Attendees:

Team:  

Megan Richards, Kaili Kan,Jonathan Zuck, Jamie Hedlund, Laureen Kapin, Carlos Gutierrez, Jordyn Buchanan, Dejan Djukic, Calvin Browne, Drew Bagley, Waudo Siganga

Staff: 

Alice Jansen, Jean-Baptiste Deroulez, Pamela Smith, Brian Aitchison, Eleeza Agopian

Apologies:   Kaili Kan, David Taylor, Gaongalelwe Mosweu, Fabro Stiebel

Agenda:  

                a.   Welcome, roll-call SoI

                b.   Discussion on Public Comments: Review Team

                c.    Draft Report edits (attached): Stan

                d.   ICANN59 Agenda: Jean-Baptiste

                e.    A.O.B.

Documents:

CCT Draft Final Report

ICANN59 Meeting Program and Agenda

Recordings:

Chat Transcript:  EN

Transcript:  EN

Notes:

Overview of Public Comments Received (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cct-rt-draft-report-2017-03-07-en)

1 Thomas Busse
2 .BZH Registry
3 GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG
4 National Association of Boards of Pharmacy
5 At Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)
6 Canadian International Pharmacy Association
7 Registries Stakeholder Group
8 Canadian International Pharmacy Association
9 NIXI
10 Verified Top-Level Domains Consortium
11 ICANN Business Constituency
12 .FEEDBACK PICDRP coalition / Mayer Brown LLP
13 Governmental Advisory Committee
14 Com Laude & Valideus
15 DomainMondo.com
16 Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group
17 United Kingdom Government
18 PharmacyChecker.com
19 ICANN Organization
20 International Trademark Association
21 Neustar, Inc.
22 Intellectual Property Constituency
23 At Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)
24 United States Government

ICANN59 Schedule: https://icann59johannesburg2017.sched.com/

Stan's paper - approved

Action Items:

  • Engage with Registry Stakeholders Group and comment on draft report
  • DNS abuse discussion - use as springboard to longer discussion
  • Subteams to identify portions of comments that relate to their sections and go back to read thoroughly and draft responses in action item boxes. 
  • By end of week, leadership to read comments on their sections and to contact subteam members, as needed, to gather input on the public comments.
  • Staff to generate list of name(s)/paper for each recommendation


  • No labels