Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Notes:

  • As this page is public, the applicant's personally identifiable information has not been included.
  • There are several instances of ALS applicants not responding to requests for additional feedback, in which case their applications are usually put on hold, rather than formally rejected.

Formal rejections either by RALO or ALAC:

AFRALO

  • Organization/applicant was not legitimately incorporated (either not incorporated as stated, or attempted to use name/identity of existing organization/ALS).
  • Organization structure/mission not compatible with being an ALS (not formed in the interest of end users, i.e. government or corporate entity).

APRALO

  • APRALO recommended applicant withdraw and apply to NPOC. 

EURALO

  • Organization/applicant was not legitimately incorporated (either not incorporated as stated, or attempted to use name/identity of existing organization/ALS)..
  • Organization structure/mission not compatible with being an ALS (not formed in the interest of end users, i.e. government or corporate entity).

LACRALO

  • Unknown - likely organization was not legitimately incorporated (either not incorporated as stated, or attempted to use name/identity of existing organization/ALS).

NARALO

  • Spam application/organization/applicant was not legitimately incorporated (either not incorporated as stated, or attempted to use name/identity of existing organization/ALS).