00:21:30 Claudia Ruiz ICANN Org: Welcome Steve Crocker to the call
00:22:03 Carlos Dionisio Aguirre: could the staff conect me to the spanish chanel
00:22:22 Carlos Dionisio Aguirre: my number +54 9 3515526909
00:23:00 Carlos Dionisio Aguirre: si Claudia por favor . gracias
00:23:53 Claudia Ruiz ICANN Org: Please send private chat to staff if you need a dial out in Spanish or French, thank you!
00:25:22 Jeff Bedser: sorry for delayed arrival!
00:26:13 Kathy Schnitt -ICANN Org: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1d35edo6FA7FJIFopGdhIfhMS4OXuiphw9qvU8KPCTMk/edit#slide=id.gf31bf3c230_4_75
00:26:16 Kathy Schnitt -ICANN Org: Here Steve
00:28:03 hadia Elminiawi: Hi tara
00:28:18 hadia Elminiawi: Tara
00:28:25 Tara Whalen: Hullo all!
00:41:27 Alan Greenberg: Current practice is a web form (typically with little functionality).
00:41:35 Sivasubramanian M: <question> Would it make it more complex for SSAC to examine if Registrants typically link their primary email address, or a relatively insignificant email address that is infrequently accessed by the Registrant? A
00:41:56 Alan Greenberg: Objection to e-mail is spam.
00:43:00 Sivasubramanian M: Another aspect of the email address is the 'quality' of the email address furnished by the Registrant.. Some email addresses are relatively authentic while there are also possibilities of the Registrant using an email addres provided by an email service that doewn't quite insist on aauthentication by the email user
00:43:53 Sivasubramanian M: If these naunces are not factored in, even if there is an email address provided by the Registrant, the Registrant is still not relatively unreachable.
00:45:23 Sivasubramanian M: and also the possibility that the Registrant is not who he/she appears to be.
00:47:14 hadia Elminiawi: anonymization according to the GDPR definition is not possible
00:49:23 Alan Greenberg: Interesting anecdote: One of the reasons that registrations failed in the accuracy reporting system(ARS) was that the registrar changes anon. e-mail addresses to prevent spam, and by the time the analysis was done in the ARS, the anon address was no longer functioning.
00:59:00 Gisella Gruber - ICANN Org: Olévié - tu es connecte?
01:11:10 Greg Shatan: Maybe SAC118 should have been called the SSAD SAC....
01:11:55 hadia Elminiawi: no question - just a comment
01:12:54 Cheryl Langdon-Orr: Doing better is indeed a great aim
01:13:01 hadia Elminiawi: the 5 stakeholder groups included the SSAC and ALAC of course
01:13:10 Cheryl Langdon-Orr: E only means no Issue Freport in GNSO terms of a PDP
01:13:35 Cheryl Langdon-Orr: the charter usually has any time binding associated with such a PDP
01:14:37 Greg Shatan: The intent was for a little more expeditiousness throughout, if I recall our work correctly.
01:15:38 Cheryl Langdon-Orr: yes Greg the time expectation(s) or binding was in the Charters though NOT from the name of the PDP type … Just saying ;-)
01:20:13 Cheryl Langdon-Orr: very well noted @Rod re the Representation models we often see
01:21:51 Cheryl Langdon-Orr: Yup :-)
01:22:10 Cheryl Langdon-Orr: Thanks everyone another good session with SSAC
01:22:34 hadia Elminiawi: Thank you SSAC team
01:22:38 hadia Elminiawi: Thank you all
01:22:44 Herb Waye: Thanks you all… stay safe and be kind
01:22:46 hadia Elminiawi: bye for now
01:22:46 Chokri Ben Romdhane: +Alan hope that is not the case of SSAC
01:22:49 Greg Shatan: Olivier just went back to London. Blame Brexit.
01:22:53 DANIEL K. NANGHAKA: thank you all
01:22:53 Seun S. Ojedeji: Bye
01:22:54 Dave.Kissoondoyal: Thanks and bye to all
01:23:00 Chokri Ben Romdhane: THANK YOU ALL
AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
