Page History

Rec D: David to provide input to Drew, rec will be discussed on next subteam call.

David

Rec C: Recommendation to be circulated with the review team ahead of tomorrow's plenary call.

Rec 40, 41, 42: ICANN org to send amended recommentadions together with other recommendations fields to David for final verification. Upon greenlight, recommendations to be shared with the review team for review/approval.

Rec. 40: ICANN org to update last sentence of rec. 40 with : "The CCT acknowledges that the study was carried out in 2017 by a Nielsen survey of INTA members that yielded a lower response rate than anticipated. We note that this study should be more user friendly and perhaps shorter in order to help ensure a higher and more statistically significant response rate."

Drew to update recommendation E and submit it for discussion on next safeguards and trust subteam call.

Drew to circulate success measures via email on recommendations A, B, C.

ICANN org to update the document submitted by David on Rec 40, 41, 42, by adding the original “To, Priority, Details, and Success Measures”: See new version attached.

• Subteam to review the recommendations 40, 41, 42, and discuss/confirm whether the “To, Priority, Details, and Success Measures” fields need to be updated as per the new recommendation text.

ICANN org

Subteam

David/Drew to discuss and update recommendation D, and submit it for discussion on next safeguards and trust subteam call.

David/Drew to refine language of Recommendation D and share for comment on the subteam list

David to work on Rec. 40, 41, 42 consolidation and share for comment on the subteam list

Drew to update recommendation C language based on input received during the call. Subteam to send any further comments to Drew.

Rec 40: David to add more context to the rationale concerning the sample size of the INTA study and how the data is indicative of trends. David to share an updated version of his paper based on input received prior to tomorrow’s plenary call

Rec A: Laureen to suggest new language to rationale/related findings section.

Drew to send an email to the review team for them to review the latest version of the DNS Abuse Chapter before the plenary call tomorrow.

Rec B.: Drew to correct typo.

Gao to consolidate  recs. 13 & 15 into a single recommendation, and explain in an email how your consolidation relates to the public comments received, and send via email to the subgroup by the end of the week.

Rec. 24: Calvin to circulate proposal to strike Rec.24 to review team, and submit for approval on plenary call next week.

Rec 24: Calvin to recirculate recommendation, including his concern that the recommendation and contract language might not be consistent.

Rec 16:

• Laureen/Carlos to change the rationale/related finding to add a reference to the DNS Abuse Study and the correlation between registration restriction and DNS Abuse.
• On point (3) in recommendation, Laureen/Carlos to change that focus on whether registration restrictions "reduce" DNS Abuse. Add a reference that acknowledges Review Team already has a finding from the DNS Abuse study that registration restrictions decrease DNS Abuse.

Laureen to resend email including action items on draft report updates, which was sent out before ICANN60.

Rec. 16: Carlos & Laureen to refocus recommendation to focus on data collection needed for the next review team rather than a specific study. 

Rec 13, 15, 33: To be consolidated: 

• Laureen to consider whether it will be a part of the earlier larger recommendation on conducting a single end- user survey.
• Jordyn to consolidate registrant survey recommendations and Laureen to address end-user survey recommendations for possible consolidation. 
• Laureen to figure out if 33 is consolidated or stands alone.

Laureen

Jordyn/Laureen

Laureen

Rec 14: Jonathan, David and Carlos to confer on a recommendation to promote a diversity of business models for New gTLDs (monoculture antidote). It will ultimately result in a recommendation affecting Consumer Choice & Consumer Trust sections. Jamie to help on including rationale from rec 35, 36 in rec 14.

Subteam members to be ready to contribute to document our response to public comments received.

Subteam members to add "Success Measures" and "Details" when missing in your assigned recommendation

Confirm whether ICANN Compliance has statistics on DNS abuse and complaints filed and whether they are resolved with a take down or not.

Rec 21, 22, 23 to be discussed further on the next subteam's call, meanwhile please address your comments to Carlton/Laureen via email

Rec. 31, 32: Fabro to include summary of public comments received on these recommendations, and add a revised version of the rationale.

Drew to share his input on consolidation of PICs recommendations by next week

6. DNS Abuse: Rec 19, 34 (Drew) - Consolidation conditionally approved. (same priority level: High)

7. Complaints: Rec. 21, 22, 23 (Carlton): Conditionally approved with High priority (different priority level rec.  23 = High, while other are Medium)

Other: Rec. 13, 15, 33 (Gao): No need for consolidation.

• If you were unable to attend the call, please share your input on the above consolidation suggestion, and on the consolidations identified last week.
• For leaders of consolidated recommendations, consider revision for all the corresponding text and weigh in the need to adapt the narratives.

Rec 10. (RPMs) David to look at the recommendation and consider whether that can be combined with recommendations 40 to 42.

Rec. 16: Laureen to look into possible consolidation with other recommendations linked to juridiction restrictions.

Rec 19, 34 (DNS Abuse Study) and 38, 39 (Pics): Drew to consolidate.

Rec 21.22.23 (Complaints Mechanisms): Laureen and Carlton to liaise together and review the proposed consolidation.

Rec 25-30 (Highly Regulated gTLDs): Laureen to review whether these can be consolidated. All to circulate to the group their suggestions for recommendations consolidation by Friday, this week. Wiki: Staff to build a dedicated page for draft report updates.

David

Laureen

Drew

Laureen/Carlton

Laureen

Laureen and Calvin to connect on Technical Safeguards

Ping David and make sure he is engaged in his topics

Carlos to connect with Drew on paper 6

Gao to connect with her sub team to ensure engagement

Fabro to connect with David

In g-doc finalize analysis of your assigned sources (inventory) and mark in green if useful

In g-doc finalize analysis of your assigned sources (inventory) and mark in green if useful

Drew, Calvin, Gao, Carlton, David, Jamie, Laureen, Fabro

In g-doc finalize analysis of your assigned sources (inventory) and mark in green if useful

In g-doc finalize analysis of your assigned sources (inventory) and mark in green if useful.

Discuss vendor options with security team