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/1oBkEQ

    Wednesday, 6 March at 10:30 Tijani Ben Jemaa 

    Use template


    GNSO: Registrars and ICANN: Validation, Verification, and Accuracy - Oh My!

    Agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/UAFUEQ

    Wednesday, 6 March at 10:30 Eduardo Diaz 

    Use template



    FY26-30 Strategic Plan Development Community Consultation

    Wednesday, 6 March at 10:30 Claire Craig 

    Use template



    IFR2 Team Meeting and Work Session

    Wednesday, 6 March at 13:15

    Use template



    ICANN Grant Program

    Wednesday, 6 March at 15:00

    Use template



    GDS: Subpro IRT Work Session (3 of 3)

    Agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/doAvEQ


    Wednesday, 6 March at 16:15

    Use template


    Session

    Date/Time (local) Rapporteur Report Photos (Optional)

    GNSO Council Small Team Plus - SubPro Supplemental Recommendations Work Session

    Agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/6ABUEQ

    Thursday, 7 March at 9:00 Tijani Ben Jemaa 

    Use template


    Informes de la sesión de At-Large de ICANN79

    Formato del informe:

    ¿Qué sucedió?

      • Tema 1
      • Tema 2

    ¿Cuáles son las conclusiones clave específicas de At-Large de esta sesión? 

      • Tema 1
      • Tema 2

    ¿Cuáles son los puntos de acción específicos de At-Large (próximos pasos)?

      • Tema 1
      • Tema 2

     

    Sesión

    Fecha y hora (local)

    Relator

    Informe

    Fotos (opcional)




    ¿Qué sucedió?

    Ejemplo: Esta sesión debatió...

    ¿Cuáles son las conclusiones clave específicas de At-Large de esta sesión? 

    Ejemplo: At-Large está interesado en...

    ¿Cuáles son los puntos de acción específicos de At-Large (próximos pasos)?

    Ejemplo: At-Large necesita... 







    Rapports de séance d’At-Large de l’ICANN79 

    Format du rapport :

    Que s’est-il passé ?

      • Item 1
      • Item 2

    Quels sont les principaux points à retenir de cette séance ? 

      • Item 1
      • Item 2

    Quelles sont les mesures spécifiques à prendre (étapes suivantes) ?

      • Item 1
      • Item 2

     

    Séance

    Date/heure (locale)

    Rapporteur

    Rapport

    Photos (facultatif)




    Que s’est-il passé ?

    Exemple : Lors de cette séance, la discussion a porté sur...

    Quels sont les principaux points à retenir de cette séance ? 

    Exemple : At-large s’intéresse à...

    Quelles sont les mesures spécifiques à prendre (étapes suivantes) ?

    Exemple : At-Large a besoin de... 







    • No labels