| No. | Date | Proponent | Category | Topic (Mapped to the Super Consolidated URS Topics Table) | Phase 2 Topic? | File | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| George Kirikos | Operational Fix | F. REMEDIES 4. Other topics | |||
| 2 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | M. URS PROVIDERS (no applicable subheading at present) | Yes | ||
| 3 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | J. LANGUAGE ISSUES 1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination | |||
| 4 |
| Maxim Alzoba | Operational Fix | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of Suspension Period 3. Review of Implementation | |||
| 5 |
| David McAuley | Policy | A. THE COMPLAINT 8. Other topics | |||
| 6 |
| Zak Muscovitch | Policy | J. LANGUAGE ISSUES 1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination | |||
| 7 |
| Zak Muscovitch | Operational Fix | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of Suspension Period 3. Review of Implementation | |||
| 8 |
| Zak Muscovitch | Policy | M. URS PROVIERS 1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists) | |||
| 9 |
| Zak Muscovitch | Policy | M. URS PROVIERS 1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists) | |||
| 10 |
| Zak Muscovitch | Policy | M. URS PROVIERS 2. Conflict of interest | |||
| 11 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model | Yes | ||
| 12 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES 1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g. summary procedure in the UDRP | Yes | ||
| 13 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | C. RESPONSE 1. Duration of response period | Yes | ||
| 14 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | A. THE COMPLAINT 3. Limited filing period | Yes | ||
| 15 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | G. APPEAL 2. De novo review | Yes | Related proposals | |
| 16 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | G. APPEAL 1. Appeals process | Yes | ||
| 17 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | G. APPEAL 2. De novo review | Yes | ||
| 18 |
| Kristine Dorrain | Operational Fix | B. NOTICE 3. Other topics | |||
| 19 |
| George Kirikos | Other (elimination of URS procedure entirely) | N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES 1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g., summary procedure in the UDRP | |||
| 20 |
| Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | Policy | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of suspension period | |||
| 21 |
| Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | Policy | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model | |||
| 22 |
| Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | Policy | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies | |||
| 23 |
| Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | Policy | F. REMEDIES 3. Review of implementation | |||
| 24 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | B. NOTICE 1. Receipt by registrant (Notice - feedback from Complainant & Respondent) | Yes | ||
| 25 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | D. STANDARD OF PROOF 1. General | Yes | ||
| 26 |
| David McAuley | Policy | G. APPEAL 2. De novo review | |||
| 27 |
| George Kirikos | Other (URS and UDRP Providers themselves to be brought under contract with ICANN) | (no applicable subheading at present) | |||
