The following two Google Docs summarize the RPM WG's deliberations on the URS Proposals submitted by Sub Teams and Individual WG members. These two Google Docs also note the approach of incorporating these proposals in the Initial Report.
Sub Team Proposals
- WG revision to the URS Sub Team Proposals for the inclusion in the Initial Report (Drafted as of 12 December 2019, with redline edits): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jlsM6yl3A9ssPdHymjZwoSQXsncsl8h_9oOE1vFYm9o/edit?usp=sharing
- Updated version (Drafted as of 24 October 2019) - Staff's attempt to refine the Sub Team proposals and close off the action items: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jlsM6yl3A9ssPdHymjZwoSQXsncsl8h_9oOE1vFYm9o/edit?usp=sharing
- Archived version (Drafted as of 01 October 2018): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wut5-zMqpDuwNbWXqLDebqe9wYa0EJJ_2prt8jdQOZY/edit?usp=sharing
Individual Proposals
- WG Co-Chairs' designation on which URS Individual Proposals will be included in the Initial Report based on the WG survey/deliberation from October 2019 to January 2020: https://docs.google.com/document/d/110tgExAlgzrCbuiy0OiefXG2mKbo_SCLrU037zErN2k/edit
- Results of the WG survey on which URS Individual Proposals should be published in the Initial Report(Published on 3 November 2019)
- Updated document following ICANN63 Barcelona sessions (Draft as of 21 Oct 2018): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ky5uajo8WDfY9x6lbtaEQhb0xXzKVlMSZKFQkHXDE9s/edit?usp=sharing
- Document presented in ICANN63 Barcelona (Draft as of 16 Oct 2018): https://docs.google.com/document/d/18LVAAr8Nb538DniTiHiyBRkfWGsaJNYWwCdaDCzyjUs/edit?usp=sharing
WG Revision to the URS Sub Team Proposals for inclusion in the Initial Report (version 12 December 2019, with redline edits): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jlsM6yl3A9ssPdHymjZwoSQXsncsl8h_9oOE1vFYm9o/edit?usp=sharing
Super Consolidated URS Proposals from Sub Teams (latest version 13 Sep 2018): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jxx9qmIBV9U-LjBM8j73f1X_UbzoyBogWz2phSMZ9lM/edit?usp=sharing
Download the consolidated URS Proposals submitted by individual working group members below:
Consolidated URS Proposals from Individual WG Members.pdf
Slides including survey results of all URS Individual Proposals
I. Suggested Operational Fix |
||||||
| Order No. | Proponent | Topic | File | Presentation Date | Status | Updated Proposal |
| 1 | Kristine Dorrain | B. NOTICE 3. Other topics |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 2 | Maxim Alzoba | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of Suspension Period 3. Review of Implementation |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 3 | Zak Muscovitch | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of Suspension Period 3. Review of Implementation |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 4 | George Kirikos | F. REMEDIES 4. Other topics |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
II. Draft Policy Recommendation |
||||||
Order No. |
Proponent | Topic (Mapped to the Super Consolidated URS Topics Table) | File | Tentative Presentation Date | Status | Updated Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | George Kirikos | A. THE COMPLAINT 3. Limited filing period |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 6 | Claudio DiGangi | A. THE COMPLAINT 8. Other topics |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
Supplemental Information | |
| 7 | George Kirikos | B. NOTICE 1. Receipt by registrant (Notice - feedback from Complainant & Respondent) |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 8 | George Kirikos | C. RESPONSE 1. Duration of response period |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 9 | David McAuley | C. RESPONSE (primary topic) 1. Duration of response period == G. APPEAL (secondary topic) 2. De novo review |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
#36 - merging #9 and #10 |
|
| 10 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | C. RESPONSE (primary topic) 1. Duration of response period == G. APPEAL (secondary topic) 2. De novo review |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 36 | David McAuley & Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | C. RESPONSE (primary topic) 1. Duration of response period == G. APPEAL (secondary topic) 2. De novo review |
URS-Proposal-36.pdf |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
|
| 11 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | C. RESPONSE 3. Response fee |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 12 | George Kirikos | D. STANDARD OF PROOF 1. General |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
Revised version sent on 16 Oct 2018 |
|
| 35 | George Kirikos | D. STANDARD OF PROOF 1. General |
URS-Proposal-35.pdf |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
|
| 13 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 14 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies |
n/a |
PRESENTATION NOT NEEDED |
Can be merged |
|
| 15 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 16 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies 2. Duration of suspension period |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
Can be merged |
|
| 17 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of suspension period |
n/a |
PRESENTATION NOT NEEDED |
||
| 18 | George Kirikos | G. APPEAL 1. Appeals process |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 19 | George Kirikos | G. APPEAL 1. Appeals process |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 20 | George Kirikos | G. APPEAL 1. Appeals process |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 21 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model |
n/a |
PRESENTATION NOT NEEDED |
Can be merged | |
| 22 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 23 | George Kirikos | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 24 | George Kirikos | J. LANGUAGE ISSUES 1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
#34 - merging #24 & #25 |
|
| 25 | Zak Muscovitch | J. LANGUAGE ISSUES 1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 34 | George Kirikos & Zak Muscovitch | J. LANGUAGE ISSUES 1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 26 | Zak Muscovitch | M. URS PROVIERS 1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists) |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 27 | Zak Muscovitch | M. URS PROVIERS 1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists) |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 28 | Zak Muscovitch | M. URS PROVIERS 2. Conflict of interest |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 29 | George Kirikos | M. URS PROVIDERS (no applicable subheading at present) |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 30 | George Kirikos | N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES 1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g. summary procedure in the UDRP |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 31 | David McAuley | (no applicable subheading at present) |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
III. Other |
||||||
| Order No. | Proponent | Topic | File | Tentative Presentation Date | Status | Updated Proposal |
| 32 | George Kirikos | N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES 1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g., summary procedure in the UDRP |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
| 33 | George Kirikos | (no applicable subheading at present) |
|
PRESENTATION COMPLETED |
||
