Zoom Chat: 2021-08-12 ICANN72 Planning Committee

13:00:25 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Greetings, people of Earth!
13:02:02 From Dave Kissoondoyal to Everyone:
Hello everyone
13:02:51 From Raymond Mamattah to Everyone:
Hi everyone, good evening from Accra, Ghana
13:04:31 From Adrian to Everyone:
Hi from sunny Alberta, Canada
13:05:26 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
Hi Adrian. Nice to see you hear.
13:05:39 From Adrian to Everyone:
same!
13:11:41 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
I don't think that anyone was against the session probably because it had Avri introducing it
13:13:10 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Sorry to hear your not feeling well (if I got that correct) so prey tell why was SeB at the planning meeting sure he put in a proposal for a topic but is it not normally ALAC leads that go to these??
13:13:42 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
Why was this session labelled as EURALO when it was passed from this session.
13:14:04 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
I would have though ALL these topics including the listed one from EURALO would go via ALAC leads/reps equally lanbelled
13:14:13 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
not as a RALO one
13:14:14 From Sarah Kiden to Everyone:
I was wondering too. Because last time we agreed to submit as ALAC
13:14:16 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
The planning session involves our VCs and Regional Leaders but sessions to the Plenary should come from this meeting
13:15:37 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Ok if he was presenting as Regional Lead ( I am out of touch as I usually hear of Maureen and the VC's attending not the RALAO's soryy,
13:20:24 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Meetings are dying, that’s why. I think there’s a push from the CPH, to not even have 3 plenaries
13:21:02 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Noted @JZ
13:22:30 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
4 is fine
13:22:49 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Even though it is an AGM 4 would be better for those of us with poorr time zones
13:22:54 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
I am guessing 4 is preferablw
13:23:10 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
+1 Cheryl
13:23:10 From Sarah Kiden to Everyone:
I agree with 4 too
13:27:28 From Yrjo Lansipuro to Everyone:
@JZ +1
13:27:46 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
Another topic for a public discussion at a later time?
13:28:01 From Sarah Kiden to Everyone:
Yes @Marita
13:28:49 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
virtual meeting fatique
13:29:01 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
Exactly
13:29:18 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
an we do get to party a bit! here we just work
13:29:31 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
+1 Maureen
13:30:18 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Yes, Marita! Meetings use to be the time we tried to push things over the finish line and now they’re just more of the same. The most recent meeting as almost identical to the first virtual meeting. It’s a bit of a joke.
13:30:39 From Yrjo Lansipuro to Everyone:
Without f2f interaction, it’s like machinery slowly grinding to a halt due to lack of oil
13:30:57 From Maureen Hilyard to Everyone:
+1 Yrjo
13:31:09 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
But the virtual nature of this meeting and hybrid in future is a hard factor that is not dependent on ICANN or our choice and just going beck to F2F for those who could not travel is just as hard even if not harder... thises are exceptional times re meetings.
13:31:26 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
And the spirit of cooperation, to the extent it existed, is almost extinguished, over the past year.
13:32:16 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
undertood @JZ but causel factors and ability to change matters are not simply aligned
13:32:49 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
It might be that we suggest NOT having another virtual meeting but just postpone. We can always schedule cross community discussions, if we want to have them, but if we’re not really going to try any harder to make the virtual meetings “special,” perhaps we should pause them.
13:33:01 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
That makes sense G
13:34:59 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
Much as we would like to, we can't change the situation. But is interesting to observe the impacts over time. We did know there had to be some loss of energy
13:35:39 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
yes especially topic 5 (based on our recent discussion here) but the equity and engagement in Hybrid planning will indeed be a challenge IMO
13:39:00 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
AGree on focus for higher level (again AGM style) agregati9on of meetings in that week @Maireen
13:39:38 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Intersessionals included of course
13:39:45 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
@heidi @gisella what is happening about RTT in the other languages
13:40:32 From Judith Hellerstein to Everyone:
Can we use these during intersessional weeks
13:40:36 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
However Board and ALAC/At-Large might be harder to do in that week because fo their own Board sessions but we could perhaps try for that as well
13:44:50 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
I will need to leave just before top of hour as I have back to back calls and I co-chair the next one...
13:45:49 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Don’t see him
13:46:26 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
We need to avoid all overlaps where possible but the Regional input on planning needs to come into this meeting fairly urgently
13:47:17 From Sarah Kiden to Everyone:
:-)
13:47:17 From Sébastien Bachollet to Everyone:
I ;)
13:54:46 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
INdeed it is not meant to be onerous
13:54:54 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
I don't have 5 mins
13:55:14 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
We can do a SM poll to the list
13:55:23 From Dave Kissoondoyal to Everyone:
+1
13:55:38 From Sarah Kiden to Everyone:
Thank you!
13:55:38 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Yes
13:55:42 From Jonathan Zuck to Everyone:
Thanks!
13:55:44 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr to Everyone:
Bye for now
13:55:47 From Dave Kissoondoyal to Everyone:
Thanks and bye to all
13:55:51 From Marita Moll to Everyone:
Thanks. Bye