Page History

08:38:33 From Claudia Ruiz : Welcome to the ALS Mobilization Working Party Call
09:00:47 From Amrita : J
09:00:50 From Amrita : N
09:00:56 From Amrita : hi all
09:01:17 From Daniel K. Nanghaka : Hi All
09:01:51 From Nadira Al Araj : As a chair it is good enough for NARALO ;)
09:01:51 From ali almeshal : hi all
09:06:38 From Claudia Ruiz : I will update it now
09:06:39 From Alan Greenberg : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AbnUYYsKGNSlccuO3TpDZGSx6aA2HoKwoTA7qZBnewY/edit
09:06:49 From Alperen Eken : I will update the agenda now
09:07:58 From Filina Natalia : hi all!
09:10:31 From Heidi Ullrich : Action Items will be posted at: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Action+Items%3A+2020-02-19+ALS+Mobilization+Working+Party+Call
09:11:41 From Barrack Otieno : i agree with Alan
09:11:45 From Amrita : but should have some link to ICT or IF
09:11:52 From Amrita : iG
09:11:54 From silvia.vivanco : @Alan , what about “are encouraged” to become active
09:12:34 From Dev Anand Teelucksingh : Think @silvia's wording could also work
09:13:14 From Dev Anand Teelucksingh : Alan wording works, but Silvia's also works
09:14:47 From ali almeshal : Agree with Alan
09:15:13 From ali almeshal : No
09:15:31 From ali almeshal : Should consider whether
09:15:47 From ali almeshal : I agree to current wording
09:18:12 From Amrita : w
09:19:07 From Justine Chew : "could consider"?
09:19:27 From Amrita : +1 justine
09:19:37 From ali almeshal : @slivia , but the wording says “Should come with whether”
09:19:39 From Amrita : or "may consider"
09:20:07 From Nadira Al Araj : +1 Justine and Amrita
09:20:12 From Justine Chew : ".. could consider becoming active ...."
09:20:20 From silvia.vivanco : But even “should consider”creates an obligation to consider
09:20:35 From silvia.vivanco : so…”encourage to consider” is better
09:21:36 From silvia.vivanco : “should” is stronger than “encourage”
09:21:55 From Heidi Ullrich : Will becoming active in IG issues help them in representing individual end users best interests in ICANN?
09:22:17 From Dev Anand Teelucksingh : well the next sentence "Such activities are complementary..." explains the reason why ALS are encourage to consider...
09:22:24 From Dev Anand Teelucksingh : as per Silvia's suggestion
09:26:55 From silvia.vivanco : they have rules but they have not been proactively enforcing them
09:27:14 From silvia.vivanco : Other than checking attendance records
09:28:39 From Nadira Al Araj : And response to surveys
09:29:54 From Heidi Ullrich : As a group
09:29:58 From Heidi Ullrich : not an group
09:30:05 From Nadira Al Araj : Yes it is good point
09:30:37 From Heidi Ullrich : Thanks, Yrjo :)
09:31:00 From Yrjo Lansipuro : You’re welcome Heidi
09:32:17 From Heidi Ullrich : @Alan, would these ALS additional expectations need RALO Bylaw changes?
09:32:39 From Heidi Ullrich : Additional expectations would impact all existing ALSes
09:32:54 From Heidi Ullrich : so they should have a vote on these changes
09:33:42 From Filina Natalia : @Heidi, only Operational Rules maybe?
09:40:01 From ali almeshal : no
09:41:46 From ali almeshal : +silent
09:43:11 From Dev Anand Teelucksingh : very well
09:43:14 From Nadira Al Araj : Agree
09:43:22 From ali almeshal : yes
09:43:30 From Barrack Otieno : yeah
09:49:13 From Amrita : ok
09:49:25 From Justine Chew : Can we say "Be self-funded" instead of "Be self-supporting"?
09:50:00 From Heidi Ullrich : Do we expect ALSes to become more global in the future?
09:50:54 From Dev Anand Teelucksingh : why though ?
09:51:02 From Dev Anand Teelucksingh : is there a difference ?
09:51:29 From Amrita : agree with Justine
09:51:30 From Filina Natalia : agree with Justine
09:51:46 From Nadira Al Araj : +1 Justine
09:53:01 From Dev Anand Teelucksingh : Yes to Alan
09:54:33 From Filina Natalia : 3 better, agree
09:54:40 From Nadira Al Araj : 3
09:54:45 From ali almeshal : 2
09:54:54 From Nadira Al Araj : leave it optional
09:55:11 From ali almeshal : yes
09:55:12 From Dev Anand Teelucksingh : yes
09:55:23 From Amrita : agree wiy
09:55:31 From Amrita : with nadira
09:56:05 From Dev Anand Teelucksingh : Well
09:58:05 From Seun Ojedeji : @Staff i am supposed to be at the AFRALO meeting the url shared is taking me here
09:58:13 From Seun Ojedeji : AFRALO ROP WG
09:59:07 From Filina Natalia : Number and size do not always correlate with participation activity. Doesn`t matter if more than 2 maybe?
09:59:11 From Filina Natalia : -)
10:00:01 From Nadira Al Araj : exactly they can be individual members
10:00:18 From Dev Anand Teelucksingh : correct Alan
10:00:22 From ali almeshal : same as ISOC you should have minimum number to be ISOC
10:00:26 From Filina Natalia : yes, agree, Alan. And +1 Nadira
10:00:35 From Amrita : thanks Alan
10:00:40 From ali almeshal : thank you
10:00:43 From Amrita : bye all
10:00:43 From Dev Anand Teelucksingh : thanks Alan, all - take care all