This workspace has been made available for community members to post their Board related questions. The deadline for posting questions/comments to this workspace will be 28 February 2014 23:59 UTC.
AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
ALAC Liaisons and Representatives
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
This workspace has been made available for community members to post their Board related questions. The deadline for posting questions/comments to this workspace will be 28 February 2014 23:59 UTC.
1 Comment
Alan Greenberg
The ALAC has supported the Policy Advisory Board model to ensure that PICS are meaningful.
Although we still strongly advocate it, if the Board chooses not to implement such a mandatory system, how will it make PICs meaningful?
In particular, will it disallow PICs which give the registry the unilateral right to change the PIC, and will it announce and document mechanisms by which the PIC can be enforced other than through the PICDRP. It is acceptable that ICANN does not monitor PIC adherence, but it must commit to enforcing adherence when violations are identified.