Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

• Less relevant,

• Not  Helpful

 

2 . Please  self-identify all  categories  that describes  who you are

  • A person with  disabilities,
  • Participant for whom English  is a second language,
  • Participant who  doesn't speak English 
  • Participant who has limited  or low bandwidth
  • None of the above

 

3  3 . What  benefits  did you get from accessing the  Captioning stream? Chose as many answers as possible

...

•Provided the correct spelling of technical terminology•Personal benefits of being appreciated

•Able to more fully participate and engage with the presenter

• other, please describe   Leave this blank so people can add to it.

 

4.  Where else do you think Captioning should be required?

Working Groups, Task Forces, Adhoc groups, RALO Calls, ALAC Calls, CCWG Calls, other constituencies

 

5  Any final comments?

 

**Section two:

When the captioning is part of a webinar than ask these additional questions

6. How do you  rank today's session in terms of  quality of information 1 to 5 ( Five is the best) Chose one answer

7. How was all the presenter's  delivery  1 to 5 ( Five is the best)

8. Do you plan on using any of  information directly with your  AT Large Structure (ALS)?  yes or no

9. If yes,  please explain

10. Any further comments/recommendations about the content of this session?

 

Phase  Two:  List of   Groups (Limit 6)

  • LACRALO
  • Euralo EURALO
  • AFRALO 
  • Session of the Accountability Diversity Stream
  • APRALO on CCWG/IANA