(red star)Objective

Consistent with ICANN’s mission and Bylaws, Section 4.6(e)(iv), the Review Team will (a) evaluate the extent to which ICANN Org has implemented each prior Directory Service Review recommendation (noting differences if any between recommended and implemented steps), (b) assess to the degree practical the extent to which implementation of each recommendation was effective in addressing the issue identified by the prior RT or generated additional information useful to management and evolution of WHOIS (RDS), and (c) determine if any specific measurable steps should be recommended to enhance results achieved through the prior RT’s recommendations. This includes developing a framework to measure and assess the effectiveness of recommendations, and applying that approach to all areas of WHOIS originally assessed by the prior RT (as applicable). 

RT1 Recommendations to be assessed by this subgroup:

Recommendations #5, 6, 7, 8, 9 - Data Accuracy

Background Documents

Further background documents may be found on the Review Team's overall Background Materials page.

(red star)Leader/Rapporteur: Lili Sun

(red star)Members: Cathrin Bauer-Bulst, Dmitry Belyavsky, Lili Sun, Erika Mann

(red star)Mailing-list archives:  http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-dataaccuracy/

(red star)Conference calls: see here

(red star)Review Team Templates: see here


Subgroup Documents

Date

Document (Versions in Red are latest)

File

Subgroup Report

 

v6DOCX

 

v5 (incl. FtoF #3 Agreements)DOCX

 

v4DOCX

 

v3DOCX

 

v2DOCX

 

v1DOCX

Face-to-Face Mtg #2 Slides - Findings

 

v2PPTX

 

v1PPTX
Planning Questions

 

v1PPT
First Pass Document

 

v4DOCX

 

v3DOCX

 

v2DOCX

 

v1DOCX

ICANN Org Briefings/Answers

Open Actions/Requests

*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert

Item #Source of RequestDate of RequestAction Item RequestAction Owner

Anticipated Completion Date*

Progress Notes
13F2F#3

ICANN to ask SMEs to answer the question: Does ARS have access to non-public data under the Temporary Specification? Is the WHOIS data that is sampled by ARS obtained from the Registrar or Registry (for thick TLDs, since under GDPR much contact data may be redacted?)

ICANN org

12F2F#3

Lili and Alan to provide the linkage between the issues identified in the DA section and the recommendations in the Compliance section. For example, do all of the recommendations contribute to improving data accuracy?

Lili/Alan

11F2F#3

Lili to generate a recommendation that the ARS team look for potentially-anomalous results (e.g., 40% of ARS-generated tickets closed with no action because the WHOIS record changed) to determine the underlying cause.
Lili

Completed Actions/Requests

*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert

Item #Source of RequestDate of RequestAction Item RequestAction Owner

Anticipated Completion Date*

Progress NotesCompleted ResponseCompletion Date
10F2F#3

Ask GDD and Compliance whether there is a routine feedback process in place for Compliance to advise the ARS project of ARS-detected inaccuracies that were not ultimately found by Compliance to be inaccuracies (e.g., tickets generated because the state was missing in a country where states are not applicable)ICANN org

 


Email

 

9#33

Work in collaboration with rec. 4 compliance subgroup to make sure both subgroup reports are in alignment, following comments received at ICANN62.Lili



8#26

 

Lili to look into Compliance actions and link their work to data accuracy subgroup

Lili

Email

 

7Email

 

Brussels follow-up list of questions to ICANN complianceICANN org

 


Email

 

6

#26

 

Lili to confirm list of questions to ICANN Compliance 

Lili

Email

 

5Email

 

10 questions to address in writing briefingICANN org

 


4#1

Participate in the 20 March briefing on P/P complianceSubgroup

 


Call archives

 

3#1

Develop specific questions not covered in existing briefing and materials (if any) to be addressed by a further briefing by ICANN OrgSubgroup

Email

 

2#1

Submit first draft briefing questions by this Thursday, subgroup review/comment on questions by next week, to submit questions to ICANN Org for answers to be received no later than the end of MarcSubgroup

Email

 

1#1

Collect key findings from each subgroup member into the report template by the end of MarchLili

 


Email

 

Decisions Reached

Source of requestDateDecision
F2F#3

 

The RT will not formulate an issue or recommendation regarding assessing risk of identity theft. There were no objections.

