Instructions:
- Please use the <Edit Contents> menu option (directly above) to complete this form. Remember to <Save> the page (bottom right) after making updates.
- Travelers are asked to collaborate as a team in pulling together the appropriate information.
- This Trip Assessment form will be automatically associated with its related Proposal; therefore, no duplicate traveler identification information is required.
- The information fields are 'richtext' so that they can accommodate tables, links, images, attachments, and other formatting capabilities that may be useful in explaining/describing the Trip.
- This form may be edited/saved as many times as needed. When completed, please fill out the completion date in question no.4 on the form and notify your Program Coordinator (PC) for further processing.
Assessment Status |
Trip Assessments should be completed within three (3) weeks of the traveler's return date.
Trip Assessment Form | LINK TO TRIP PROPOSAL: EURALO Trip Proposal 3 |
---|---|
1) Describe the Trip in sufficient detail | Oksana Prykhodko: Participation (as CROP funded EURALO member) in 11th edition of European Dialogue on Internet Governance (EuroDIG) is extremely important for me (as for the representative of the country – Ukraine – with lack of understanding of the concept of multistakeholderism). This time there was a lot of Ukrainians in Tbilisi, and it was great to initiate some discussions of Internet Governance issues with Ukrainian and international stakeholders. Besides I was member of organizing team of the educational session on GDPR. Information regarding preparation process and all sessions I attended I shared on Facebook in Russian (and received a lot of questions and propositions of cooperation from governmental Ukrainian stakeholders). I arrived to Tbilisi on June 3 (to participate in pre-event of EuroDIG). Attended panels: June 4: - Newcomers briefing session; - Cybersecurity and international norms: The work of the Global Commission on Stability of the Cyberspace; - NRI Assembly; - Council of Europe – Steering Committee of Cybercrime at Eastern Partnership Project: Capacity building on cybercrime and electronic evidence; - Welcoming cocktail. June 5: - Opening session; - Is GDPR still a mystery? - Digital education action plan; - Children’s rights for a better Internet; - Information disorder: causes, risks and remedies: - Gala dinner. June 6: - SEEDIG Messages; - Surveillance, laws and governments vs. Internet rights; - Non-state actors in Europe and beyond: The true shapers of cybersecurity norms?! - Blockchain – a competition to governments? - Challenges of cybercrime and transborder investigations; - Future of the IGF 2018; - Wrap-up. One of the key issues for Ukraine is GDPR, and it was extremely useful for me to be member of organizing team for GDPR session. We were divided in different groups and I participated in the discussion of the role of DPA (with representative of Georgian DPA). Georgia did great job on GDPR as non-EU country, and this experience is extremely important for Ukraine, but we lacked communication with representatives of EU DPA (to better understand extraterritorial nature of GDPR). Another important issue for us is the idea of certification of law enforcement structures to access Whois. Another very important session for me was presentation of Wolfgang Kleinwachter results of Global Commission on Stability in Cyberspace and his proposition to start preparation for WSIS+20. For example, we discussed with Wolfgang, Michal Boni and Ukrainian diplomat possibility of workshops for Ukrainian diplomats and officials on practical tools of coordination of Ukrainian position on Internet Governance issues with EU position (at this moment we do not have such tools). NRI Assembly began from extremely important and interesting discussion with Larry Strickling of the concept of multistakeholderism and consensus. We will translate Internet Governance summary “Why the Multistakeholder Approach Works” into Russian and discuss it with Ukrainian youth. All other attended sessions opened new possibilities for Ukrainian stakeholders to be actively engaged in Internet Governance on national, European and global level, and we continue to discuss them now. Extremely important issues were raised at the panel “Information disorder: causes, risks and remedies”. I asked the question: “Does the site eurodig.org itself have tools for removing fake information or disinformation?”. I was promised to receive answer later. |
2) Explain the extent to which the Proposed Goals and Outcomes were accomplished (see above LINK to review the original Proposal): |
|
3) Additional information pertaining to this outreach Trip (optional): | Oksana Prykhodko: I would like to thank ICANN and EURALO for the CROP funding and the great opportunities to participate in the most important European IG event. |
4) Please fill out the date when you have completed this form: | 19-Jun-2018 |
Note: To be completed by a Program Coordinator (PC) designated by this organization/structure.
Acknowledgements | Confirmed? | Name | Date | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Trip Assessment information has been gathered and properly entered into this form. | ||||
The ICANN Organization / Structure's leadership has authorized the submission of this Trip Assessment. | ||||
The ICANN Stakeholder Engagement Vice-President has concurred that this Trip Assessment satisfactorily reports the extent to which the goals/outcomes outlined in the original proposal have been achieved. | ||||
=============== | ========== | ============================== |
CROP Trip Assessment Template (May 2017)