Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

  Terri Agnew:Dear all, Welcome to the At-Large Ad-hoc WG on the Transition of US Government Stewardship of the IANA Function Thursday, 12 March 2015 at 13:30 UTC

  Terri Agnew:meeting page: https://community.icann.org/x/mhAnAw

  Tijani BEN JEMAA:Hi Rerri

  Tijani BEN JEMAA:can u plz make Adigo call me

  Terri Agnew:Hi Tijan, yes, they will dial out to you

  Tijani BEN JEMAA:thx Terri

  Yasuichi Kitamura:Hi, all

  Leon Sanchez:Hello everyone

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Hi

  Terri Agnew:Please remember to mute your line when not speaking

  Terri Agnew:Action Items from the meeting of 05 March 2015: https://community.icann.org/x/KA4nAw

  Terri Agnew:IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group Issues Proposal Assembly and Finalization Process and Updated Transition Process Timeline:  https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2015-01-07-en

  Terri Agnew:IANA CWG Meeting #27(10 March): https://community.icann.org/x/RwsnAw

  Terri Agnew:IANA CWG Meeting #28 (12 March): https://community.icann.org/x/SgsnAw

  Terri Agnew:Design teams: https://community.icann.org/x/pAknAw

  Terri Agnew:DT-A Service Levels Expectations: https://community.icann.org/x/CA4nAw

  Terri Agnew:DT-B Assessment of the Level of Consensus within the ccTLD Community in Regard to a Possible Appeal Mechanism for ccTLD Delegations and Redelegations: https://community.icann.org/x/GhEnAw

  Terri Agnew:DT-C CSC: https://community.icann.org/x/HxEnAw

  Mohamed EL Bashir:the 2 received proposals are satisactoy and complete as per ICG RFP and NTIA requirements and the NTIA , the only issues which required requesting clarifications from the 2 communities is the issue of IANA IP/IANA.org domain rights which was covered in the protocol proposal ( which propsoed IETF Trust to manage those ), the numbers proposal did not mentioned this issue

  Danny Younger:I volunteered to join Team D

  Avri Doria:i have put myself forward for M, and am provisionally leading N

  Danny Younger:Noted.  Thanks for the invite.

  Terri Agnew:Welcome Glenn McKnight

  Glenn McKnight:Hi Danny  Haven't heard from you for a while

  Danny Younger:Hi Glenn.  Always watching, not always commenting.

  Avri Doria:i think they need to be subscribed particpants.

  Glenn McKnight:@ IGF USA  is being planned now  for Washington  on June 8th

  Terri Agnew:Welcome Carlton Samuels

  Carlton Samuels:Morning all. Hi Danny, good to see you here

  Danny Younger:Good Morning Carlton

  Glenn McKnight:@ Carelton hey bro

  Carlton Samuels:@Glenn:Howdy brotherman

  Avri Doria:At this point on Team N: Periodic Review of IANA Functions, just at the stage of defining the  completes the template with all of the minimum required information;  the template is in a drive document open to suggestions and comments <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pjRsvePXLHrK0zzFmMcavzvSXehds5FTCEUPPcc7K6w/edit?usp=sharing>

  Gordon Chillcott:Thank you, Eduardo

  Carlton Samuels:@Eduardo: Reasonable concern for sure. But the design team cannot start until they have a design brief for all the various pieces they are working on.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Correct @Avri

  Carlton Samuels:There could be multiple solutions out of design but what miust happen is tat every design will be presented for examination

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:it is focussed upon operational outcomes that are agnostic to the model choosen  so that this work is substantailkly done before things like Legal advice  etc., comes into play

  Carlton Samuels:@OCL: My intuit is that the choice in the end shall be informed by the design output itself since they will respond to very specific points in any proposal

  Carlton Samuels:@Tijani: He wants to know if the design output would influence the proposal chosen

  Carlton Samuels:@OCL: Design Teams are engaged in "Implementation Design"; meaning, how to operationalize a proposal.

  Carlton Samuels:It is the best way to decide what is fit to purpose!

  Carlton Samuels:@Tijani: Exactly! 3 different proposals and the question is IF we are to examine them dispassionately, which of these will A) Deliver the solution that is best for business B) Can be implementable in context of the end game defined by Uncle Sam/NTIA 

  Terri Agnew:Mohamed El Bashir confirmed he will not be able to rejoin today's meeting

  Gordon Chillcott:Thanks, Avri - your explanation makes me more comfortable.

  Terri Agnew:Client Committee: https://community.icann.org/x/8g8nAw

  Terri Agnew:Sidley Austin LLP: http://www.sidley.com/

  Terri Agnew:Client Committee Kick Off Call (9 March 2015): https://community.icann.org/x/hxAnAw

  Leon Sanchez:I am also signed up as an observer

  Carlton Samuels:@Legal Advice:  In these matters you look for what the instructions to counsel outline and how they communicate. The engagement letter - in my part of the world it's called a brief - is carefully drafted. Not a whole helluva lot to cavil now until we see what is operationalize.

  Carlton Samuels:@OCL: EXACTLY!  If you think any sensitive thing will be handled via email I have a bridge to sell you!  Connects the island of Manhattan to Brooklyn. Been in the family for quite a bit. :-)

  Carlton Samuels:I can't speak

  Carlton Samuels:Please read

  Carlton Samuels:@OCL: What needs to happen is a set of specific questions MUST be asked each time the lawyers are in earshot. Then you record the answers because the language chosen in answer will reveal a lot; what is routine, what is tricky, how much can be shared.

  Carlton Samuels:I hear a  baby gurgling...

  Leon Sanchez:not mine

  Carlton Samuels:LOL

  Terri Agnew:CCWG Accountability : https://community.icann.org/x/IIMHAw

  Carlton Samuels:@OCL: Its a joy to hear!  It makes me know I'm alive and well....so long as they go home at night

  Eduardo Diaz - (ALAC):I need to move away from the computer, Will be in audio only

  Terri Agnew:@Eduardo, thank you for the update

  Terri Agnew:Welcome Beran Gillen

  BERan Gillen:better late than never

  BERan Gillen:hello eveyrone

  Terri Agnew:@Tijani, your line is choppy

  Leon Sanchez:Tijanis audio is breaking

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:As should be expected with Stress Testing :-)

  Avri Doria (isoc-ny):one thought.  If we manage to create a community veto.  an the Board overrules it, that could be one enabler of a spill the board vote.  Another might be the refusal to go along with an IAP or IRP ruling.

  Avri Doria (isoc-ny):that is if i understood Tijani's request correctly.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Cant wait to see what you think is convenient for me @Leon ;-)

  Avri Doria (isoc-ny):i tought inidivudal impeachment was a WS2 issues. 

  Avri Doria (isoc-ny):i agree that there need to be objective triggers, and that was why i offfer 2 examples.

  Tijani BEN JEMAA:Avri, can we plz work together to set some objective standards

  Gordon Chillcott:This time works for me

  Danny Younger:OK

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Good Call ... Thanks all... Talk again soon...

  Gordon Chillcott:Thanks and bye for now.

  Leon Sanchez:Thanks everyone!