#1

 

  • Lili/Dmitry to focus on following questions:

1)    The implementation progress of "WHOIS ACCURACY PROGRAM SPECIFICATION" in 2013 RAA.

2)    The progress of WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System (ARS) project and to what extent the inaccuracy has been reduced

    • Cathrin to focus on the following question:

3)    The accurate rate of WHOIS data which uses Privacy/Proxy service.

#1

 

Subgroup to focus on Q4 "Are the measures which have been taken effective in achieving the objective?'" once questions 1,2,3 have been dealt with
#1

 

Question 5 (Whether we can measure data accuracy when data becomes mostly hidden?) to be included in briefing questions to the ARS team for 1-2.

(red star)Objective

Consistent with ICANN’s mission and Bylaws, Section 4.6(e)(iv), the Review Team will (a) evaluate the extent to which ICANN Org has implemented each prior Directory Service Review recommendation (noting differences if any between recommended and implemented steps), (b) assess to the degree practical the extent to which implementation of each recommendation was effective in addressing the issue identified by the prior RT or generated additional information useful to management and evolution of WHOIS (RDS), and (c) determine if any specific measurable steps should be recommended to enhance results achieved through the prior RT’s recommendations. This includes developing a framework to measure and assess the effectiveness of recommendations, and applying that approach to all areas of WHOIS originally assessed by the prior RT (as applicable). 

RT1 Recommendations to be assessed by this subgroup:

Recommendations #5, 6, 7, 8, 9 - Data Accuracy

Background Documents

Further background documents may be found on the Review Team's overall Background Materials page.

(red star)Leader/Rapporteur: Lili Sun

(red star)Members: Cathrin Bauer-Bulst, Dmitry Belyavsky, Lili Sun, Erika Mann

(red star)Mailing-list archives:  http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-dataaccuracy/

(red star)Conference calls: see here

(red star)Review Team Templates: see here


Subgroup Documents

Date

Document (Versions in Red are latest)

File




09 Feb 2018

07 Feb 2018

17 Jan 2018

05 Jan 2018

06 Dec 2017

Subgroup Report

1.1                   (if any)

Planning Questions

v1

First Pass Document

v4

v3

v2

v1


DOCX


PPT


DOCX

DOCX

DOCX

DOCX

ICANN Org Briefings/Answers

Open Actions/Requests

*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert

Item #Source of RequestDate of RequestAction Item RequestAction Owner

Anticipated Completion Date*

Progress Notes

Completed Actions/Requests

*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert

Item #Source of RequestDate of RequestAction Item RequestAction Owner

Anticipated Completion Date*

Progress NotesCompleted ResponseCompletion Date
5Email

 

10 questions to address in writing briefingICANN org

 


4#1

Participate in the 20 March briefing on P/P complianceSubgroup

 


Call archives

 

3#1

Develop specific questions not covered in existing briefing and materials (if any) to be addressed by a further briefing by ICANN OrgSubgroup

Email

 

2#1

Submit first draft briefing questions by this Thursday, subgroup review/comment on questions by next week, to submit questions to ICANN Org for answers to be received no later than the end of MarcSubgroup

Email

 

1#1

Collect key findings from each subgroup member into the report template by the end of MarchLili

 


Email

 

Decisions Reached

DateDecision

 

  • Lili/Dmitry to focus on following questions:

1)    The implementation progress of "WHOIS ACCURACY PROGRAM SPECIFICATION" in 2013 RAA.

2)    The progress of WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System (ARS) project and to what extent the inaccuracy has been reduced

    • Cathrin to focus on the following question:

3)    The accurate rate of WHOIS data which uses Privacy/Proxy service.

 

Subgroup to focus on Q4 "Are the measures which have been taken effective in achieving the objective?'" once questions 1,2,3 have been dealt with

 

Question 5 (Whether we can measure data accuracy when data becomes mostly hidden?) to be included in briefing questions to the ARS team for 1-2.

  • No labels