NARALO 'Brainstorm' on the Development of a Procedure to Select the At-Large a member of the ICANN Board, 21 September 2009
By consensus, meeting participants reached general agreement on a preferred method for choosing a Board member, though some issues were still open to variations:
Step |
Description |
Notes |
1 |
At-Large selects members for an ALAC Board Selection Working Group (BSWG) |
|
2 |
BSWG is tasked with creating a list of candidates, which is made public |
|
3 |
RALOs may add (a limited number of) candidates to the list supplied by the BSWG |
|
4 |
RALOs to reduce and/or order the preliminary list of candidates, and forward the result to ALAC. |
|
5a |
*Option 1:*ALAC elects a Board member from the final candidate list |
|
5b |
*Option 2:*RALOs elect a Board member from the final candidate list |
|
5c |
*Option 3:*ALAC reps and RALO chairs elect a Board member from the final candidate list |
|
5d |
*Option 4:*All partipating ALSs and individual members cast votes. |
|
5e |
*Option 5:*All individuals who express interest as individual Internet users cast votes |
|
5f |
*Option 6:*Each ALS casts one vote |
|
Click here for complete details of the NARALO Brainstorm.
I would like to support Evan's Option 3: ALAC reps and RALO chairs elect a Board member from the final candidate list (as a "directed vote" by the preference of each region).
Wolf Ludwig, EURALO
contributed by guest@socialtext.net on 2009-09-26 13:54:55 GMT
Option 5d: All partipating ALSs and individual members cast votes.
Option 5e: All individuals who express interest as individual Internet users cast votes.
I prefer 5e
--Wendy
contributed by guest@socialtext.net on 2009-10-08 19:46:56 GMT