PROPOSED AGENDA:
The call for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team – Track 4 – IDNs/Technical & Operations will take place on Thursday, 27 October 2016 at 15:00 UTC.
08:00 PDT, 11:00 EDT, 16:00 London, 17:00 CEST
For other times: http://tinyurl.com/j2h9slb
Proposed Agenda:
- Welcome
- Opening Remarks
- Call Administration
- Any update from WG activities
- Brief Review of Meeting #3 and any AI's
- Specific Outreach Questions (Continued)
- AOB
- Review of any Action Items
Apologies: Iftikhar Hussain Shah
Dial outs: Cheryl Langdon-Orr
On audio only: none
Notes/Actions:
Action Items:
- Update the JAS questions in the Google Doc with the suggested additions.
- Avri and Jeff will draft a letter for GDD concerning contacting the JAS.
- Send the final version of the outreach questions, as well as the JAS questions, to the Sub Team WT4 list. Send to the community and JAS after Hyderabad.
Discussion Notes:
1. Update from WG activities
- The next meeting is a face-to-face meeting in Hyderabad, Thursday, 03 November, 13:45-18:30. See: https://icann572016.sched.org/event/8cxk/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-procedures-pdp-working-group-face-to-face-meeting and remote access at: https://participate.icann.org/hyd57-hall6.
- The Working Group and Work Track Sub Teams are working on outreach questions.
- The next call will be scheduled in the last week of November. A notice will be sent.
2. Actions from meeting #3 and Specific Outreach Questions (Continued):
Referencing the slides -- slide 5. Also, see the questions at https://docs.google.com/forms/d/147Jn259tNHjFEcZyzPrCWyv8y7GmBVaVL_xVVZa9_G4/edit?ts=5811fb9f. Specific questions for JAS Advisors on Application Quality Control and Name Collisions.
- Should we ask more generally: “Under what set of circumstances could .corp, .home, and .mail be released as TLDs? Under what, if any...”
- Ask questions that would directly impact the outcome of the next round, not the current round.
- The question could be added to the third bullet point under name collisions: "Are there circumstances where strings considered high risk could be released. "Based on data from the first round, can the controlled interruption period be reduced in future rounds..."
- Add: "What if any circumstances could be released under BP3." Add Text for controlled Interruptions.
- From staff: Could provide these to GDD staff since they liaise with JAS. I think they may have suggestions concerning the questions too.
- We will write to GDD asking them for them to let us contact JAS directly, but wouldn't suggest having staff revise the questions.
- Referencing the outreach questions (slide 7), for Hyderabad and also for community input. Might need to work out to the ccNSO too.
