Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

00:18:12    Steinar Grøtterød (At-Large):    URL for the ICANN announcement?
00:18:40    Steinar Grøtterød (At-Large):    thx
00:18:42    Jonathan Zuck:    domainincite.com
00:21:00    Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org:    Letter from Tripti: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/sinha-to-zuck-22may23-en.pdf
00:21:10    Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org:    Should that be displayed?
00:21:29    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    Cheryl we can’t hear you
00:21:32    Cheryl Langdon-Orr:    Back to you
00:21:36    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    We’ll wait for you to get settled
00:22:21    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    Thanks Bill, that might be a place to start?
00:23:51    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    CCTRT Rec #18
00:24:04    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    “In order for the upcoming WHOIS Review Team to determine whether additional steps are needed to improve WHOIS accuracy, and whether to proceed with the identity phase of the Accuracy Reporting System (ARS) project, ICANN should gather data to assess whether a significant percentage of WHOISrelated complaints applicable to new gTLDs relate to the accuracy of the identity of the registrant.30 This should include analysis of WHOIS accuracy complaints received by ICANN Contractual Compliance to identify the subject matter of the complaints (e.g., complaints about syntax, operability, or identity). The volume of these complaints between legacy gTLDs and new gTLDs should also be compared. ICANN should also identify other potential data sources of WHOIS complaints beyond those that are contractually required (including but not limited to complaints received directly by registrars, registries, ISPs, etc.) and attempt to obtain anonymized data from these sources. Future CCT Reviews may then also use these data.”
00:24:56    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    @Cheryl, it’s CCTRT Rec #18
00:37:13    Justine Chew:    Could this be one of those tagged as completed but not really?
00:37:37    Justine Chew:    We have had a few of those.
00:40:04    Bill Jouris:    A seriously frail reed, that's me!
00:41:46    Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org:    
00:41:52    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    Wow!
00:42:12    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    AOB— next week, this call will be used for ICANN77 prep
00:42:26    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    Perfect, thank you. Susie and I were wondering
00:43:00    Justine Chew:    Yes linked in xls
00:44:08    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    Item 3. For those listening, the Board-GNSO Council SubPro update call was held on Mon 22 May. URL is in agenda, also here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=240617931
00:44:09    Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org:    The link is above
00:44:23    Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org:    Would you like that to be displayed?
00:44:35    Heidi Ullrich - ICANN Org:    ok
00:45:00    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    Justine, can resend Trip’s letter so it’s at the top of your inbox
00:46:32    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    ALAC advice is included, we were requested to do so
00:46:39    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    Even this one
00:48:26    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    And is it relevant now? Maybe worth considering Board’s letter and if worth sending new advice?
00:48:54    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    The Board’s letter seems to determine the ALAC Advice on SubPro as closed
00:51:38    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    Great, thank you
00:53:51    Chantelle Doerksen - ICANN Org:    Let’s stop the recording