You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 38 Next »

(warning)  As per the decision reached on plenary call #14, the WHOIS1 Rec #4 Compliance subgroup and the Topic 7 Compliance subgroup have been merged into one subgroup, and this wiki page will be the page used by that combined subgroup moving forward.


(red star)Objectives

Topic (1)
Consistent with ICANN’s mission and Bylaws, Section 4.6(e)(iv), the Review Team will (a) evaluate the extent to which ICANN Org has implemented each prior Directory Service Review recommendation (noting differences if any between recommended and implemented steps), (b) assess to the degree practical the extent to which implementation of each recommendation was effective in addressing the issue identified by the prior RT or generated additional information useful to management and evolution of WHOIS (RDS), and (c) determine if any specific measurable steps should be recommended to enhance results achieved through the prior RT’s recommendations. This includes developing a framework to measure and assess the effectiveness of recommendations, and applying that approach to all areas of WHOIS originally assessed by the prior RT (as applicable). 

RT1 Recommendations to be assessed by this subgroup:
Recommendation #4 - Compliance


Topic (7)
Consistent with ICANN’s mission to ensure the stable and secure operation of the Internet's unique identifier systems by enforcing policies, procedures and principles associated with registry and registrar obligations to maintain and provide access to accurate and up-to-date information about registered names and name servers, the review team will (to the extent that this is not already covered in prior RT recommendations), (a) assess the effectiveness and transparency of ICANN enforcement of existing policy relating to WHOIS (RDS) through Contractual Compliance actions, structure and processes, including consistency of enforcement actions and availability of related data,  (b) identifying high-priority procedural or data gaps (if any), and (c) recommending specific measurable steps (if any) the team believes are important to fill gaps.

(red star)Leader/Rapporteur: Susan Kawaguchi

(red star)Members: Erika Mann, Carlton Samuels, Chris Disspain, Susan Kawaguchi, Thomas Walden

(red star)Mailing-list archives:  http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rec4-compliance/

(red star)Conference calls: see here

(red star)Review Team Templates: see here

Subgroup Documents

Date

Document (Versions in Red are latest)

File


23 Jan 2018

18 Jan 2018

17 Jan 2018

18 Dec 2017

07 Dec 2017

06 Dec 2017

05 Dec 2017

First Pass Document

Compliance v2 (merged doc)

Compliance v1 (merged doc)

Assembled topic 1 rec #4 v3 & topic 7 v1 (Draft for subgroup rapporteur and subgroup's approval)

Topic 1 Rec #4 v3

Topic 1 Rec #4 v2

Topic 1 Rec #4 v1

Topic 7 v1


DOCX

DOCX

DOCX

DOCX

DOCX

DOCX

DOCX

Background Documents

Further background documents may be found on the Review Team's overall Background Materials page.


Open Actions/Requests

*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert

Item #Source of RequestDate of RequestAction Item RequestAction Owner

Anticipated Completion Date*

Progress Notes

Completed Actions/Requests

*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert

Item #Source of RequestDate of RequestAction Item RequestAction Owner

Anticipated Completion Date*

Progress NotesCompleted ResponseCompletion Date

Decisions Reached

DateDecision
  • No labels