You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 19 Next »

Public Comment CloseStatement
Name 

Status

Assignee(s)

Call for
Comments Open
Call for
Comments
Close 
Vote OpenVote CloseDate of SubmissionStaff Contact and EmailStatement Number


14 January 2018


Recommendations to Improve ICANN Staff Accountability


VOTING



Maureen Hilyard

Bastiaan Goslings

Ricardo Holmquist


08 January 2018


11 January 2018


15 January 2018


19 January 2018


12 January 2018


Hide the information below, please click here 

FINAL VERSION TO BE SUBMITTED IF RATIFIED

The final version to be submitted, if the draft is ratified, will be placed here by upon completion of the vote. 


 


FINAL DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC

The final draft version to be voted upon by the ALAC will be placed here before the vote is to begin.


The ALAC commends the CCWG-Accountability for their recommendations which: 1) identify how ICANN can better address contentious issues; 2) suggest mechanisms that can aid more effective and collaborative relationships between the staff and the community; and 3) provide greater clarity about roles and responsibilities as well as greater transparency and accountability in relation to ICANN's performance management and other evaluative processes.

It was appreciated that recommendations from WS1 had already been addressed by ICANN. For example, "ICANN's Delegation of Authority" details the powers vested in ICANN staff, and the "ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior" is regarded as a Code of Conduct. The ALAC notes that, moving forward, ICANN will aim to improve the visibility and transparency of the ICANN's accountability mechanisms and of staff training related to their implementation. The recommendation that these will be published on the ICANN website will give more clarity for stakeholders on staff performance and accountability.  

The ALAC also commends the development of a "cross-community" panel, involving the Ombudsman and the Complaints Officer as well as representatives of the Empowered Community and the ICANN Board, to deal more holistically with any contentious staff accountability issues. 

 


FIRST DRAFT SUBMITTED

The first draft submitted will be placed here before the call for comments begins.


The ALAC commends the CCWG-Accountability for their recommendations which identify how ICANN can better address contentious issues; suggest mechanisms that can aid more effective and collaborative relationships between the staff and the community; and provide greater clarity about roles and responsibilities as well as greater transparency and accountability in relation to ICANN's performance management and other evaluative processes.

It was appreciated that recommendations from WS1 had already been addressed by ICANN, for example, "ICANN's Delegation of Authority" to detail the powers vested in ICANN staff, and the "ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviour" as a Code of Conduct. The ALAC notes that, moving forward, ICANN will aim to improve the visibility and transparency of the ICANN's accountability mechanisms and of staff training related to their implementation. The recommendation that these will be published on the ICANN website will give more clarity for stakeholders on staff performance and accountability.  

The ALAC also commends the development of a "cross-community" panel, involving the Ombudsman and the Complaints Officer as well as representatives of the Empowered Community and the ICANN Board, to deal more holistically with any contentious staff accountability issues. 

  • No labels