AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
Page History
...
Action Items: EN
Chat: EN
...
Dial-out Participants
EN: Satish Babu, Maureen Hilyard, Holly Raiche, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Manju Chen, Ahmad Alsadeh, Yasuichi Kitamura, Ali AlMeshal, Aisyah Shakirah Suhaidi, Suhaidi Hassan, Amrita Choudhury, Tomohiro Fujisaki, Eranga Samararathna, Jahangir Hossain, Mili Semlani, Sneha Tambe, Gunela Astbrink, Cherie Lagakali, Justine Chew, Shreedeep Rayamajhi, Bikram Shrestha, Nadira AlAraj, Hana Khatib, Yeseul Kim, Jee Eun Choi, Winthrop Yu, Sherry Shek, Aris Ignacio, Prateek Pathak, Priyatosh Jana, William Tibben
ZH: None
Apologies: Lianna Galstyan, Fouad Bajwa
Staff: Silvia Vivanco, Yeşim Siranush Vardanyan, Yeşim Nazlar
ZH Interpreters: Ray & Sandy
Call Management: Yeşim Nazlar
...
2. Welcome and APRALO Membership Matters (Satish, 3 min)
Newly Certified |
None | None | |
Pending ALAC Vote | None | None |
Awaiting RALO Feedback (1) | None |
Namrata Khetrapal |
Processing Due Diligence |
None
Yatanar Htun - response pending from applicant
(2) | #301 Internet Governance Institute (awaiting applicant feedback) #299 China Internet Development Foundation (awaiting applicant feedback) | None |
On Hold (2) |
#267 Surabhi Softwares #112 Arab Regional ISPs & DSPs Association (ARISPA) | None |
3. At-Large Review Implementation/ARIWG: The Next Steps: Maureen/Cheryl (5 min)
...
See: 2019 ALAC Policy Comments & Advice (new)
See: 2018 ALAC Policy Comments & Advice
See: At-Large Policy Summary
See: At-Large Executive Summary page (new)
See: Multistakeholder Advice Development graphic
Advice (sent to ICANN Board): GNSO Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Policy Recommendations for ICANN Board Consideration
Summary TBD
Comment (sent to ICANN Board): ICANN64 Joint GAC-ALAC Statement on EPDP
During ICANN64, the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) and Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) drafted and approved a Joint GAC-ALAC Statement on the EPDP. The GAC and ALAC are aligned overall with the EPDP Phase I Report, as it pertains to outstanding concerns as articulated in their respective statements to the report. The two advisory committees are in agreement on the need to distinguish between natural and legal persons. In addition, the GAC and ALAC highlighted the importance of data accuracy, the technical contact field, and protecting the public interest. The statement was drafted jointly with the GAC with input from the ALAC Liaison to the GAC, Yrjö Lansipuro, and GAC representative, Cathrin Bauer-Bulst, as well as the At-Large representatives to the EPDP, Hadia Elminiawi and Alan Greenberg.
Comment: Proposed Renewal of .asia Registry Agreement
The ALAC supports the proposed changes to the .asia (DotAsia) renewal agreement, with (3) comments related to universal acceptance (UA), public interest commitments and fees to be paid to ICANN org.
Comment: ALAC Statement on Registry Agreement Renewals .org, .biz and .info
The ALAC generally refrained from commenting on these prior proposed Registry Agreement renewals, with the exception of the proposed renewal of the .NET Registry Agreement in 2017. The ALAC in general favors standardizing Registry Agreements as this allows for transparency and predictability, as well as ease of review and compliance monitoring of one standard contract (with necessary but controlled variations through Addendums) instead of managing many disparate/varying contracts. Being supportive of this approach, the ALAC has not objected to the base Registry Agreement, or to its use in prior renewals.
In respect of the intent to standardize the said 3 proposed Registry Agreement renewals (.org, .biz, .info), the ALAC welcomes the following proposals:
(i) inclusion of Public Interest Commitments (per Specification 11),
(ii) inclusion of Minimum requirements for Rights Protection Mechanisms (per Specification 7),
(iii) adoption of the Registry Code of Conduct (per Specification 9), and
(iv) amendment of the relevant section in Specification 5 to govern the allocation of two-character labels at the second level to avoid confusion with corresponding country codes.
The ALAC also noted there are differences in opinion within At-Large regarding the omission and quantum of price caps.
Public Comment for DecisionPublic Comment for Decision
None
Current Statements (ALAC Advice, Comment or Correspondence)
Public Comment Name | Public Comment Close | Status | Penholder(s) |
---|
|
DRAFTING |
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
*Please note during the 17 April CPWG call, Greg Shatan volunteered to be penholder for an ALAC statement on all 4 Registry Agreement PCs (deadline - 29 April).
5.APRALO Updates (12 min)
...
7. Member of the Month - Presentation (Lianna, Prateek/Sneha - ISOC Mumbai, 8 min)
8. NomCom Update (5 min) - Nadira Alaraj
9. Feedback request from NomCom Review Implementation Working Group (NomComRIWG) - Satish (2 mins)
10. AOB (5 3 min)