The call for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Group A will take place on Thursday, 28 February 2019 at 20:00 UTC for 60 minutes.
12:00 PST, 15:00 EST, 21:00 Paris CET, (Friday) 01:00 Karachi PKT, (Friday) 05:00 Tokyo JST, (Friday) 07:00 Melbourne AEDT
For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y7kzansn
PROPOSED AGENDA
- Agenda review/SOIs
- Discussion of Public Comments: 2.4.3: Systems
- AOB
For agenda items 2-4 please find the relevant public comment review document:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15zDdzlBwLCz5m2sNXui6N6pporbUq-lDFEwfh4rKi4A/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com].
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS
RECORDINGS
PARTICIPATION
Notes/ Action Items
Actions:
2.4.3.c.15, Business Constituency, line 86 -- request for clarification as to whether they would support with concerns if there was a way to mitigate the issue to which they object.
Notes:
1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): No updates provided.
2. Discussion of Public Comments: 2.4.3: Systems
2.4.3.c.1:
Lines 4-8, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement
Lines
2.4.3.c.2:
Lines 10-14, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement (as long as it will not cause undue delay -- Neustar)
2.4.3.c.3:
Lines 16-20, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement (as long as it will not cause undue delay -- Neustar)
2.4.3.c.4:
Lines 22-26, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, LEMARIT, Neustar, FairWind Partners -- Agreement
Line 27, ICANN Org -- New Idea
2.4.3.c.5:
Lines 30-31, BRG and BC -- Agreement
2.4.3.c.6:
Lines 33-37, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement (though it should not cause undue delay - Neustar)
2.4.3.c.7:
Lines 39-41, Brand Registry Group, Neustar, LEMARIT -- Agreement
Line 42, Business Constituency -- Agreement New Idea
2.4.3.c.8:
Lines 44-48, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement (though it should not cause undue delay - Neustar)
From the chat:
Steve Chan: So yeah, c.8 was not specifically mentioned in the ICANN org comment
Steve Chan: FWIW, I think perhaps why ICANN org did not tag c.8 is because the phone/chat assistance is for the technical system issues, not substantive questions about the criteria for instance.
2.4.3.c.9:
Line 50, BRG -- Agreement (but qualified support)
Line 51, Business Constituency -- Agreement
Line 52, Neustar -- Agreement (though it should not cause undue delay)
Line 53, LEMARIT -- Agreement
Line 54, ICANN Org -- Concerns
2.4.3.c.10:
Lines 56-59, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, LEMARIT -- Agreement (but should not cause undue delay - Neustar)
From the chat:
Steve Chan: I think the system already did send automated noticesin many instances. It might be helpful to be more specific where this is needed.
2.4.3.c.11:
Lines 61-64, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, LEMARIT -- Agreement (but should not cause undue delay - Neustar)
2.4.3.c.12:
Line 66-69, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, LEMARIT -- Agreement (but should not cause undue delay - Neustar)
Line 70, ICANN Org -- Concerns
2.4.3.c.13:
Lines 72-76, Brand Registry Group, Business, Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement (but should not cause undue delay - Neustar)
2.4.3.c.14:
Lines 78-82, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement (but should not cause undue delay - Neustar)
Line 83, ICANN Org -- Concerns
2.4.3.c.15:
Line 85, BRG -- Agreement
Line 86, Business Constituency -- Divergence
From the chat:
Steve Chan: It seems the BC is reacting to the last sentence of the implementation guidance of c.15 and is apposed to it.
Lines 87-88, Neustar and LEMARIT -- Agreement (though it should not cause undue delay - Neustar)
Line 89, ICANN Org -- Concerns
Line 90, Business Constituency -- Divergence (duplicates line 86)
From the chat:
Steve Chan: It seems the BC is reacting to the last sentence of the implementation guidance of c.15 and is apposed to it.
2.4.3.c.16:
Lines 92-94, Brand Registry Group, Neustar, LEMARIT -- Agreement (though it should not cause undue delay - Neustar)
Lines 95-96, Business Constituency, ICANN Org -- New Ideas -- might be divergence -- disagreement to providing contacts within the organization.
Other Comments:
Line 98, RrSG -- New Idea
3. Sub Group Comment Summaries
-- Section summaries in each tab.
-- Theme in questions/comments -- such as new ideas, divergence, concerns.
-- Cover in the next WG meeting.