The call for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Group A will take place on Thursday, 28 February 2019 at 20:00 UTC for 60 minutes.

12:00 PST, 15:00 EST, 21:00 Paris CET, (Friday) 01:00 Karachi PKT, (Friday) 05:00 Tokyo JST, (Friday) 07:00 Melbourne AEDT

For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y7kzansn

PROPOSED AGENDA


  1. Agenda review/SOIs
  2. Discussion of Public Comments: 2.4.3: Systems
  3. AOB

    

For agenda items 2-4 please find the relevant public comment review document:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15zDdzlBwLCz5m2sNXui6N6pporbUq-lDFEwfh4rKi4A/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

  

 BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS



RECORDINGS


Mp3

AC Recording

GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar

PARTICIPATION


Attendance & AC Chat

Apologies: none

Notes/ Action Items


Actions:

2.4.3.c.15, Business Constituency, line 86 -- request for clarification as to whether they would support with concerns if there was a way to mitigate the issue to which they object.

 

Notes:

 

1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): No updates provided.

 

2. Discussion of Public Comments: 2.4.3: Systems

 

2.4.3.c.1:

Lines 4-8, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement

Lines

 

2.4.3.c.2:

Lines 10-14, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement (as long as it will not cause undue delay -- Neustar)

 

2.4.3.c.3:

Lines 16-20, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement (as long as it will not cause undue delay -- Neustar)

 

2.4.3.c.4:

Lines 22-26, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, LEMARIT, Neustar, FairWind Partners -- Agreement

Line 27, ICANN Org -- New Idea

 

2.4.3.c.5:

Lines 30-31, BRG and BC -- Agreement

 

2.4.3.c.6:

Lines 33-37, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement (though it should not cause undue delay - Neustar)

 

2.4.3.c.7:

Lines 39-41, Brand Registry Group, Neustar, LEMARIT -- Agreement

Line 42, Business Constituency -- Agreement New Idea

 

2.4.3.c.8:

Lines 44-48, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement (though it should not cause undue delay - Neustar)

 

From the chat:

Steve Chan: So yeah, c.8 was not specifically mentioned in the ICANN org comment

Steve Chan: FWIW, I think perhaps why ICANN org did not tag c.8 is because the phone/chat assistance is for the technical system issues, not substantive questions about the criteria for instance.

 

2.4.3.c.9:

Line 50, BRG -- Agreement (but qualified support)

Line 51, Business Constituency -- Agreement

Line 52, Neustar -- Agreement (though it should not cause undue delay)

Line 53, LEMARIT -- Agreement

Line 54, ICANN Org -- Concerns

 

2.4.3.c.10:

Lines 56-59, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, LEMARIT -- Agreement (but should not cause undue delay - Neustar)

 

From the chat:

Steve Chan: I think the system already did send automated noticesin many instances. It might be helpful to be more specific where this is needed.

 

2.4.3.c.11:

Lines 61-64, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, LEMARIT -- Agreement (but should not cause undue delay - Neustar)

 

2.4.3.c.12:

Line 66-69, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, LEMARIT -- Agreement (but should not cause undue delay - Neustar)

Line 70, ICANN Org -- Concerns

 

2.4.3.c.13:

Lines 72-76, Brand Registry Group, Business, Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT --  Agreement (but should not cause undue delay - Neustar)

 

2.4.3.c.14:

Lines 78-82, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement (but should not cause undue delay - Neustar)

Line 83, ICANN Org -- Concerns

 

2.4.3.c.15:

Line 85, BRG -- Agreement

Line 86, Business Constituency -- Divergence

 

From the chat:

Steve Chan: It seems the BC is reacting to the last sentence of the implementation guidance of c.15 and is apposed to it.

 

Lines 87-88, Neustar and LEMARIT -- Agreement (though it should not cause undue delay - Neustar)

Line 89, ICANN Org -- Concerns

Line 90, Business Constituency -- Divergence (duplicates line 86)

 

From the chat:

Steve Chan: It seems the BC is reacting to the last sentence of the implementation guidance of c.15 and is apposed to it.

 

2.4.3.c.16:

Lines 92-94, Brand Registry Group, Neustar, LEMARIT -- Agreement (though it should not cause undue delay - Neustar)

Lines 95-96, Business Constituency, ICANN Org -- New Ideas -- might be divergence -- disagreement to providing contacts within the organization.

 

Other Comments:

Line 98, RrSG -- New Idea

 

3. Sub Group Comment Summaries

 

-- Section summaries in each tab.

-- Theme in questions/comments -- such as new ideas, divergence, concerns.

-- Cover in the next WG meeting.

Example: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MQmo1B6zBqGXYFRF2pKZXPhGmz0JfZhIaMxKIdVsT1g/edit#gid=110404450

 

  • No labels