EN: Olivier Crepin-Leblond, Maureen Hilyard, Jonathan Zuck, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Kaili Kan, , Gordon Chillcott, Maria Korniiets, Tijani Ben Jemma, Christopher Wilkinson, Alfredo Calderon, Eduardo Diaz, Alan Greenberg, Joel Thayer, Avri Doria, Judith Hellerstein, Nadira Al-Araj, Leon Sanchez, John Laprise, Vanda Scartezini, Carlton Samuels, Marita Moll, Ricardo Holmquist, Yrjo Lansipuro, Sebastien Bachollet, Roberto Gaetano, Justine Chew, Joanna Kulezsa,

ES: Alberto Soto

Apologies: Hadia Elimiawi, Yrjö LänsipuroHolly Raiche, Lilian Ivette De Luque Bruges

Staff: Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Evin Erdoğdu, Gisella GruberHerb Wayne, Claudia Ruiz

ES Interpreters: Paula and Claudia

Call Management: Claudia Ruiz

...

Web Page of EPDP
EPDP on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data
Keep Up with EPDP on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data
EPDP Background Documents

Agenda -

...

EN

1. Welcome and roll call - staff (2 minutes)

2. Adoption of agenda, review of Action Items 14 August - Olivier Crepin-Leblond (3 minutes)

3. EPDP Phase II Update -

...

Alan Greenberg (15 minutes)

4. SubPro Updates - Justine Chew (10 minutes)

...

View file

name	WT5 21 August 2019 v1.pdf
height	250

5

...

.

...

See draft questions in EN | Ver borradores de preguntas en ES

...

CPWG Charter & "Ideal" Process - Jonathan Zuck and all (

...

20 minutes)

View file

name	CPWG Charter & Process.pdf
height	250

» Please » Please provide your feedback on the CPWG Charter and "Ideal" Process by commenting on the Google Doc here.

Note: Slide 8 to become a new CPWG resource (for print/distribution during ATLAS III and ICANN66).

...

6. Policy comment updates - Jonathan Zuck, Evin Erdoğdu and all (

...

30 minutes)

View file

name	190821 CPWG.pdf
height	250

Recently Ratified by the ALAC (including executive summaries)

...

Public Comment Name

Public Comment Close

Status

Penholder(s)

CPWG SubPro Comment

Ongoing Workspace

As per 17 July CPWG AI, this is an informal At-Large workspace on the topic.

COMMENT

TBD

As per 24 July CPWG AI, this is an informal At-Large workspace on the topic.

Status

colour	Yellow
title	DRAFTING

Olivier Crepin-Leblond

...

7. Any other business (AOB) - Olivier Crepin-Leblond and all (3 minutes)

...

8. Next Meeting(s) after Doodle Poll - Olivier Crepin-Leblond and staff (2 minutes)

Agenda - ES

1. Bienvenida y asistencia - staff (2 minutos)

2. Adopcion de la Agenda, revision de los Items de Accion 14 Agosto - Olivier Crepin-Leblond (3 minutos)

3. Actualización EPDP Fase II -

...

Alan Greenberg (15 minutos)

4. Actualizaciones de SubPro - Justine Chew (10 minutos)

...

View file

name	WT5 21 August 2019 v1.pdf
height	250

5

...

Encuesta GeoNames
En un intento por alejar la discusión de At-Large de los Nombres Geográficos de la retórica abstracta e identificar las prioridades y el potencial para el consenso, exploraremos una serie de escenarios que involucran posibles conflictos que rodean la aplicación para una cadena particular y resultados potenciales. Una vez que se desarrolle esta lista, la pondremos a disposición como una encuesta para que la mayor cantidad de individuos y organizaciones de At-large puedan evaluar.

View file

name	JZ - Geonames.pdf
height	250

...

. Carta del CPWG y proceso "ideal" - Jonathan Zuck y todos (

...

20 minutos)

View file

name	CPWG Charter & Process.pdf
height	250

...

» Por favor, envíe sus comentarios sobre la Carta del CPWG y el Proceso" Ideal "comentando el documento de Google aquí.

Nota: Diapositiva 8 para convertirse en un nuevo recurso CPWG (para impresión / distribución durante ATLAS III e ICANN66).

6. Actualizaciones de comentarios sobre políticas: Jonathan Zuck, Evin Erdoğdu y todos (30 minutos)

View file

name	190814 190821 CPWG.pdf
height	250

Recientemente Ratificados por el ALAC

Proposed Definition of Name Collisions and Scope of Inquiry for the Name Collisions Analysis Project
The ALAC considers the issue of Name Collision in the DNS an area of importance for the minimization of unintended consequences for Internet end users. The ALAC appreciates the need to have a Name Collision definition for purposes of scoping the inquiry for the Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP), in order for the NCAP Study One to be manageable and on point, and therefore supports the Proposed Definition of Name Collision and Scope of Inquiry for the Name Collision Analysis Project of 1 July 2019. Of particular importance to us are:

(1) The recognition and inclusion of Type B situations (ie. B. In scope but not intended to be the subject of data studies) which provides built-in peripheral consideration of such situations with decision for examination through data analysis at a later stage if a compelling case were to arise within Study One; and

(2) The possibility of amending the Definition of Name Collision and Scope of Inquiry for the Name Collision Analysis Project should further pertinent information come to light at a later stage either through the ongoing work of the NCAP DG, NCAP Working Party and/or input obtained from the party/ies eventually contracted to undertake NCAP Study One.

Evolving the Governance of the Root Server System
The ALAC strongly supports the overall proposal and appreciates the opportunity to comment. The RSS, according to RRSAC37, needs to evolve so it remains a reliable, resilient, and sustainable service in the face of increasing traffic and cyberattacks. However, the ALAC finds it difficult to accept that ICANN is not considered a primary stakeholder with regard to the RSS, given that the Domain Name System
Executive Summary TBDand its reliable and trusted operation is a prime reason for ICANN’s existence. The ALAC also encourages that Internet users, the ultimate user and beneficiary of the DNS, should be listed as having a stake in the existence and evolution of the RSS.

The financial model is also of some concern to the ALAC. No figures are provided to allow even order-of-magnitude estimates. It is surely time that we begin to understand exactly what level of funding will be required and hypothesize on where such funding will come from.

Draft Financial Assumptions & Projections and Operating Initiatives for the development of Fiscal Years 2021-2025 Operating & Financial Plan
Executive Summary TBDThe ALAC considered the Draft Financial Assumptions, Projections and Operating Initiatives, and offered comments on the following topics among others:

The ALAC is not optimistic that Financial Assumptions A (Roll-out of New gTLDs) and B (New Business Models – Geographic gTLDs and Brand gTLDs) will be highly successful vehicles to new revenue. Although the first round of new gTLDs did bring in considerable revenue, the ALAC notes that these earlier rounds represented the “low hanging fruit” in the new gTLD market.
The ALAC agrees that ICANN continue to put money towards the an urgent need to resolve current challenges around Universal Acceptance, as well as the primary strategic goal of security, stability and trust.
The ALAC agrees that work which needs to be done on evolving the multistakeholder system is substantial and complex and that it must be ongoing with adequate resources directed towards its completion. The objectives related to diverse and inclusive participation in policy making in an efficient and effective way are essential to improving the system, underlining that face-to-face meetings are essential to the functioning of the multistakeholder model.
The ALAC/At-Large community propose some clarity via a listing of priorities and statements on the impact of each project on ICANN org and on each of the unique ACs and SOs. The community believes that while policy development and implementation activities are integral to the planning process, so are other activities, such as those that enable communication, collaboration, and outreach, between RALOS, At-Large members and other constituencies.