You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 67 Next »

(warning)  As per the decision reached on plenary call #14, the WHOIS1 Rec #4 Compliance subgroup and the Topic 7 Compliance subgroup have been merged into one subgroup, and this wiki page will be the page used by that combined subgroup moving forward.
(red star)Objectives

Topic (1)
Consistent with ICANN’s mission and Bylaws, Section 4.6(e)(iv), the Review Team will (a) evaluate the extent to which ICANN Org has implemented each prior Directory Service Review recommendation (noting differences if any between recommended and implemented steps), (b) assess to the degree practical the extent to which implementation of each recommendation was effective in addressing the issue identified by the prior RT or generated additional information useful to management and evolution of WHOIS (RDS), and (c) determine if any specific measurable steps should be recommended to enhance results achieved through the prior RT’s recommendations. This includes developing a framework to measure and assess the effectiveness of recommendations, and applying that approach to all areas of WHOIS originally assessed by the prior RT (as applicable). 

RT1 Recommendations to be assessed by this subgroup:
Recommendation #4 - Compliance

Topic (7)
Consistent with ICANN’s mission to ensure the stable and secure operation of the Internet's unique identifier systems by enforcing policies, procedures and principles associated with registry and registrar obligations to maintain and provide access to accurate and up-to-date information about registered names and name servers, the review team will (to the extent that this is not already covered in prior RT recommendations), (a) assess the effectiveness and transparency of ICANN enforcement of existing policy relating to WHOIS (RDS) through Contractual Compliance actions, structure and processes, including consistency of enforcement actions and availability of related data,  (b) identifying high-priority procedural or data gaps (if any), and (c) recommending specific measurable steps (if any) the team believes are important to fill gaps.

(red star)Leader/Rapporteur: Susan Kawaguchi

(red star)Members: Erika Mann, Carlton Samuels, Chris Disspain, Susan Kawaguchi, Thomas Walden

(red star)Mailing-list archives:  http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rec4-compliance/

(red star)Conference calls: see here

(red star)Review Team Templates: see here


Subgroup Documents

Date

Document (Versions in Red are latest)

File


 

 


 

 

 


 


 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Face-to-Face Mtg #2 Slides - Findings

v2

v1

Subgroup Report

v3

v2

v1

Planning Questions

v1

Next Steps

v1

First Pass Document

Compliance v2 (merged doc)

Compliance v1 (merged doc)

Assembled topic 1 rec #4 v3 & topic 7 v1 (Draft for subgroup rapporteur and subgroup's approval)

Topic 1 Rec #4 v3

Topic 1 Rec #4 v2

Topic 1 Rec #4 v1

Topic 7 v1


PPTX

PPTX


DOCX

DOCX

DOCX


PPTX


DOCX


DOCX

DOCX

DOCX

DOCX

DOCX

DOCX

DOCX

Background Documents

Further background documents may be found on the Review Team's overall Background Materials page.

ICANN Org Briefings/Answers

Open Actions/Requests

*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert

Item #Source of RequestDate of RequestAction Item RequestAction Owner

Anticipated Completion Date*

Progress Notes
13Email

 

Questions to ICANN complianceICANN org

 


12#5

 

Subgroup members to read ICANN compliance's answers and to advise of any follow-up questions. 

Subgroup

7#3

 

Susan to reach out to Thomas to identify policies (from above list) that he will volunteer to review.

Susan

6#3

 

Susan to include her findings about grandfathered domain names in draft subgroup report (see decisions reached, #3).

Susan

5#3

 

Subgroup members to review and attempt to answer questions prior to F2F meeting as follows:

  • Erika to work on AWIP and CLDP
  • Carlton to work on Procedures for Conflicts with Local Law and Transition of .COM, .NET, and JOBS to Thick WHOIS Policy 
  • Other policies needing a volunteer to review: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy, UDRP/URS, ERRP, Translation/Transliteration

Questions to be addressed (at minimum):

  • Status of each of the following policies? Created/implemented/being reviewed? 
  • What impact does WHOIS have on each of these policies? 
  • Are there issues with these policies? 
  • How is WHOIS used in these policies? 
  • Are these effective?
  • Compliance issues

Erika

Carlton

TBC



Completed Actions/Requests

*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert

Item #Source of RequestDate of RequestAction Item RequestAction Owner

Anticipated Completion Date*

Progress NotesCompleted ResponseCompletion Date
11#23

 

MSSI Secretariat to send out a new doodle.MSSI-Secretariat

 


Email

 

10Email

Interview/discussion questions - second setICANN org

 


Email

9Email

 

Interview/discussion questions - first setICANN org

 


Email

8#3

 

Suggest timeline for completing briefing questions and desired timeframe for that briefing with ICANN Org compliance.

Susan

Email

 

4#2

 

Subgroup 2-day face-to-face meeting: Alan and Susan requested to hold a two days subgroup face-to-face meeting with Compliance Department at ICANN org office in Los Angeles, only a small conference room would be needed. This would happen before the next plenary face-to-face meeting. ICANN org to liaise with meetings team to confirm notification time needed with meetings teamto prepare such meeting to identify a possible date (also taking into consideration compliance department staff would be available).ICANN org

Meeting #3 - with Compliance Management (1 February 2018)

Written answers to 1 Feb questions

 

3#2

 

Next Week’s Kick-Off Meeting with ICANN org Compliance Team (exact date to be confirmed):

Initial 1hour kickoff meeting between subgroup members who are in LA next week and members of the compliance Department

- Questions raised on today's call to be shared with the subgroup (see below), subgroup members not attending the call to share input/edits by Wednesday COB.

- Subgroup members to review attached first pass planning document and raise any questions, edits, by tomorrow COB.

- ICANN org to look into the possibility to add remote participation during the meeting with compliance for remote subgroup members.

Subgroup/ICANN org



2#1

 

Susan to take a first look at filling in the work statement based on today's discussion, and share it with the subgroup for input. 

Susan



1#1

 

Susan to provide ICANN org with dates for future subgroup call. Doodle to be sent out to subgroup based on this.

Susan



Decisions Reached

Source of RequestDateDecision
#3

 

Include in briefing questions: 

  • Of the 60% of legacy gTLDs that are grandfathered on the 2009 RAA, how many comply with the 2013 RAA anyway? Note this is a possible gap to be addressed by a recommendation for a policy issue to be addressed.
  • Is there anything that would make compliance enforcement easier?



  • No labels