Independent Examiner’s Final Recommendation | At-Large should update its Rules of Procedure to include a new procedure regarding the functioning and membership of the CoE. |
Issue Identified | |
Does ALAC Support Recommendation? | |
If Not, Please Provide Reasoning. | |
If ALAC Does Not Support Recommendation, Does It Suggest an Alternative Recommendation? If so, please provide a suggested alternative Recommendation. | |
Prioritization | |
Additional Working Party Comments | |
ALAC Comments | Status:Accept in principle?? Comment: (Nice to acknowledge those who have contributed but no current appointments. Danger of having to induct all people leaving office even if not warranted. Do we need it?) Very low priority. == While the ALAC recognises the usefulness and purpose of this recommendation, the ALAC believes that the constraints around the membership of this Council, especially in relation to the rigid set of rules around how long a person could serve, how often they could travel, and the presumption that they would be endlessly available regardless of these rules, is (for some of the current “elders” around At-Large) rather laughable. |
Possible Dependencies | |
Who Will Implement? | |
Resource Requirements | |
Budget Effects impact? | |
Implementation Timeline | |
Proposed Implementation Steps |
AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
