AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
Page History
Terri Agnew:Dear all, Welcome to the At-Large Ad-hoc WG on the Transition of US Government Stewardship of the IANA Function Thursday, 12 March 2015 at 13:30 UTC
Terri Agnew:meeting page: https://community.icann.org/x/mhAnAw
Tijani BEN JEMAA:Hi Rerri
Tijani BEN JEMAA:can u plz make Adigo call me
Terri Agnew:Hi Tijan, yes, they will dial out to you
Tijani BEN JEMAA:thx Terri
Yasuichi Kitamura:Hi, all
Leon Sanchez:Hello everyone
Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Hi
Terri Agnew:Please remember to mute your line when not speaking
Terri Agnew:Action Items from the meeting of 05 March 2015: https://community.icann.org/x/KA4nAw
Terri Agnew:IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group Issues Proposal Assembly and Finalization Process and Updated Transition Process Timeline: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2015-01-07-en
Terri Agnew:IANA CWG Meeting #27(10 March): https://community.icann.org/x/RwsnAw
Terri Agnew:IANA CWG Meeting #28 (12 March): https://community.icann.org/x/SgsnAw
Terri Agnew:Design teams: https://community.icann.org/x/pAknAw
Terri Agnew:DT-A Service Levels Expectations: https://community.icann.org/x/CA4nAw
Terri Agnew:DT-B Assessment of the Level of Consensus within the ccTLD Community in Regard to a Possible Appeal Mechanism for ccTLD Delegations and Redelegations: https://community.icann.org/x/GhEnAw
Terri Agnew:DT-C CSC: https://community.icann.org/x/HxEnAw
Mohamed EL Bashir:the 2 received proposals are satisactoy and complete as per ICG RFP and NTIA requirements and the NTIA , the only issues which required requesting clarifications from the 2 communities is the issue of IANA IP/IANA.org domain rights which was covered in the protocol proposal ( which propsoed IETF Trust to manage those ), the numbers proposal did not mentioned this issue
Danny Younger:I volunteered to join Team D
Avri Doria:i have put myself forward for M, and am provisionally leading N
Danny Younger:Noted. Thanks for the invite.
Terri Agnew:Welcome Glenn McKnight
Glenn McKnight:Hi Danny Haven't heard from you for a while
Danny Younger:Hi Glenn. Always watching, not always commenting.
Avri Doria:i think they need to be subscribed particpants.
Glenn McKnight:@ IGF USA is being planned now for Washington on June 8th
Terri Agnew:Welcome Carlton Samuels
Carlton Samuels:Morning all. Hi Danny, good to see you here
Danny Younger:Good Morning Carlton
Glenn McKnight:@ Carelton hey bro
Carlton Samuels:@Glenn:Howdy brotherman
Avri Doria:At this point on Team N: Periodic Review of IANA Functions, just at the stage of defining the completes the template with all of the minimum required information; the template is in a drive document open to suggestions and comments <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pjRsvePXLHrK0zzFmMcavzvSXehds5FTCEUPPcc7K6w/edit?usp=sharing>
Gordon Chillcott:Thank you, Eduardo
Carlton Samuels:@Eduardo: Reasonable concern for sure. But the design team cannot start until they have a design brief for all the various pieces they are working on.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Correct @Avri
Carlton Samuels:There could be multiple solutions out of design but what miust happen is tat every design will be presented for examination
Cheryl Langdon-Orr:it is focussed upon operational outcomes that are agnostic to the model choosen so that this work is substantailkly done before things like Legal advice etc., comes into play
Carlton Samuels:@OCL: My intuit is that the choice in the end shall be informed by the design output itself since they will respond to very specific points in any proposal
Carlton Samuels:@Tijani: He wants to know if the design output would influence the proposal chosen
Carlton Samuels:@OCL: Design Teams are engaged in "Implementation Design"; meaning, how to operationalize a proposal.
Carlton Samuels:It is the best way to decide what is fit to purpose!
Carlton Samuels:@Tijani: Exactly! 3 different proposals and the question is IF we are to examine them dispassionately, which of these will A) Deliver the solution that is best for business B) Can be implementable in context of the end game defined by Uncle Sam/NTIA
Terri Agnew:Mohamed El Bashir confirmed he will not be able to rejoin today's meeting
Gordon Chillcott:Thanks, Avri - your explanation makes me more comfortable.
Terri Agnew:Client Committee: https://community.icann.org/x/8g8nAw
Terri Agnew:Sidley Austin LLP: http://www.sidley.com/
Terri Agnew:Client Committee Kick Off Call (9 March 2015): https://community.icann.org/x/hxAnAw
Leon Sanchez:I am also signed up as an observer
Carlton Samuels:@Legal Advice: In these matters you look for what the instructions to counsel outline and how they communicate. The engagement letter - in my part of the world it's called a brief - is carefully drafted. Not a whole helluva lot to cavil now until we see what is operationalize.
Carlton Samuels:@OCL: EXACTLY! If you think any sensitive thing will be handled via email I have a bridge to sell you! Connects the island of Manhattan to Brooklyn. Been in the family for quite a bit. :-)
Carlton Samuels:I can't speak
Carlton Samuels:Please read
Carlton Samuels:@OCL: What needs to happen is a set of specific questions MUST be asked each time the lawyers are in earshot. Then you record the answers because the language chosen in answer will reveal a lot; what is routine, what is tricky, how much can be shared.
Carlton Samuels:I hear a baby gurgling...
Leon Sanchez:not mine
Carlton Samuels:LOL
Terri Agnew:CCWG Accountability : https://community.icann.org/x/IIMHAw
Carlton Samuels:@OCL: Its a joy to hear! It makes me know I'm alive and well....so long as they go home at night
Eduardo Diaz - (ALAC):I need to move away from the computer, Will be in audio only
Terri Agnew:@Eduardo, thank you for the update
Terri Agnew:Welcome Beran Gillen
BERan Gillen:better late than never
BERan Gillen:hello eveyrone
Terri Agnew:@Tijani, your line is choppy
Leon Sanchez:Tijanis audio is breaking
Cheryl Langdon-Orr:As should be expected with Stress Testing :-)
Avri Doria (isoc-ny):one thought. If we manage to create a community veto. an the Board overrules it, that could be one enabler of a spill the board vote. Another might be the refusal to go along with an IAP or IRP ruling.
Avri Doria (isoc-ny):that is if i understood Tijani's request correctly.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Cant wait to see what you think is convenient for me @Leon ;-)
Avri Doria (isoc-ny):i tought inidivudal impeachment was a WS2 issues.
Avri Doria (isoc-ny):i agree that there need to be objective triggers, and that was why i offfer 2 examples.
Tijani BEN JEMAA:Avri, can we plz work together to set some objective standards
Gordon Chillcott:This time works for me
Danny Younger:OK
Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Good Call ... Thanks all... Talk again soon...
Gordon Chillcott:Thanks and bye for now.
Leon Sanchez:Thanks everyone!