You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

Public Comment CloseStatement
Name 

Status

Assignee(s)

Call for
Comments Open
Call for
Comments
Close 
Vote OpenVote CloseDate of SubmissionStaff Contact and EmailStatement Number

27 July 2018

COMMENT

26 July 2018

Hide the information below, please click here 


FINAL VERSION SUBMITTED (IF RATIFIED)

The final version to be submitted, if the draft is ratified, will be placed here by upon completion of the vote. 



FINAL DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC

The final draft version to be voted upon by the ALAC will be placed here before the vote is to begin.



DRAFT SUBMITTED FOR DISCUSSION

The first draft submitted will be placed here before the call for comments begins. The Draft should be preceded by the name of the person submitting the draft and the date/time. If, during the discussion, the draft is revised, the older version(S) should be left in place and the new version along with a header line identifying the drafter and date/time should be placed above the older version(s), separated by a Horizontal Rule (available + Insert More Content control).

Posted by Alan Greenberg, 26 July 2018\


The ALAC appreciates the opportunity to comment on ICANN’s Open Data Initiative.

Although a number of the data assets are of interest to At-Large, with 231 entries in the list, it is difficult to identify those of most interest to our group. Certain easy access to ICANN meeting demographics and the data associated with At-Large are high on our list. The ALAC suggests that once initial priorities are established, this ordered list be submitted for public comment. It is far easier to critique such a list that create it from scratch.

Perhaps of more importance is the data that is not identified here. The most obvious gap (unless it is there under a cryptic name) is exhaustive data about contractual compliance and the actions it takes. This is arguably one of the most critical areas of ICANN’s operations and other than some specific data sets compiled for the CCT Review, there appears to be nothing.

Another example that is of interest to At-Large is data associated with the Fellowship. The URL listed implies that the only information to be provided is a list of fellows along with the country and interest area. Absent however are the demographics about the Fellowship applicants (ie those who suceeded plus those who did not). This could provide critical data on to what extent information about the Fellowship is reaching certain parts of the world.

Understanding the methodology of how the data will be accumulated is of interest. For the data that already exists on the web, will:

  • The new data be derived (scraped from the web); or
  • The web data will be constructed from the data tables; or
  • The two reside independently.

If the latter, how will ICANN ensure that the two stay in sync with each other?

Lastly, of great interest are the tools that will be made available for the ICANN community to use to extract and process the data. The utility of the entire project will greatly hinge on the availability and capabilities of such tools.

  • No labels