You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

 

ALAC ATRT2 Candidate Endorsement Process: Revised Timeline (See Announcement of extension of call for volunteers to 14 January 2013)

27 Nov 2012 (Tue)

Tabling of Key Decision Points to the ALAC

14 Dec 2012 (Fri)

Deadline for ALAC comments on candidate assessment matrix

14 Dec 2012 (Fri)

Deadline for Committee formation

17-20 Dec 2012 (Mon-Thu)

Committee discussion on overall process and matrix proxy indicators refinement

7-11 Jan 2013 (Mon-Fri)

Committee validation of matrix proxy indicators + test review of sample applications

14 Jan 2013 (Mon)

Candidate application deadline for ATRT2

15 Jan 2013 (Tue)

Staff sends out matrix assessment form listing all ALAC candidates to Committee members

15-17Jan 2013 (Tue-Thu)

Individual Assessment: Committee members review candidate applications and make initial individual assessments

18 Jan 2013 (Fri)

Committee Meeting to discuss candidates

19 Jan 2013 (Sat)

Committee Members submit individual assessments

20 Jan 2013 (Sun)

Staff tabulates results

21 Jan 2013 (Mon)

Staff circulates results to Committee

22-23 Jan 2013 (Tue-Wed)

Committee Meeting to review aggregate ranking, discuss and confirm candidate order

24-27 Jan 2013 (Thu-Sun)

ALAC 4-day ratification vote on endorsed candidates

28 Jan 2013 (Mon)

Deadline for SO/AC announcement of endorsed candidates and submission to ATRT2 staff

15 Feb 2013

ATRT2 candidate selection by ICANN Board Chair and GAC Chair

March  2013

ATRT2 work commences

 

Members

 

ALAC ATRT2 Candidate Endorsement: Assessment Matrix

Subjective Ranking 1-5 (5 highest, 1 lowest)

Name of Reviewer:

Evaluation Criteria

Proxy Indicators

(These are examples. Actual Proxy Indicators to be developed by Ad-Hoc Sub-Committee)

Candidate 1

Name

Link to Application

Candidate 2

Name

Link to Application

Candidate 3

Name

Link to Application

0. Completed application including filed SOI by 5 Dec 2012

 

Yes/No

Yes/No

Yes/No

1.  Accountability to the ALAC and At-Large 

Elected or appointed to the ALAC/Leadership roles

 

 

 

2. Trusted by the Community

Known to the ALAC & At-Large community/Leadership roles with no recall/Extended leadership roles

 

 

 

3. Knowledge of ICANN and its working practices and culture

Years engaging ICANN/Cross-community experiences

 

 

 

4.  Knowledge of the Subject Area of Review

Years of experience/Opinion leader or considered as an expert

 

 

 

5. Team spirit, adaptability, consensus-seeking attitude

Peer Ranking

 

 

 

6. Willingness to learn

Peer Ranking

 

 

 

7. Capacity to reason objectively, putting aside personal opinions or preconceptions

Peer Ranking

 

 

 

8. Analytical skills

Successfully drafted (or contributed input to) statements/reports that required analysis of data/information

 

 

 

9. Ability to interpret quantitative and qualitative evidence

Successfully drafted (or contributed input to) statements/reports involving complex issues that required an understanding of qualitative and quantitative data

 

 

 

10. Capacity to draw conclusions purely based on evidence

Peer Ranking

 

 

 

12. Commitment to devote sufficient personal time to review process

Demonstration of sufficient time commitment in other areas of work

 

 

 

Total Ranking    
Overall Comments (optional)    
  • No labels