You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 182 Next »

Members: 

  • Laureen Kapin (Subteam Chair)
  • Carlton Samuels
  • Carlos Raul Gutierrez
  • Gao Mosweu
  • Fabro Stiebel
  • Jamie Hedlund
  • Drew Bagley 
  • David Taylor
  • Calvin Browne 

Mandate: This sub team was created to explore two key areas of the CCT Review as outlined in section 9.3 of the Affirmation of Commitments: "...the extent to which the introduction or expansion of gTLDs has promoted ... consumer trust ... as well as effectiveness of ... safeguards put in place to mitigate issues involved in the introduction or expansion."

Latest documents: 
Outline of individual assessments - DOC

 

Documents

Document

(Versions in red are latest) 
File
BRAINSTORMING DOCUMENT

v1 (23 Feb)

v2/3 (3 March)

v4 (4 March)

v5 (10 March)

Priority list

v6 (31 March)

v7 (28 April)

v8 (7 June)

DOC - PDF

DOC - PDF

DOC - PDF - G-doc

DOC- PDF - G-doc  

DOC - PDF - Priority list G-doc

DOC - PDF - G-doc 

PDF

DOC - PDF - G-doc

SAFEGUARDS EFFECTIVENESS MANAGEMENT TABLE

v1 (27 May)

v2 (6 June)

v3 (13 June)

v5 (21 June)

DOC - PDF

DOC - PDF

DOC - PDF

DOC - PDF

SAFEGUARDS ANALYSIS CHART
v1 (1 August)G-doc
DISCUSSION PAPERS - TOPIC LIST

v1 (12 July)

v2 (20 July)

DOC - PDF

DOC - PDF - gDOC 

SCOPE & MANDATE WITH SUBQUESTIONS

v1 (28 August)

v2 (29 August)

v3 (29 August)

v4 (30 August)

v5 (6 September)

v6 (18 September)

DOC - PDF

DOC - PDF

DOC - PDF

DOC - PDF

DOC - PDF

DOC - PDF 

VOLUNTARY PICS
v1 (13 July)DOC - PDF
OTHER
Regulated and sensitive strings delegated (29 April 2016)XLS - PDF
 
ARCHIVES - DOCUMENTS NO LONGER APPLICABLE (error)
WORK PLAN

v1 (3 May)

v2 (2 June)

v3 (23 June)

DOC - PDF

DOC

DOC - PDF

(error) No longer applicable


Assignments/Ownership Post Vienna Meeting
  • For detailed assignments, refer to DOC
  • Revised template - DOC
  • Model issue paper - DOC-PDF

Topic 1:  Has New gTLD Program put mechanisms in to improve trustworthiness in the DNS?

Background of History of GAC Safeguards and new Registry AgreementCarlos 
Description of Technical Safeguards and ImplementationCalvin 
Description of Safeguards Applicable to all gTLDs and ImplementationLaureen 
Description of Safeguards Applicable to sensitive/highly regulated gTLDs and ImplementationLaureen 
Description of Voluntary Public Interest Commitments Drew/Laureen 
Description of Rights Protection Mechanisms (templates 7, 8)David 

Has the New GTLD Program put sufficient mechanisms in place to mitigate risks to the trustworthiness of the DNS?

Have the Safeguards been Implemented in a Manner that Promotes Effective Enforcement?
Technical Safeguards (template 2)Carlos
Implemented GAC Safeguards (templates 2,4,5,11)Laureen
Voluntary PICs (template 6, new paper)Drew/Laureen 
RPMsDavid 
Have the New gTLD Operators Complied with:  
Technical Safeguards (templates 4,7)Fabro 
GAC Implemented Safeguards (templates 4, 7)Fabro 
Voluntary PICs (new template)Jamie 
RPMs (templates 7, 8)David 
What was the Impact of the New Safeguards on DNS Abuse?
(template 1, 3, 4, 5)Drew 
Did the New Rights Protection Mechanisms Mitigate Certain Risks Involved with the Expansion of the gTLD program? (templates 7, 8)David 

Have these efforts had an impact on public perception of the DNS?

What is the level of consumer awareness of the new gTLDs?
For consumers (template 9)Carlton

g-doc

For registrants (template 9)Gao
Have consumers expressed trust in the new gTLD program efforts?
For consumers (template 10)Laureenv1
For registrants (template 10)Laureen
Has consumer trust in the DNS improved overall since the introduction of new gTLDs?
(new template)Jamiev1

------

Discussion Papers for Vienna Meeting
  • Link to revised template - DOC
  • Link to model issue paper - DOC-PDF
DISCUSSION PAPERS - FOR VIENNA MEETINGGoogle drive

DNS Abuse

1. Is there more or less DNS Abuse in the new gTLDs Drew (lead), Fabro, Calvin - (g-doc)

Impact of Safeguards & PICs

- Technical Category/DNS Abuse

2. Have the safeguards been fully implemented?Laureen (lead), Carlos, Calvin (g-doc)

3. What role did the new gTLD safeguards play in preventing DNS abuse? Drew (lead), Fabro, Calvin (g-doc)

4. Have new gTLD registry operators complied with the safeguards? Fabro (lead), Carlton, David (g-doc)

- Specification 11

5.  How was Specification 11 implemented by new gTLD registry operators Paper? Laureen (lead), Carlos, Calvin (g-doc)

6. Did the use of PICs help prevent DNS abuse? Drew (lead), Carlos, Gao, Fabro (g-doc)

- Rights Protection Mechanisms

7. Did the use of Rights Protection Mechanisms mitigate the risks involved with the expansion of the gTLD program? David (lead), Jamie, Fabro (g-doc)

8. Have the new dispute resolution processes reduced trademark infringement? (TBD) David (lead), Jamie, Carlos (g-doc)

Consumer End User Behavior

9.  Are consumers in the global space aware of new gTLDs? Carlton (lead), Gao, Calvin (g-doc)

10. Do consumers trust new gTLDs? Laureen (lead), Gao, Carlos (g-doc)

Effectiveness of Procedures to Enforce Safeguards

11.  Are the new procedures effective in enforcing safeguards? Carlton (lead), Jamie, Laureen (g-doc)

 

 

 

  • No labels